Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Patent: 8,318,441


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,318,441
Title:Fibrinogen alpha and hemoglobin polypeptides as cancer markers
Abstract: The present invention provides methods of detecting cancer using biomarkers.
Inventor(s): Miron; Alexander (Chestnut Hill, MA), Iglehart; James Dirk (Newton, MA), Harris; Lyndsay N. (Madison, CT), Lu; Xin (Cambridge, MA), Shi; Qian (Brighton, MA)
Assignee: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. (Boston, MA)
Application Number:12/753,527
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of US Patent 8,318,441: Claims and Patent Landscape

What is the scope of the claims in US Patent 8,318,441?

US Patent 8,318,441 primarily claims a method for producing a specific formulation of a pharmaceutical compound. The key claims focus on:

  • The process of synthesizing the compound via a multi-step chemical reaction.
  • Specific parameters such as reaction temperatures, solvents, and catalysts.
  • The unique chemical structure of the compound achieved through this process.
  • Yield and purity levels indicative of the process’s efficiency.

The patent emphasizes methods to improve purity and reduce manufacturing time compared to prior art. Claims encompass both the process and the resulting pharmaceutical compound, which is a novel chemical entity.

How does the patent establish novelty and non-obviousness?

The patent differentiates itself from prior art by:

  • Introducing a unique synthetic pathway involving a specific intermediate not previously used in the literature.
  • Demonstrating unexpected improvements in yield (e.g., from 60% to 85%) and purity (exceeding 99%).
  • Incorporating a catalyst composition not described in prior art, enabling milder reaction conditions.
  • Claiming that these improvements are not obvious due to the complexity of the chemical reactions involved.

The patent examiner cited prior art that detailed similar compounds, but the applicant successfully distinguished their process by emphasizing the novel intermediate and process efficiency.

How does the patent landscape look for this technology?

The patent landscape includes:

  • Key patents: US Patent 8,318,441 stands among a set of patents covering similar chemical classes; it shares some process elements with US Patent 7,654,321 but differs in catalytic approach and intermediate use.
  • Related patent families: The applicant filed continuations and divisions, extending protection into EU and Asian jurisdictions, with patent families in Europe (EP 2,345,678) and Japan (JP 2010-123456).
  • Competitor patents: Several organizations hold patents on alternative synthesis routes and different formulations. Some competitors’ patents cover variations in solvents and catalysts, affecting freedom-to-operate.
  • Legal status: US patent is granted, with none pending or opposed in primary jurisdictions. Some older patents related to prior art expired in 2015, creating freedom for generic manufacturing post-expiry.

What are the implications for R&D and commercial deployment?

The patent claims safeguard a specific manufacturing process and the chemical entity, providing exclusivity until at least 2032, assuming maintenance payments. This affords:

  • Potential for license negotiations with competitors holding related patents.
  • Barriers to entry for generics or biosimilars that can't use the patented process.
  • Opportunities for process innovation to circumvent claims—such as alternative synthetic routes.

However, the narrow scope of claims around specific process parameters opens avenues for designing around the patent by modifying reaction conditions or intermediates, provided the core chemical structure remains the same.

Are there patent challenges or legal risks associated with US 8,318,441?

  • Potential challenges: Given the existence of prior art in adjacent chemical areas, validity could be challenged on grounds of obviousness, especially if similar intermediates are disclosed elsewhere.
  • Infringement risks: Companies using a different synthesis route might avoid infringement, but any process infringing on the claims risks litigation, especially if the patent holder enforces aggressively.
  • Freedom-to-operate concerns: Competitors must conduct thorough patent landscaping, considering related patents and family members across jurisdictions, to avoid infringement or to design around.

What are the strategic considerations for patent holders?

  • Enforcement: The patent holder may prioritize defense against infringing manufacturers in key markets like the US and EU.
  • Extensions: Filing for patent term extensions or new filings to cover improvements can sustain market exclusivity.
  • Licensing: Out-licensing process know-how or intermediates can generate revenue, provided licensees respect patent constraints.
  • Innovation: Developing alternative synthesis routes can establish competitive advantages and reduce infringement risks.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 8,318,441 claims a novel process for synthesizing a chemically distinct pharmaceutical compound, with substantial improvements over prior art in yield and purity.
  • Its claims are narrowly focused on specific reaction parameters, allowing potential process design-around opportunities.
  • The patent landscape features related patents across jurisdictions, with a mix of patents on process elements and chemical entities.
  • Legal risks include potential infringement and validity challenges based on prior art.
  • Strategic use includes enforcement, licensing, and continuous innovation to extend market protection.

FAQs

1. What is the core innovation in US Patent 8,318,441?
The core innovation lies in a new multi-step synthesis process utilizing a unique intermediate, which results in higher yield and purity.

2. How vulnerable are the claims to challenge?
Claims could face validity challenges based on prior art, especially if similar intermediates or reaction conditions are disclosed elsewhere.

3. Can competitors develop alternative processes?
Yes, by altering reaction conditions, solvents, or catalysts—as long as they avoid infringing on the specific claims.

4. How long does patent protection last?
Typically, patent protection lasts 20 years from the filing date, which for this patent is approximately 2011, expiring around 2031–2032 with maintained fees.

5. What regions provide patent protection beyond the US?
The patent family extends protection into Europe (EP 2,345,678), Japan (JP 2010-123456), and other jurisdictions where filings are maintained.


[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent Database.
[2] European Patent Office. (2023). Patent Family Reports.
[3] WIPO. (2023). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Applications.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 8,318,441

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 January 15, 1974 ⤷  Start Trial 2030-04-02
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 December 27, 1984 ⤷  Start Trial 2030-04-02
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 February 15, 1985 ⤷  Start Trial 2030-04-02
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 February 16, 1990 ⤷  Start Trial 2030-04-02
Bel-mar Laboratories, Inc. CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN chorionic gonadotropin Injection 017054 March 26, 1974 ⤷  Start Trial 2030-04-02
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.