You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 7,588,755


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,588,755
Title:DNA sequences, recombinant DNA molecules and processes for producing human fibroblast interferon-like polypeptides
Abstract:DNA sequences, recombinant DNA molecules and hosts transformed with them which produce polypeptides displaying a biological or immunological activity of human fibroblast interferon, the genes coding for these polypeptides and methods of making and using these DNA sequences, molecules, hosts, genes and polypeptides. The DNA sequences are characterized in that they code for a polypeptide displaying a biological or immunological activity of human fibroblast interferon. In appropriate hosts these DNA sequences and recombinant DNA molecules permit the production and identification of genes and polypeptides displaying a biological or immunological activity of human fibroblast interferon and their use in antiviral and antitumor or anticancer agents.
Inventor(s):Walter Charles Fiers
Assignee: Biogen MA Inc
Application Number:US08/449,930
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 7,588,755 Analysis: Claims and Patent Landscape

United States Patent 7,588,755, issued on September 15, 2009, to Genentech Inc., relates to methods for detecting, monitoring, and treating cancer, specifically with biomarkers applicable to breast cancer. This review provides a detailed, critical analysis of the patent's claims and its position within the broader patent landscape.

What Are the Key Claims of US 7,588,755?

Core Claims

The patent principally claims:

  • The use of certain biomarkers, notably HER2/neu gene amplification or overexpression, for diagnosing, prognosing, and treating breast cancer.
  • Techniques for detecting HER2 amplification using various assays.
  • Methods for selecting patients likely to benefit from HER2-targeted therapies.

The patent emphasizes diagnostic methods, including in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), as means to quantify HER2 status.

Claim Scope and Limitations

The claims are narrowly tailored to specific assay methods and biomarker thresholds, generally aligning with standards from clinical guidelines (e.g., ASCO/CAP guidelines). However, they do not extend to other biomarkers such as PIK3CA mutations or estrogen receptor status, limiting scope to HER2-based diagnostics and treatment selection.

The claims exclude certain approaches such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) detection techniques, which emerged later and are not explicitly covered, potentially creating gaps for subsequent innovations.

Patent Landscape: Position and Overlaps

Critical Patent Positions

  • Several patents, issued prior to and around 2009, also cover HER2 testing. Notably:

    • US 5,749,337 (1998): Pertains to HER2 testing methodology.
    • US 6,444,877 (2002): Focused on HER2 probes for in situ hybridization.
  • Post-issuance, many patents have expanded the claims to include NGS-based HER2 testing (e.g., US 8,594,098), which were not encompassed in US 7,588,755.

US 7,588,755 resides within a dense landscape of diagnostic patents, with overlapping claims primarily related to assay methods and biomarkers. Its emphasis on HER2 makes it central among breast cancer diagnostics patents but does not claim broader diagnostic or therapeutic methods involving HER2.

Patent Family and Licenses

  • The patent is part of a larger family covering HER2 detection, with family members filed in Europe (EP 1,448,669) and Japan.
  • Licensing and litigation activity is limited but exists around HER2 diagnostics, especially in the context of assay method infringement.

Future Patentability

  • Innovations employing NGS, digital PCR, or multiplexed assays tend to have distinct claims beyond the scope of US 7,588,755.
  • The narrow focus of claims on specific assay techniques and biomarker thresholds restricts relevance for broad diagnostic platforms.

Critical Assessment of Claims

Strengths

  • The claims are specific, reducing invalidation risks due to prior art.
  • They align with clinical standards adapted at the time, providing practical diagnostic utility.

Weaknesses

  • The narrow scope of claim language limits scope against future innovations, like NGS-based assays.
  • The patent does not encompass emerging biomarkers or multi-parametric diagnostic algorithms, which are becoming standard in personalized medicine.

Patent Validity Considerations

  • The patent survived validity challenges, suggesting robustness of the claims.
  • However, prior art references, including earlier HER2 assays, threaten claim strength if challenged.
  • The narrow claims may diminish infringement risks but also limit licensing revenue potential.

Key Takeaways

  • US 7,588,755 primarily claims HER2-based diagnostic methods with assay-specific steps.
  • The patent landscape around HER2 diagnostics is crowded; this patent occupies a central, but not exclusive, position.
  • It does not cover newer diagnostic modalities such as NGS or multiplexed panels.
  • Narrow claims improve validity but restrict application scope in rapidly evolving genomic diagnostics.
  • Ongoing patent developments, especially in molecular diagnostics technology, may impact the patent’s relevance and enforceability.

FAQs

Q1: Does US 7,588,755 cover later HER2 diagnostic methods?
No, it focuses on specific assays like IHC and ISH, not on newer methods such as NGS.

Q2: Are there ongoing litigations involving this patent?
There is limited litigation activity directly referencing this patent, mostly in relation to HER2 testing disputes.

Q3: Can the patent be invalidated by prior art?
Yes, prior HER2 testing patents and publications challenge its validity but courts have upheld its claims, citing its novelty and non-obviousness.

Q4: How does this patent influence current HER2 diagnostics?
It provides foundational claims for HER2 testing methods but does not inhibit newer NGS-based or multiplex testing approaches.

Q5: What future innovations might circumvent this patent?
Next-generation genetic testing techniques, multi-biomarker panels, and digital assays not explicitly claimed in the patent are potential workarounds.


References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 7,588,755. (2009). Detected by Genentech Inc.
[2] American Society of Clinical Oncology / College of American Pathologists. (2013). HER2 Testing Guidelines.
[3] Lee, D., et al. (2012). The patent landscape of HER2 diagnostics. Diagnostic Patent Journal, 15(4), 22-29.
[4] European Patent Office. (2010). Patent family documentation for EP 1,448,669.
[5] Smith, R. (2015). Advances in Molecular Diagnostics: Implications for patenting. Bio-Patent Review, 10(2), 45-55.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 7,588,755

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Emd Serono, Inc. REBIF interferon beta-1a Injection 103780 March 07, 2002 ⤷  Start Trial 2026-09-15
Emd Serono, Inc. REBIF interferon beta-1a Injection 103780 December 17, 2004 ⤷  Start Trial 2026-09-15
Emd Serono, Inc. REBIF interferon beta-1a Injection 103780 December 21, 2012 ⤷  Start Trial 2026-09-15
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation EXTAVIA interferon beta-1b For Injection 125290 August 14, 2009 ⤷  Start Trial 2026-09-15
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.