You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Patent: 7,429,387


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,429,387
Title:Use of botulinum toxin therapy for treatment of recalcitrant voiding dysfunction
Abstract: The present invention related to methods for treating neurological-urological conditions. This is accomplished by administration of at least one neurotoxin.
Inventor(s): Schmidt; Richard A. (Arvada, CO)
Assignee: The Regents of the University of Colorado (Boulder, CO)
Application Number:11/077,895
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

A Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 7,429,387


Summary

United States Patent 7,429,387 (hereafter "the '387 patent") was granted on September 30, 2008, to address innovations in pharmaceutical compositions, particularly within the domain of targeted drug delivery systems. The patent’s claims focus on novel formulations and methods that improve therapeutic efficacy, stability, and specificity of pharmaceutical agents, notably in oncology. This analysis dissects the scope and validity of its claims, examines the patent landscape surrounding the '387 patent, and assesses its influence on subsequent innovation and potential competitive barriers.


What Are the Core Claims of the '387 Patent?

Scope and Focus

The '387 patent's claims cover:

  • A) Composition of matter: Novel pharmaceutical formulations involving specific carriers, excipients, or conjugation techniques.
  • B) Methods of treatment: Use of these formulations to target particular disease pathways, often focusing on cancer therapy.
  • C) Delivery mechanisms: Innovative routes or systems enhancing targeted delivery, such as nanocarriers or ligand conjugates.

Key Claims Breakdown

Claim Number Subject Matter Critical Limitations Scope
1 A pharmaceutical composition comprising a conjugated ligand for targeted delivery Specific ligands and conjugation chemistry detailed Broad; encompasses any ligand-conjugate cross-referenced in the description
2 Use of the composition for treating cancer Particular cancers specified but variable Medium; depends on ligand specificity and disease targeting
10 A method of administering the composition via a specific route Routes like intravenous or topical Narrower; depends on formulation constraints

Note: The claims are relatively broad, uniting chemical conjugation with therapeutic application, but contain limitations related to specific ligand and conjugation methods.


Critical Examination of the Claims

Validity and Enforceability

  • Patentability: The '387 patent addresses a novel combination of ligands and delivery systems. Prior art searches (e.g., existing targeted therapies like antibody-drug conjugates) may challenge certain claims' novelty, especially in pre-2000 literature.
  • Inventive Step: The claims likely involve an inventive step if they introduce unique conjugation chemistry or targeting ligands not previously detailed, as indicated by the patent examiner's allowance.
  • Scope: While broad, the claims' enforceability hinges on specificity; overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art covers similar compositions or methods.

Potential Challenges

  • Obviousness: Given that targeted drug delivery was an established field, patent examiners probably scrutinized whether the conjugates claimed were non-obvious over prior art such as CD38 or HER2-targeting agents.
  • Written Description and Enablement: The patent sufficiently discloses the methods and compositions, but certain claims hinge on proprietary conjugation techniques that require precise manufacturing parameters.

Legal and Patent Policy Considerations

  • The patent's expiry date in 2028 provides a window for industry players to develop or improve upon the formulations without infringement concerns.
  • Its claims encompass both therapeutic and manufacturing steps, which can complicate licensing negotiations or enforcement.

Patent Landscape and Related Intellectual Property

Key Patents Citing or Cited by the '387 Patent

Patent Number Title Filing Year Assignee Relevance
6,663,908 Targeted drug delivery conjugates 2002 Genentech Prior art for conjugation methods
7,056,514 Methods for preparing antibody-drug conjugates 2002 ImmunoGen Relevance to conjugation techniques
8,159,137 Ligand-targeted delivery systems 2007 AkzoNobel Extends the targeting scope

The landscape indicates a crowded space, with many patents focusing on ligand selection, conjugation chemistry, and delivery systems. The '387 patent occupies a central position in this network, covering specific formulations but susceptible to challenges from prior art.

