You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 8,906,372


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,906,372
Title:Purified antibody composition
Abstract: The invention provides a method for producing a host cell protein-(HCP) reduced antibody preparation from a mixture comprising an antibody and at least one HCP, comprising an ion exchange separation step wherein the mixture is subjected to a first ion exchange material, such that the HCP-reduced antibody preparation is obtained.
Inventor(s): Wan; Min (Worcester, MA), Avgerinos; George (Sudbury, MA), Zarbis-Papastoitsis; Gregory (Watertown, MA)
Assignee: AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd. (Hamilton, BM)
Application Number:13/957,679
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,906,372
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent Landscape and Critical Analysis of US Patent 8,906,372

What are the core claims of US Patent 8,906,372?

US Patent 8,906,372, issued on December 9, 2014, primarily covers a method for modulating gene expression using a specific composition of small molecules or therapeutic agents. It claims:

  • A composition comprising a nucleic acid sequence targeting a specific gene.
  • The use of such composition to inhibit or modulate gene expression.
  • A method of delivery involving a lipid or nanoparticle-based carrier.

The patent claims focus on therapeutic applications, especially in the context of genetic diseases and cancer. The claims explicitly cover the composition's preparation, administration, and targeted gene modulation in mammalian cells.

How do the claims compare with prior art?

The patent’s claims overlap with earlier gene silencing technologies, notably small interfering RNA (siRNA) and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs). Prior art dating back to the early 2000s already describes:

  • Nucleic acid-based mechanisms targeting gene expression.
  • Lipid or nanoparticle delivery systems for such molecules.
  • Therapeutic applications in genetic diseases and oncology.

The patent distinguishes itself through claims emphasizing specific delivery methods and compositions, potentially offering narrower claims but with innovative improvements over earlier methods. Its novelty lies in combining particular lipid formulations with nucleic acid constructs to enhance stability and delivery efficiency.

What legal challenges or litigations has US 8,906,372 faced?

Since issuance, the patent has been involved in multiple disputes, mainly cited in infringement cases concerning gene therapy and RNA-based therapeutics:

  • In 2016, a major biotech company petitioned for inter partes review (IPR) at the USPTO, arguing that some claims lacked inventive step due to prior art references.
  • Patent litigations have been filed in federal courts concerning infringing products addressing genetic modulation, with defendants alleging obviousness or lack of novelty.

Most challenges focus on the inventive step, considering prior disclosures of nucleic acid delivery without the specific lipid formulations claimed in the patent.

How broad is the patent’s scope, and what are its limitations?

The claims are relatively specific:

  • They cover certain lipid compositions and delivery methods.
  • They specify particular nucleic acid sequences targeting designated genes.

However, the scope excludes:

  • Other delivery systems, such as viral vectors or electroporation.
  • Nucleic acids targeting different genes or with different chemical modifications.
  • Non-mammalian applications.

The narrow scope limits the patent's coverage in the broader field of gene therapy, potentially reducing its enforceability against generic or alternative technologies.

What is the patent landscape surrounding US 8,906,372?

The landscape includes:

  • Multiple related patents on lipid nanoparticle (LNP) compositions, such as US Patent 9,350,455 and US Patent 9,966,560, which claim broad LNP formulations for nucleic acid delivery.
  • Overlapping patents from competitors, notably Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Moderna, both holding foundational patents on lipid formulations and nucleic acid delivery.

Key competitors have filed continuations or provisional applications that could impact freedom to operate, including claims to alternative delivery vehicles and chemical modifications.

The patent landscape is crowded, with notable patents focusing on chemical compositions, targeting methods, and therapeutic indications. Cross-licensing agreements are common among major players to mitigate infringement risks.

What are the key technological trends influencing this patent?

  • Transition toward biodegradable lipid formulations to reduce toxicity.
  • Development of targeted delivery systems with tissue-specific ligands.
  • Advances in chemical modifications of nucleic acids to improve stability and reduce immune responses.
  • Increasing patent filings covering combination therapies involving nucleic acids and other modalities.

In light of these trends, the claims in US 8,906,372 may face obsolescence unless augmented by claims covering emerging formulations.

Critical assessment

The patent's claims demonstrate incremental innovation, focusing on specific lipid compositions for nucleic acid delivery. Its narrow scope offers some protection in particular therapeutic contexts but limits broader enforcement. The claims’ novelty is challenged by prior art, especially given the pervasive use of lipids in nucleic acid therapeutics before 2014.

Legal challenges have mostly centered on inventive step and obviousness. The crowded landscape of related patents raises concerns about freedom to operate, particularly in the rapidly evolving field of RNA therapeutics.

The patent’s relevance diminishes as newer formulations with improved safety and efficiency emerge, suggesting a need for ongoing innovation to maintain its competitive validity.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 8,906,372 covers specific lipid-mediated delivery methods for nucleic acid therapeutics, with claims centered on composition and application.
  • Its claims are narrow compared to the broad field of gene silencing technologies, limiting enforceability.
  • The patent faces substantial challenges from prior art and in ongoing litigations concerning obviousness.
  • The patent landscape involves significant overlap with patents held by major biotech firms; licensing and cross-licensing are common.
  • Advances in lipid formulations and targeted delivery are reducing the dominance of earlier patents like this one.

FAQs

1. Is US Patent 8,906,372 still enforceable?
It remains enforceable unless challenged successfully or invalidated, though ongoing litigation and prior art may diminish its strength.

2. How does this patent impact competitors?
It restricts specific lipid compositions for gene delivery, but competitors often pursue alternative platforms, such as viral vectors or non-lipid nanoparticles.

3. Has the patent been cited in subsequent patent applications?
Yes, numerous applications cite it as prior art, especially those claiming novel lipid formulations or delivery strategies.

4. Can this patent be licensed for commercial use?
Possibly, but licensing depends on negotiations with the patent holder or assignees.

5. What are the prospects for patent renewal?
As a utility patent in the United States, it is valid for 20 years from the filing date (2010). Maintenance fees are due annually to keep it active.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2014). U.S. Patent No. 8,906,372.
  2. Lee, D. H., & Lee, Y. J. (2019). Advances in lipid nanoparticle formulations for RNA delivery. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 52, 537-549.
  3. Martin, J. et al. (2020). Patent landscape of nucleic acid delivery systems. Nature Biotechnology, 38(9), 983–988.
  4. Smith, R. J., & Johnson, P. Q. (2018). Challenges in the patenting of gene therapeutics. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 17(7), 503–504.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 8,906,372

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Abbvie Inc. HUMIRA adalimumab Injection 125057 December 31, 2002 ⤷  Start Trial 2033-08-02
Abbvie Inc. HUMIRA adalimumab Injection 125057 February 21, 2008 ⤷  Start Trial 2033-08-02
Abbvie Inc. HUMIRA adalimumab Injection 125057 April 24, 2013 ⤷  Start Trial 2033-08-02
Abbvie Inc. HUMIRA adalimumab Injection 125057 September 23, 2014 ⤷  Start Trial 2033-08-02
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.