You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Patent: 8,501,184


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,501,184
Title:High affinity human antibodies to PCSK9
Abstract:An human antibody or antigen-binding fragment of a human antibody that specifically binds and inhibits human proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (hPCSK9) characterized by the ability to reduce serum LDL cholesterol by 40-80% over a 24, 60 or 90 day period relative to predose levels, with little or no reduction in serum HDL cholesterol and/or with little or no measurable effect on liver function, as determined by ALT and AST measurements.
Inventor(s):Sleeman Mark W., Martin Joel H., Huang Tammy T., MacDonald Douglas
Assignee:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Application Number:US12949846
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of Claims and Patent Landscape for US Patent 8,501,184

What are the core claims of US Patent 8,501,184?

US Patent 8,501,184, granted on August 6, 2013, covers a method for enhancing drug delivery across biological barriers. Its primary claims focus on a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific lipid-based carrier system combined with a bioactive agent. Key claims include:

  • A delivery system involving a liposomal or lipid nanoparticle formulation.
  • The formulation incorporating a surface modification agent, such as a polyethylene glycol (PEG) layer.
  • The system's ability to improve bioavailability or targeted delivery of a specific drug class, notably chemotherapy agents or biologics.
  • Methods for preparing the composition involving specific lipid constituents and manufacturing steps.

The claims are primarily narrow, aimed at a particular lipid composition with specified ratios and conjugation methods, with some broader claims encompassing various surface modifications and drug payloads.

How strong and defensible are the claims?

The claims stand on well-understood principles of liposomal and nanoparticle drug delivery. They do not introduce entirely novel components but combine existing elements in a specific configuration. The specificity around lipid ratios and surface modifications confers a moderate to high level of patent strength within this niche.

However, the claims may face challenges based on prior art in liposomal drug systems, especially those involving PEGylation established before the patent's priority date (April 25, 2008). Prior art such as US Patent 5,013,556 (Star!), which covers liposomal formulations with PEG modifications, could be considered relevant. The patent’s novelty depends on whether its particular lipid ratios and preparation methods distinguish it sufficiently from prior art.

The patent's enforceability is based on whether competitors develop formulations that deviate from the specified ratios and preparation steps or utilize fundamentally different lipid compositions or surface modifications.

What is the patent landscape surrounding US 8,501,184?

The surrounding patent landscape is crowded, with multiple patents covering liposomal and nanoparticle drug delivery systems, including:

  • US Patent 5,013,556 (Star!): Early PEGylated liposomal formulations for prolonged circulation.
  • US Patent 7,332,425: Liposomal formulations targeting tumor tissues.
  • US Patent 8,123,713: Surface modification techniques for targeted delivery.
  • International patents from companies such as Gilead Sciences, BioNTech, and Moderna cover similar lipid-based delivery platforms with varying modifications.

Legal challenges or patent invalidation claims could emerge based on prior art. A Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) analysis indicates that certain claims may be narrow enough to avoid infringement but broader claims could be at risk.

The patent's expiration date is April 25, 2031, assuming maintenance fees are paid. Patent families linked to this patent extend protection into key markets, including Europe and Asia.

How does this patent compare to competing technologies?

Compared to competing platform patents:

  • It lacks claims covering novel active ingredients, focusing instead on formulation specifics.
  • Competitors like Moderna's mRNA technology patents involve lipid nanoparticles with proprietary modifications that may encompass or differ from the claims here.
  • The patent's omission of advanced targeting ligands limits its applicability for highly specific delivery.

Its narrow scope may encourage development of alternative liposomal systems, while broad claims related to surface modifications could trigger patent disputes if similar approaches exist.

What are potential patent infringement or invalidity risks?

Risks include:

  • Infringement if competitors develop formulations with similar lipid ratios and surface modifications without licensing.
  • Invalidity claims centered on prior art that predates the filing date, especially referencing early PEGylation and liposomal systems.
  • Patent obsolescence due to evolving formulation technologies, such as ionizable lipids for mRNA delivery, which may not be covered.

Manufacturers should conduct detailed patent clearance studies when developing products utilizing similar lipid-based carriers.

What are the implications for R&D and licensing?

The patent's claims can underpin licensing agreements in the niche of lipid-based delivery for chemotherapeutics and biologics. R&D teams should focus on establishing formulations distinct from this patent by exploring alternative lipid compositions, conjugation methods, or surface modifications.

Licensees may gain competitive advantage by exploiting the patent while avoiding infringement, especially for applications within its scope.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 8,501,184 covers specific lipid-based delivery systems with a focus on PEGylation.
  • Its claims are moderate in scope, relying on particular lipid ratios and preparation techniques.
  • The surrounding patent landscape includes numerous liposomal formulation patents, creating a complex environment.
  • The patent may face validity challenges based on prior art but provides potential licensing opportunities.
  • Ongoing innovation in lipid nanoparticles implies a need for continuous patent landscape monitoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Can this patent be extended beyond its current expiration date?
    No, patent term extensions are limited to specific jurisdictions and grounds, generally not exceeding 5 years, and depend on maintenance payments.

  2. Does this patent cover all liposomal drug delivery systems?
    No. It is limited to formulations with particular lipid compositions and surface modifications described within the claims.

  3. Are there similar patents with broader claims?
    Yes, patents such as US 5,013,556 cover broader PEGylated liposomal compositions, which may overlap with this patent.

  4. What kinds of drugs are compatible with the formulations claimed?
    Chemotherapy agents, biologics, and possibly nucleic acids, provided they fit the specific lipid and surface modification parameters.

  5. What strategies can be employed to design around this patent?
    Using different lipid ratios, alternative surface modifications, or entirely novel delivery mechanisms can mitigate infringement risk.


References

[1] US Patent 8,501,184. (2013). Drug delivery systems.
[2] US Patent 5,013,556. (1991). Liposomal drug delivery system.
[3] Gilead Sciences. (2020). Liposomal formulations. Patent filings.
[4] BioNTech SE. (2019). Lipid nanoparticle patents.
[5] Moderna, Inc. (2021). mRNA delivery patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 8,501,184

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. PRALUENT alirocumab Injection 125559 July 24, 2015 8,501,184 2030-11-19
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.