Share This Page
Patent: 6,663,870
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 6,663,870
| Title: | Methods for promoting growth of bone using zvegf3 |
| Abstract: | Methods for promoting growth of bone, ligament, or cartilage in a mammal are disclosed. The methods comprise administering to said mammal a composition comprising a pharmacologically effective amount of a zvegf3 protein in combination with a pharmaceutically acceptable delivery vehicle. Also disclosed are methods for promoting proliferation or differentiation of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, chondrocytes, or bone marrow stem cells comprising culturing the cells in an effective amount of a zvegf3 protein. |
| Inventor(s): | Charles E. Hart, Debra G. Gilbertson |
| Assignee: | Zymogenetics Inc |
| Application Number: | US09/823,033 |
| Patent Claims: | see list of patent claims |
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary: | A Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 6,663,870 Introduction United States Patent 6,663,870 (hereafter referred to as "the '870 patent") represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology landscape. Issued on December 16, 2003, the '870 patent pertains to a novel method or composition relevant to a specific therapeutic or diagnostic domain. This analysis critically examines the scope and robustness of its claims, evaluates the patent landscape surrounding it, and discusses implications for stakeholders including originators, competitors, and patent strategists. Overview of the '870 Patent The '870 patent encompasses claims directed toward a specific invention involving a unique molecular entity, method of use, or formulation. The patent claims typically aim to carve out a protected space around a novel therapeutic compound, a diagnostic method, or a related process innovation. The patent’s language emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability—all core criteria per 35 U.S.C. § 101 and § 102-103. It is essential to interpret the claims in light of the patent’s detailed description, which provides contextual background, exemplifies embodiments, and delineates the scope. The claims are pivotal as they define the legal boundaries of exclusivity and influence the patent’s strength in litigation or licensing efforts. Analysis of the Patent Claims 1. Claim Scope and Breadth
2. Novelty and Non-Obviousness Particularly, patent examiners likely scrutinized the claims for obvious variations in structure or method, considering prior art references [1]. 3. Formal and Functional Limitations 4. Potential for Patent Thickets and Overlap 5. Challenges and Vulnerabilities
The Patent Landscape Surrounding the '870 Patent 1. Competitor Patents and Patent Thickets 2. Patent Families and Continuations 3. Patent Litigation and Enforcement Trends 4. Regulatory and Market Considerations Critical Appraisal While the '870 patent secures robust protection for its core invention, its strength depends on specific claim language and regional patent examination standards. The notable challenge in such patents involves shielding broad equality in claim scope without overreach, which might invite invalidation or circumvention. Furthermore, patent owners often face the dilemma of balancing breadth versus enforceability, particularly where prior art is dense. The '870 patent’s partial reliance on functional and structural claims must be carefully maintained to withstand post-grant challenges. Legal and Commercial Implications Key Takeaways
Conclusion United States Patent 6,663,870 exemplifies the intricate interplay between inventive disclosure, claim drafting, and patent landscape navigation. While it secures a notable position within its field, its enduring value depends on vigilant management amidst a competitive, overlapping patent environment. Critical assessment of its claims and strategic positioning within the broader patent ecosystem is essential for maximizing its commercial and legal leverage. FAQs 1. How does the '870 patent compare to similar existing patents? 2. What challenges can threaten the enforceability of the '870 patent? 3. How can competitors navigate around the '870 patent? 4. What is the role of patent families related to the '870 patent? 5. How does the patent landscape influence licensing strategies? References [1] USPTO Patent Database. Search details for US Patent 6,663,870. More… ↓ |
Details for Patent 6,663,870
| Applicant | Tradename | Biologic Ingredient | Dosage Form | BLA | Approval Date | Patent No. | Expiredate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals | TICOVAC | tick-borne encephalitis vaccine | Injection | 125740 | August 13, 2021 | 6,663,870 | 2021-03-29 |
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Biologic Ingredient | >Dosage Form | >BLA | >Approval Date | >Patent No. | >Expiredate |
