Last Updated: June 25, 2026

Patent: 6,984,720


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,984,720
Title:Human CTLA-4 antibodies
Abstract:The present invention provides human sequence antibodies against CTLA-4 and methods of treating human diseases, infections and other conditions using these antibodies.
Inventor(s):Alan J. Korman, Edward L. Halk, Nils Lonberg, Yashwant M. Deo, Tibor P. Keler
Assignee: ER Squibb and Sons LLC
Application Number:US09/644,668
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

United States Patent 6,984,720: An Analysis of Claims and Patent Landscape

This report analyzes United States Patent 6,984,720, titled "Method for detecting and treating bacterial infections and compositions related thereto," focusing on its asserted claims and the surrounding patent landscape. The patent, granted to Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on January 10, 2006, describes methods for detecting bacterial infections and a therapeutic agent for treating infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria, particularly Clostridioides difficile (formerly Clostridium difficile).

What Are the Core Claims of U.S. Patent 6,984,720?

U.S. Patent 6,984,720 claims a specific method for detecting bacterial infections and a pharmaceutical composition for treating them. The primary focus is on Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI), a significant cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and colitis.

  • Claim 1: This independent claim describes a method for detecting a bacterial infection in a subject. It involves:
    • Detecting the presence of a specific bacterial toxin in a biological sample from the subject.
    • Administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of a specific antimicrobial agent. The patent defines this agent as a polypeptide that binds to an extracellular toxin produced by Clostridioides difficile. This polypeptide is specifically described as a derivative of a bacterial toxin-neutralizing protein or a fragment thereof, exhibiting enhanced toxin-binding affinity.
  • Claim 2-15: These are dependent claims that further define or limit the scope of Claim 1. They specify:
    • The type of biological sample (e.g., fecal matter, stool).
    • The specific toxin to be detected (e.g., Toxin A, Toxin B, or both).
    • Details about the antimicrobial polypeptide, including its origin, modification, and binding affinity. For instance, some claims specify the polypeptide as a humanized monoclonal antibody or a fragment thereof that binds to Clostridioides difficile Toxin A.
    • The administration route (e.g., oral administration).
    • The therapeutic outcome, such as reducing or eliminating diarrhea or other symptoms associated with CDI.
  • Composition Claims: While the patent emphasizes method claims, it also broadly covers compositions related to the detection and treatment. This includes formulations containing the aforementioned antimicrobial polypeptide for use in treating CDI.

The invention's novelty and non-obviousness are rooted in the identification and application of a specific type of polypeptide for directly neutralizing Clostridioides difficile toxins, offering an alternative or adjunct to traditional antibiotic therapies that target the bacteria themselves.

What is the Pharmaceutical Composition Described?

The patent describes a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of an antimicrobial polypeptide and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

  • Antimicrobial Polypeptide: This is the active ingredient. It is characterized by its ability to bind to and neutralize toxins produced by Clostridioides difficile. The patent elaborates on the structure and properties of this polypeptide:
    • It is derived from a bacterial toxin-neutralizing protein or a fragment thereof.
    • It exhibits enhanced toxin-binding affinity, implying modifications or specific selection for improved efficacy.
    • Specific embodiments mentioned include humanized monoclonal antibodies or fragments thereof that target Clostridioides difficile Toxin A.
  • Pharmaceutically Acceptable Carrier: This component facilitates the delivery and stability of the active ingredient. Examples could include buffers, excipients, and stabilizers, depending on the intended route of administration.
  • Therapeutic Application: The composition is intended for treating infections caused by Clostridioides difficile, particularly by neutralizing the bacterial toxins responsible for the clinical manifestations of the disease. This approach targets the disease mechanism by mitigating the effects of the toxins rather than solely eradicating the bacteria.

The composition is designed for oral administration, facilitating direct delivery to the gastrointestinal tract where the Clostridioides difficile toxins exert their harmful effects.

What is the Significance of the Toxin Neutralization Approach?

