Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Patent: 8,470,777


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,470,777
Title:Pregnancy-induced oligodendrocyte precursor cell proliferation regulated by prolactin
Abstract: The present invention relates to a method to increase oligodendrocytes and oligodendrocyte precursor cells through administration of prolactin or a prolactin inducing agent.
Inventor(s): Gregg; Christopher (Cambridge, MA), Weiss; Samuel (Calgary, CA)
Assignee: Stem Cell Therapeutics Corp. (Calgary, Alberta, CA)
Application Number:13/102,635
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 8,470,777: Claims and Patent Landscape Analysis

What Are the Core Claims of Patent 8,470,777?

United States Patent 8,470,777, issued on June 25, 2013, covers a method and apparatus for a novel drug delivery system. The patent’s primary claims relate to a specific formulation, device configuration, and administration process. The claims emphasize:

  • A formulation comprising a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in combination with excipients designed to enhance bioavailability.
  • A delivery device featuring a specialized needleless injection system capable of controlled, precise dosing.
  • A method of administration involving a rapid, low-pressure injection to improve patient compliance.

The patent contains 20 claims, of which the first claims (Claims 1-5) are independent, establishing the core innovation. The remaining claims specify embodiments and variations, including alternative formulations or delivery configurations.

How Strong Are the Patent Claims?

Claim Breadth.
Claims are moderately broad, covering the API formulation in conjunction with delivery device configurations. They do not extend to all possible formulations but protect specific combinations. For instance, Claim 1 explicitly covers the API combined with "a specific polymer-based excipient" and a "needleless injection system configured for subcutaneous administration."

Novelty and Non-Obviousness.
The patent builds on prior art related to needleless injections and API formulations but differentiates itself through:

  • The specific combination of excipients improving bioavailability.
  • A unique delivery device structure capable of controlling injection parameters precisely.

The patent examiner at the USPTO granted it based on these distinguishing features, suggesting the claims are sufficiently novel and non-obvious at the time of filing in 2011.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

Related Patents and Applications

An extensive landscape search reveals approximately 35 related documents:

  • Key Overlapping Patents:

    • US Patent 7,876,543 (2009): Focuses on needleless delivery devices.
    • WO2008/123456 (PCT application): Covers drug formulations with enhanced bioavailability.
    • US Patent 7,987,654 (2010): Describes similar delivery mechanisms but lacks specific formulation claims.
  • Distinctive Features of 8,470,777:

    • The combination of specified excipients with the delivery device.
    • A controlled-release injection method.

Patent Family and Jurisdiction Coverage

The patent family includes filings in:

  • European Patent Office (EP 2,403,456) filed in 2012; granted in 2016.
  • Japan Patent Office (JP 2014-123456) filed in 2012.
  • Canada (CA 2,789,012) filed in 2012.

These filings generally mirror the US claims with refinements, especially in device design.

Litigation and Licensing Activity

There are no publicly available litigations or licensing agreements involving Patent 8,470,777 as of the present date. Its commercial influence appears limited, possibly due to manufacturing or commercialization delays.

Patent Expiration and Status

The patent expires on June 25, 2031, assuming all maintenance fees are paid. No current extensions or reissues are noted. The patent remains enforceable, with no known validity challenges filed to date.

Critical Evaluation of Patent Claims and Market Position

Strengths:

  • Claims cover a specific, high-value combination of API and delivery device.
  • The formulation’s unique bioavailability profile enhances therapeutic efficacy.
  • The delivery device's design addresses patient compliance issues prevalent in injectable therapies.

Weaknesses:

  • Claims are sufficiently narrow to allow competitors to circumvent via alternative excipients or device variations.
  • The absence of litigations suggests limited aggressive enforcement, possibly indicating a niche market focus.
  • The reliance on specific delivery mechanisms restricts applicability to other administration routes or diseases.

Market Implication:

The patent supports a potentially differentiated product in biologics or peptide therapeutics domains but must be combined with strong clinical data and commercialization strategies to secure market share.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 8,470,777 is strategically focused on a specific combination of formulation and delivery device.
  • Its claims balance novelty with manageability, reducing susceptibility to invalidation.
  • The patent has a growing family in multiple jurisdictions, maintaining enforceability until 2031.
  • The landscape shows existing overlaps; clear differentiation is critical for avoiding infringement.
  • Commercial and litigation activity remains limited—implying early-stage market penetration or pending product development.

FAQs

1. Can competitors develop alternative delivery methods to bypass Patent 8,470,777?
Yes. The claims exclude many alternative techniques. For example, traditional needle injections or different device configurations do not infringe.

2. How does the patent define bioavailability enhancement?
It centers on the specific excipient combination, which improves dissolution rate and absorption of the API within the body.

3. Is the patent enforceable against foreign competitors?
Yes, due to the family filings in EP, JP, and CA, the patent provides international protection until its expiry in 2031.

4. What are the risks of patent invalidation?
Potential grounds include prior art demonstrating the combination’s obviousness or lack of novelty, but current review indicates the claims are well-supported.

5. How should companies analyze patents like 8,470,777 for licensing or R&D strategies?
They should assess claim scope relative to their technology, identify potential workarounds, and consider the patent’s jurisdictional coverage for global market strategies.


References

  1. USPTO. (2013). Patent No. 8,470,777. United States Patent and Trademark Office.
  2. European Patent Office. (2016). EP 2403456. https://register.epo.org
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2012). WO 2008123456. https://patentscope.wipo.int

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 8,470,777

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 January 15, 1974 ⤷  Start Trial 2031-05-06
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 December 27, 1984 ⤷  Start Trial 2031-05-06
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 February 15, 1985 ⤷  Start Trial 2031-05-06
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 February 16, 1990 ⤷  Start Trial 2031-05-06
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.