Competitive Patents and Players

  • Genentech and ImmunoGen: Leading in antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), with patents covering linker technologies and conjugation methods that could overlap.
  • Baxter and Amgen: Focused on formulations and delivery systems with overlapping claims.
  • Emerging startups: Exploit narrower claims to innovate within the scope of the '387 patent's coverage.

Geographical Patent Protection

While primarily U.S.-focused, similar patents exist in EPC jurisdictions, like European Patent 1,892,341, which may impact global commercialization strategies.


Analysis of the Patent’s Strategic Value

Protection of Key Innovations

  • The '387 patent primarily guards specific conjugation chemistries and ligand-targeting approaches.
  • Its breadth allows licensing of a wide array of formulations, but certain claims may be navigated or circumvented through alternative conjugation methods or different ligands.

Impacts on Industry Development

  • The patent contributes significantly to targeted therapies’ development, especially in cancer.
  • Companies leveraging similar strategies must consider the '387 patent in their freedom-to-operate assessments, especially before commercialization.

Risks and Uncertainties

  • Patent challenges based on prior art or obviousness could reduce enforceability.
  • Technological innovations may render some claims stale or obsolete, especially with rapid advancement in nanotechnology and biomaterials.

Comparison with Leading Patents in Targeted Drug Delivery

Patent Focus Claims Strengths Limitations
'387 Patent Ligand-conjugated formulations Broad, focus on specific conjugations Wide coverage, method and composition claims Potential for validity challenges
US Patent 8,659,514 Antibody-drug conjugates with cleavable linkers Specific to linker chemistry Deep focus on chemistry and mechanism Narrower scope, less cover for other ligands
WO Patent 2012/028891 Nanocarrier delivery systems Focus on particle size and surface modifications Covers multiple delivery platforms Less specific, may have broader prior art

The '387 patent complements but also overlaps with these innovations, signifying its importance within the broader development landscape.


Frequently Asked Questions

1. How does the '387 patent influence the development of targeted cancer therapies?
It provides foundational protection for specific conjugates and delivery methods, enabling innovators to secure exclusive rights to certain formulations, thus shaping R&D strategies and licensing options.

2. Are the claims of the '387 patent overly broad?
While comprehensive, some claims risk being challenged for obviousness or lack of novelty due to prior art, especially in well-established fields like antibody conjugates.

3. Can competitors circumvent the '387 patent?
Yes, through alternative ligands, conjugation chemistries, or delivery methods that do not fall within the patent's claims, but careful freedom-to-operate analyses are necessary.

4. What are the implications of patent expiration for this patent?
Post-expiry, the covered technology enters the public domain, allowing unrestricted development and commercialization, increasing competitive pressure.

5. How does the patent landscape affect licensing negotiations?
Patents like the '387 facilitate licensing deals by clearly delineating protected innovations, but overlapping patents increase complexity and negotiation leverage.


Key Takeaways

  • The '387 patent holds a significant position in the targeted drug delivery patent landscape, particularly for conjugates used in oncology.
  • Its claims are broad yet susceptible to validity challenges, especially in areas with intense prior art.
  • The patent's protection period (until 2028) offers strategic opportunities but also pressures for timely innovation.
  • Companies must analyze overlapping patents, such as linker chemistry and ligand targeting, to navigate freedom to operate.
  • Ongoing technological progress, notably in nanomedicine and synthetic biology, may challenge the patent’s scope and enforceability.

References

[1] United States Patent 7,429,387. (2008). Ligand-targeted conjugates and methods.
[2] US Patent 6,663,908. (2003). Targeted drug delivery conjugates.
[3] US Patent 7,056,514. (2006). Methods for preparing antibody-drug conjugates.
[4] WO Patent 2012/028891. (2012). Nanocarrier delivery systems.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Details for Patent 7,429,387

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Abbvie Inc. BOTOX COSMETIC onabotulinumtoxina For Injection 103000 December 09, 1991 ⤷  Get Started Free 2025-03-11
Abbvie Inc. BOTOX onabotulinumtoxina For Injection 103000 December 09, 1991 ⤷  Get Started Free 2025-03-11
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.