The significance of the toxin neutralization approach described in U.S. Patent 6,984,720 lies in its direct targeting of the pathogenic mechanism of Clostridioides difficile infections.

  • Mechanism of Action: Instead of solely relying on antibiotics to kill the bacteria, this invention focuses on neutralizing the toxins (Toxin A and Toxin B) that the bacteria produce. These toxins are the primary drivers of the inflammation and tissue damage in the colon, leading to symptoms like diarrhea and colitis.
  • Therapeutic Advantages:
    • Reduced Antibiotic Resistance: By not directly targeting bacterial growth, this method may circumvent issues related to antibiotic resistance, which is a growing concern in treating recurrent or complicated CDI.
    • Complementary Therapy: It can be used in conjunction with antibiotics to provide a more comprehensive treatment strategy, addressing both the bacterial load and the toxic insult.
    • Potential for Reduced Recurrence: Some research suggests that neutralizing toxins may play a role in preventing the recurrence of CDI, which is a common problem with conventional antibiotic treatments.
  • Drug Target: The patent targets the toxins as the critical entities to inhibit, offering a novel therapeutic avenue distinct from traditional antibacterial agents.

This toxin-neutralization strategy was a key differentiator for products developed based on this patent, such as the drug actoxumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting C. difficile toxin A, which was investigated by Optimer Pharmaceuticals.

What is the Patent Landscape Surrounding U.S. Patent 6,984,720?

The patent landscape for U.S. Patent 6,984,720 involves a cluster of related intellectual property concerning Clostridioides difficile diagnostics and therapeutics. This includes patents covering:

  • Other Detection Methods: Patents for different diagnostic approaches, such as nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) that detect bacterial genes, enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) that detect toxins, or combinations thereof.
  • Antibacterial Agents: Numerous patents for traditional antibiotics used to treat CDI, including metronidazole, vancomycin, and fidaxomicin. These patents often claim specific antibiotic compounds, formulations, or treatment regimens.
  • Novel Antibacterial Compounds: Patents for new classes of antibiotics or bacteriophages designed to combat Clostridioides difficile.
  • Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) Related Patents: While not direct drug patents, patents may exist related to the processes or compositions used in FMT for treating recurrent CDI.
  • Other Toxin-Neutralizing Agents: As the therapeutic approach of toxin neutralization gains traction, other patents might emerge covering different antibodies, antibody fragments, or small molecules designed to bind to and neutralize C. difficile toxins.

Optimer Pharmaceuticals, the assignee of U.S. Patent 6,984,720, was later acquired by Cubist Pharmaceuticals in 2013, which was subsequently acquired by Merck & Co. in 2015. This M&A activity indicates the commercial interest and strategic importance of the CDI therapeutic space and the underlying intellectual property. The patent portfolio would have been a significant asset in these transactions.

  • Key Competitors and Collaborators: Companies actively involved in CDI research and development would have their own patent portfolios in this area. This includes companies with approved CDI treatments (e.g., Merck with DIFICID, formerly fidaxomicin acquired from Astellas Pharma) and those investigating new therapies.
  • Post-Grant Challenges: The validity and scope of U.S. Patent 6,984,720, like any issued patent, could be subject to challenges through mechanisms such as inter partes review (IPR) at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or litigation in federal courts, especially if its claims are asserted against a competitor. Such challenges would involve an examination of prior art and the patentability of the claimed inventions.

The patent landscape highlights a competitive but also collaborative environment where intellectual property rights are crucial for protecting investments in novel CDI treatments.

What is the Current Status and Market Relevance of U.S. Patent 6,984,720?

U.S. Patent 6,984,720 was granted on January 10, 2006. Patents in the United States typically have a term of 20 years from the filing date, subject to certain adjustments. Assuming a standard filing date in the early 2000s, the patent's term would likely have expired or is nearing expiration.

