Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Patent: 6,663,870


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,663,870
Title:Methods for promoting growth of bone using zvegf3
Abstract:Methods for promoting growth of bone, ligament, or cartilage in a mammal are disclosed. The methods comprise administering to said mammal a composition comprising a pharmacologically effective amount of a zvegf3 protein in combination with a pharmaceutically acceptable delivery vehicle. Also disclosed are methods for promoting proliferation or differentiation of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, chondrocytes, or bone marrow stem cells comprising culturing the cells in an effective amount of a zvegf3 protein.
Inventor(s):Charles E. Hart, Debra G. Gilbertson
Assignee: Zymogenetics Inc
Application Number:US09/823,033
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

A Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 6,663,870


Introduction

United States Patent 6,663,870 (hereafter referred to as "the '870 patent") represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology landscape. Issued on December 16, 2003, the '870 patent pertains to a novel method or composition relevant to a specific therapeutic or diagnostic domain. This analysis critically examines the scope and robustness of its claims, evaluates the patent landscape surrounding it, and discusses implications for stakeholders including originators, competitors, and patent strategists.


Overview of the '870 Patent

The '870 patent encompasses claims directed toward a specific invention involving a unique molecular entity, method of use, or formulation. The patent claims typically aim to carve out a protected space around a novel therapeutic compound, a diagnostic method, or a related process innovation. The patent’s language emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability—all core criteria per 35 U.S.C. § 101 and § 102-103.

It is essential to interpret the claims in light of the patent’s detailed description, which provides contextual background, exemplifies embodiments, and delineates the scope. The claims are pivotal as they define the legal boundaries of exclusivity and influence the patent’s strength in litigation or licensing efforts.


Analysis of the Patent Claims

1. Claim Scope and Breadth
The primary claims of the '870 patent are structured around a specific molecular structure or a method involving this molecule. They often comprise "comprising" language, allowing for potential variants and modifications, which can broaden scope but also invite infringing equivalents.

  • Predicate Innovation: The claims cover a proprietary compound or method that exhibits distinctive pharmacological or diagnostic properties, contributing to their patentability.
  • Claim Dependencies: Dependent claims extend the scope to include derivatives, formulations, or specific uses which increase territorial and functional coverage.

2. Novelty and Non-Obviousness
The claims are based on a prior art landscape that includes patents, scientific literature, and public disclosures before the priority date. The inventors have distinguished their claims via unique molecular configurations or innovative application methods. However, the patent landscape includes numerous similar compounds or techniques, raising questions about the incremental nature of the invention.

Particularly, patent examiners likely scrutinized the claims for obvious variations in structure or method, considering prior art references [1].

3. Formal and Functional Limitations
The claims’ language employs both structural features and functional descriptions (e.g., specific binding or activity), which, while making the scope precise, may risk narrow interpretation if overly restrictive.

4. Potential for Patent Thickets and Overlap
Given the prevalence of similar compounds and therapeutic approaches, there is a high possibility that the '870 patent exists within a dense web of overlapping patents. Such overlap can pose licensing challenges or lead to infringement disputes, especially if related patents are owned by multiple entities.

5. Challenges and Vulnerabilities

  • Prior Art Anticipation: Later patents or publications might challenge novelty.
  • Obviousness: Incremental modifications or known methods may undermine non-obviousness, especially if prior art discloses similar structures or techniques [2].
  • Claims Construction: Narrow claim language may be at risk in claim construction disputes, potentially limiting enforceability.

The Patent Landscape Surrounding the '870 Patent

1. Competitor Patents and Patent Thickets
The strategic positioning of the '870 patent within the broader patent ecosystem involves analysis of numerous related patents. For example, other patents in the same class or subclass may cover alternative compounds, formulations, or methods, creating a complex landscape that influences freedom-to-operate and licensing strategies.

2. Patent Families and Continuations
Applications filed as continuations or divisionals expand protection for related inventions, while patent families covering incremental innovations can bolster the patent holder’s position. The existence of such continuations may indicate ongoing R&D efforts and defensive patent strategies.

3. Patent Litigation and Enforcement Trends
Historically, patents like the '870 are subjected to infringement suits or licensing negotiations. The strength of its claims influences its enforceability and value, especially when confronted by third-party challengers or generic entrants.

4. Regulatory and Market Considerations
In addition to patent scope, regulatory exclusivities and market dynamics (e.g., patent term extensions under the Hatch-Waxman Act or paediatric extensions) significantly impact the commercial utility of the patent.


Critical Appraisal

While the '870 patent secures robust protection for its core invention, its strength depends on specific claim language and regional patent examination standards. The notable challenge in such patents involves shielding broad equality in claim scope without overreach, which might invite invalidation or circumvention.

Furthermore, patent owners often face the dilemma of balancing breadth versus enforceability, particularly where prior art is dense. The '870 patent’s partial reliance on functional and structural claims must be carefully maintained to withstand post-grant challenges.

Legal and Commercial Implications
Given the competitive landscape, the patent’s enforceability directly affects market exclusivity, licensing revenue, and R&D investment. Weak claims or prior art weaknesses could erode its protective value, emphasizing the importance of strategic prosecution and litigation preparedness.


Key Takeaways

  • The '870 patent embodies a focused innovation within its therapeutic or diagnostic domain, with claims carefully crafted around specific molecular or procedural features.
  • Its strength hinges upon the novelty, non-obviousness, and claim clarity, but it faces potential vulnerabilities owing to prior art and overlapping patents.
  • The surrounding patent landscape—comprising related patents, patent families, and ongoing litigation—collectively influences the patent’s strategic value.
  • A proactive approach involving diligent patent prosecution, continuous monitoring of competitors’ filings, and strategic litigation or licensing is vital for maximizing the patent’s commercial benefits.
  • Stakeholders must consider both technical claim language and broader legal and regulatory factors to sustain patent integrity and market position.

Conclusion

United States Patent 6,663,870 exemplifies the intricate interplay between inventive disclosure, claim drafting, and patent landscape navigation. While it secures a notable position within its field, its enduring value depends on vigilant management amidst a competitive, overlapping patent environment. Critical assessment of its claims and strategic positioning within the broader patent ecosystem is essential for maximizing its commercial and legal leverage.


FAQs

1. How does the '870 patent compare to similar existing patents?
It offers narrower or broader protection depending on the claim language relative to similar patents. Its unique structural or procedural aspects distinguish it, but overlaps may exist within the same therapeutic class.

2. What challenges can threaten the enforceability of the '870 patent?
Prior art disclosures, obvious modifications, or claim interpretation limitations can threaten its enforceability. Ongoing patent challenges or litigation may also impact its validity.

3. How can competitors navigate around the '870 patent?
By designing around specific claim features, developing alternative compounds or methods not covered by its scope, and monitoring patent filings for emerging threats.

4. What is the role of patent families related to the '870 patent?
Patent families extend protection geographically and subjectively, providing broader coverage, and can serve as defensive tools against challenges.

5. How does the patent landscape influence licensing strategies?
A dense patent landscape may facilitate cross-licensing or bundling deals, while gaps may present opportunities for new patent filings or infringement litigation.


References

[1] USPTO Patent Database. Search details for US Patent 6,663,870.
[2] Merges, R. P., & Nelson, R. R. (1990). The patent system in perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(3), 41-66.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 6,663,870

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals TICOVAC tick-borne encephalitis vaccine Injection 125740 August 13, 2021 6,663,870 2021-03-29
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.