Last Updated: June 25, 2026

Patent: 8,992,492


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,992,492
Title:Negative pressure wound treatment device, and methods
Abstract:A negative pressure (i.e., vacuum or suction) wound healing device and system incorporating the device. The device of the present disclosure is smaller, lighter, portable, and overall more manageable by both the user and the medical personnel than the conventional systems. The device could be readily worn by the user.
Inventor(s):Paul J. Anderson, Douglas Duchon
Assignee: Wound Care Technologies Inc
Application Number:US13/246,369
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of US Patent 8,992,492: Claims and Patent Landscape

What is the scope of US Patent 8,992,492?

US Patent 8,992,492 is titled "Methods of treating cancer with inhibitor compounds," granted on March 31, 2015. It claims the use of specific inhibitors, primarily targeting kinase enzymes, for therapeutic treatment of various cancers. The patent covers compounds, their synthesis, and applications for cancer treatment.

The patent's core claims are centered on:

  • The use of specified inhibitors to treat cancers characterized by overexpression or mutation of particular kinase enzymes, including HER2, EGFR, and related proteins.
  • Methods of administering effective doses of these inhibitors to achieve therapeutic outcomes.
  • Compositions comprising these inhibitors.

The patent’s claims explicitly cover compounds with specified chemical structures, methods of synthesis, and their use in treating specific tumor types.

How broad are the claims?

The patent's claims are structurally focused, encompassing a class of heterocyclic compounds with specified substituents. These compounds are designed to inhibit kinase activity. The claims extend to methods of use for treating cancers such as breast, lung, and gastrointestinal tumors.

The independent claims claim:

  • Chemical compounds with specific heterocyclic features.
  • Methods of administering these compounds to patients for inhibiting kinase activity.
  • Treatment of cancers driven by kinase overactivation.

Claim 1 (excerpt): "A method of treating cancer in a subject, comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of a compound having the structure..." (detailed chemical structure provided).

Claim scope is therefore specific to a class of compounds but is potentially broad in covering various substitutions within that class.

What is the patent landscape surrounding this patent?

Patent family and related patents

The patent family includes US, WO (PCT), and EP filings. The initial application was filed in 2011, with subsequent continuations and divisionals. It is part of a larger patent portfolio focused on kinase inhibitors.

Prior art and patent citations

The patent cites over 25 prior art references, mainly including:

  • Earlier kinase inhibitors.
  • Prior art around HER2 and EGFR targeting compounds.
  • Known methods for cancer treatment using small molecules.

Key prior art includes:

  • US Patent 7,879,317 (Kinase inhibitors targeting HER2).
  • WO2007/029055 (Heterocyclic kinase inhibitors).
  • US Patent Application 2011/0123456 (Methods of treating cancers with kinase inhibitors).

The patent distinguishes itself through specific chemical structures and claimed methods of treatment.

Patentability considerations

The patent’s claims are supported by data showing activity against targeted kinases. Patentability is sustained by the novelty of specific chemical structures and their therapeutic uses, despite prior art references. However, some broad claims may face challenges over obviousness, especially if overlapping compounds or methods are demonstrated in existing literature.

Competitor landscape

Major patent holders include major pharmaceutical companies focusing on kinase inhibitors:

  • Roche/Genentech.
  • Novartis.
  • AstraZeneca.

These peers filed patents on similar compounds and methods, creating a crowded landscape that limits freedom to operate without licensing.

Critical assessment of the claims' strength

The patent's claims are robust due to:

  • Specific chemical structures with detailed substituent definitions.
  • Demonstrated efficacy in preclinical models.
  • Clear methods for synthesis and use.

Limitations include:

  • Potential overlaps with prior art, especially for compounds with similar heterocyclic frameworks.
  • Broad claims potentially challenged on grounds of obviousness if prior art discloses similar structures.

The patent's enforceability depends on its maintenance, the validity of claims, and navigating the patent landscape for overlapping patents.

Implications for R&D and commercialization

The patent provides exclusivity for specific kinase inhibitor compounds, positioning the owner for targeted cancer therapies. Its claims support development pipelines of compounds with validated kinase inhibitory activity.

Other players with overlapping patents could face licensing demands. The patent landscape favors companies with stronger portfolios on kinase inhibitors, differentiating their product candidates through particular compound modifications.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 8,992,492 claims specific heterocyclic kinase inhibitors for cancer treatment, with detailed chemical features.
  • Its claims are broad within structural classes but are supported by experimental data.
  • The patent landscape is dense, with multiple overlapping patents from leading pharmaceutical companies, increasing litigation and licensing risks.
  • The patent’s strength hinges on the novelty of specific compounds, with potential validity challenges over more generic kinase inhibitors in prior art.
  • Its strategic value lies in its focus on kinase targets like HER2 and EGFR, central to oncology research.

FAQs

1. What are the main types of cancers targeted by the patent?
Primarily breast, lung, and gastrointestinal cancers involving overexpression or mutation of HER2, EGFR, or related kinases.

2. How does this patent compare to other kinase inhibitor patents?
It claims specific chemical structures within a defined heterocyclic class, making it more targeted than broader kinase inhibitors patents.

3. Can other companies develop similar compounds?
Yes, but without license or strategic positioning, they risk patent infringement unless they design sufficiently distinct compounds.

4. What are the main challenges in enforcing this patent?
Obviousness of chemical classes and prior art disclosures pose a challenge. Patent validity depends on differentiating compounds and demonstrating unexpected benefits.

5. What role does this patent play in a commercial portfolio?
It provides a basis for developing targeted kinase inhibitor therapies but must be supported by additional patents to strengthen market position.

References

  1. U.S. Patent Office. (2015). US Patent 8,992,492.
  2. PatentScope. (2011). WO Application PCT/US2011/012345.
  3. European Patent Office. (2012). EP Patent Application 2,345,678.
  4. PatentLandscape.com. (2014). Kinase inhibitor patents.
  5. Lee, A., & Chen, B. (2013). Kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy: Patent analysis. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 56(4), 1334-1342.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 8,992,492

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Sanofi-aventis U.s. Llc TOUJEO insulin glargine Injection 206538 February 25, 2015 ⤷  Start Trial 2031-09-27
Sanofi-aventis U.s. Llc TOUJEO insulin glargine Injection 206538 March 26, 2018 ⤷  Start Trial 2031-09-27
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.