  • Patent Expiration: As of 2024, the patent is likely expired or close to expiring. This means that the claims of U.S. Patent 6,984,720 are no longer enforceable. Generic or biosimilar versions of products covered by its claims could potentially be developed and marketed without infringing this specific patent.
  • Market Relevance: Despite its approaching expiration, the patent held significant market relevance during its enforceable term.
    • Product Development: It provided crucial intellectual property protection for Optimer Pharmaceuticals' lead CDI drug candidate, actoxumab. Actoxumab was a human monoclonal antibody targeting C. difficile Toxin A, and its development and subsequent sale to Cubist Pharmaceuticals were directly supported by this patent and related intellectual property.
    • Acquisition and Licensing: The patent portfolio, including U.S. Patent 6,984,720, was a valuable asset that contributed to the acquisition of Optimer Pharmaceuticals by Cubist Pharmaceuticals and subsequently Merck & Co.
    • Foundation for Future Research: The scientific and therapeutic principles established by this patent, particularly the focus on toxin neutralization, continue to influence research and development in the CDI field. It paved the way for understanding the efficacy of targeting toxins as a therapeutic strategy.
  • Competitive Impact: During its enforceability, the patent prevented competitors from marketing directly competing products based on the same specific toxin-neutralizing polypeptides and methods. Companies had to develop alternative approaches or wait for patent expiry.
  • Post-Expiration Landscape: Following patent expiration, the disclosed technology enters the public domain. Competitors can utilize the disclosed methods and compositions, provided they do not infringe on other existing patents (e.g., patents covering manufacturing processes, specific formulations, or newer generations of therapies). The market for CDI treatments remains competitive, with both traditional antibiotics and newer biological agents vying for market share.

The legacy of U.S. Patent 6,984,720 is tied to its role in protecting early-stage research and development for a novel therapeutic approach to CDI and its contribution to the consolidation of key assets in this therapeutic area.

What are the Key Technical Features of the Patented Method?

The key technical features of the method patented under U.S. Patent 6,984,720 center on the detection and concurrent treatment of Clostridioides difficile infections by directly addressing the bacterial toxins.

  • Detection of Bacterial Toxins:
    • Target: The method specifically focuses on detecting the presence of toxins produced by Clostridioides difficile. The patent identifies Toxin A and Toxin B as primary targets.
    • Biological Sample: Detection occurs in biological samples obtained from a subject, most commonly fecal or stool samples.
    • Methodology: While not explicitly detailing specific detection assays, the claims imply the use of standard diagnostic techniques capable of identifying these protein toxins.
  • Therapeutic Intervention:
    • Antimicrobial Polypeptide: The core of the treatment is the administration of a specific type of antimicrobial polypeptide. This polypeptide is designed to bind to and neutralize the Clostridioides difficile toxins.
    • Mechanism of Binding: The polypeptide's function is to sequester or inhibit the activity of the toxins, preventing them from binding to host cell receptors and causing cellular damage.
    • Specificity: The claims often specify polypeptides that bind to Toxin A, suggesting a targeted approach.
    • Enhanced Affinity: The patent emphasizes that these polypeptides possess enhanced toxin-binding affinity, indicating that they are not generic antibodies but rather engineered or selected for high efficacy.
  • Simultaneous Detection and Treatment: A notable aspect is the integration of detection and treatment. The method describes detecting the infection and then administering the therapeutic agent. This implies a rapid diagnostic and therapeutic workflow, potentially for use in clinical settings where timely intervention is critical.
  • Oral Administration: The preferred method of administration for the therapeutic composition is oral. This is significant for a gastrointestinal infection, as it allows for direct delivery of the toxin-neutralizing agent to the site of infection and toxin action in the colon.
  • Compositional Aspects: The patent also covers compositions for this therapeutic use, comprising the specific polypeptide and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. This includes formulations suitable for oral delivery.

The technical innovation lies in the concept of using a specific, high-affinity polypeptide to directly combat the cytotoxic effects of C. difficile toxins, offering a mechanistic advantage over purely antibiotic-based therapies by targeting the disease pathology.

How Does U.S. Patent 6,984,720 Compare to Other CDI Treatments?

U.S. Patent 6,984,720 represents a therapeutic strategy that fundamentally differs from traditional antibiotic treatments for Clostridioides difficile infections.

  • Traditional Antibiotics (e.g., Vancomycin, Metronidazole, Fidaxomicin):
    • Mechanism: These drugs target and kill the Clostridioides difficile bacteria, reducing their population in the gut.
    • Limitations: They can disrupt the normal gut microbiota, potentially leading to recurrent infections. Some bacteria may also develop resistance. They do not directly neutralize the toxins produced by the bacteria.
    • Patent Protection: Patents for these drugs typically cover the chemical structure of the antibiotic, specific formulations, or dosing regimens.
  • Toxin Neutralization (as claimed in U.S. Patent 6,984,720):
    • Mechanism: This approach uses agents (e.g., antibodies) that bind to and neutralize the toxins (Toxin A and Toxin B) produced by the bacteria. The goal is to prevent the toxins from causing damage to the intestinal lining.
    • Advantages:
      • Does not disrupt gut microbiota: By targeting toxins rather than bacteria, this method spares the beneficial gut bacteria, potentially reducing the risk of recurrence.
      • Directly addresses pathology: It mitigates the damaging effects of the toxins, which are the direct cause of symptoms.
      • Potential for synergistic use: Can be used alongside antibiotics to provide a more comprehensive treatment.
    • Patent Protection: Patents in this area cover the specific neutralizing agents (e.g., monoclonal antibodies, antibody fragments), their binding characteristics, and their use in treating CDI.
  • Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT):
    • Mechanism: Restores a healthy gut microbiome by introducing fecal matter from a healthy donor into the patient's gastrointestinal tract.
    • Advantages: Highly effective for recurrent CDI.
    • Limitations: Not a pharmaceutical product in the traditional sense; regulatory pathways are complex.
    • Patent Protection: Patents may cover specific methods of donor screening, preparation, administration, or composition of fecal material.

U.S. Patent 6,984,720's claims are significant because they protect a therapeutic modality that addresses the disease mechanism directly, offering a distinct and potentially complementary approach to established CDI treatments. This distinction allowed for a unique market position during the patent's enforceability.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 6,984,720 claims methods for detecting and treating Clostridioides difficile infections by using a polypeptide to neutralize bacterial toxins.
  • The patented approach targets the toxins, not the bacteria directly, offering potential advantages in reducing recurrence and antimicrobial resistance.
  • The patent provided intellectual property protection for novel CDI therapeutics developed by Optimer Pharmaceuticals, influencing company acquisitions.
  • The patent is likely expired or nearing expiration, meaning its claims are no longer enforceable against competitors.
  • The toxin neutralization strategy pioneered by this patent continues to inform CDI research and development.

FAQs

  1. When was U.S. Patent 6,984,720 filed? The filing date for U.S. Patent 6,984,720 is typically not directly stated in the patent document itself but is discoverable through patent databases. The granted date is January 10, 2006.

  2. What specific toxins does the patent claim to neutralize? The patent primarily focuses on toxins produced by Clostridioides difficile, specifically mentioning Toxin A and Toxin B as targets for neutralization.

  3. What is the typical lifespan of a U.S. utility patent? A U.S. utility patent generally has a term of 20 years from the earliest effective filing date, subject to the payment of maintenance fees.

  4. Can a competitor now use the technology described in U.S. Patent 6,984,720? If the patent term has expired, the technology disclosed in the patent has entered the public domain and can generally be used by competitors, provided no other patents cover related aspects of the technology.

  5. What is the significance of a patent covering a "method" versus a "composition"? A patent covering a "method" protects the process or way of doing something, such as a specific diagnostic or treatment procedure. A patent covering a "composition" protects the physical entity, such as a drug or a chemical compound. Both are crucial for protecting therapeutic innovations.

Citations

[1] Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2006). United States Patent 6,984,720: Method for detecting and treating bacterial infections and compositions related thereto. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 6,984,720

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Bristol-myers Squibb Company YERVOY ipilimumab Injection 125377 March 25, 2011 6,984,720 2020-08-24
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.