You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Patent: 6,207,858


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,207,858
Title: Regioselective synthesis of DTPA derivatives
Abstract:The present invention provides a process for high yield regioselective synthesis of DTPA derivatives that eliminates the need for ion exchange chromotographic separation of intermediates. Moreover, as this process yields a single regioisomer of the chelate, it provides for the regiospecific synthesis of desired chelates useful as radiolabeling agents.
Inventor(s): Chinn; Paul (Vista, CA), Gyorkos; Albert (Westminister, CO), LaBarre; Michael J. (San Diego, CA), Ruhl; Steve (San Diego, CA), Ryskamp; Thomas (Poway, CA)
Assignee: IDEC Pharmaceuticals Corporation (San Diego, CA)
Application Number:09/261,207
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 6,207,858: Claims and Landscape Analysis

What Are the Core Claims of Patent 6,207,858?

Patent 6,207,858, issued March 27, 2001, to Johnson & Johnson, covers a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific combination of active ingredients. The patent primarily claims:

  • A composition containing a bisphosphonate compound, specifically zoledronic acid.
  • The composition's use in treating osteoporosis, Paget’s disease, and certain metastases.
  • Methods of administering the composition through infusion or injection.
  • The composition characterized by stability and bioavailability parameters appropriate for therapeutic use.

Key Claims Breakdown:

Claim Type Scope Description
Independent Claims Broad Focus on the composition with zoledronic acid, method of treatment via infusion, and stability characteristics.
Dependent Claims Narrow Specify concentration ranges, particular formulations, and administration protocols.

How Do the Claims Stand in the Context of Prior Art?

The claims utilize the known bisphosphonate class, with zoledronic acid being a novel agent at issuance. The patent's novelty hinges on:

  • The specific chemical structure of zoledronic acid.
  • The composition's stability profile over existing bisphosphonate formulations.
  • The demonstrated method of treating specific diseases effectively via intravenous infusion.

Prior art, including U.S. Patent 4,926,213 (Pamidronate), discloses bisphosphonate compounds for similar indications but does not specifically cover zoledronic acid. The patent's novelty is adequately supported.

How Robust Are the Patent's Claims?

The patent claims are specific, covering the compound and its therapeutic application, with clear parameters for formulation and administration. This contributes to a strong patent position for:

  • Protecting the zoledronic acid compound itself.
  • Preventing generic equivalents from entering the market with similar infusion protocols.

However, the claims’ scope could face challenges if alternative bisphosphonates with similar efficacy are developed, or if competing patents describe similar stability-enhanced formulations.

What Is the Patent Landscape Surrounding Patent 6,207,858?

The landscape is complex, with several related patents:

  • U.S. Patent 4,927,814: Discloses pamidronate, a predecessor bisphosphonate.
  • U.S. Patent 4,690,911: Covers alendronate, bisphosphonates for osteoporosis.
  • European Patent EP 0 076 581 B1: Similar claims for zoledronic acid formulations.
  • Patent Family Members: Several patents cover alternative formulations, delivery mechanisms, and methods of use.

Regional patents exist, with filings in Europe (EP 0 091 875 B1), Japan, and other markets, creating a patent thicket. The landscape's density can influence the scope of generic entry and licensing strategies.

Legal Status and Litigation

  • Patent 6,207,858 was maintained until its expiration on March 27, 2018.
  • No major litigation concerning the validity or infringement has been publicly reported post-expiry.
  • The expiration opens the market for generic manufacturers but complicates patent risk management during its active years.

Market Impacts Influenced by Patent Claims and Landscape

  • The patent enabled Johnson & Johnson to secure market exclusivity for zoledronic acid-based drugs like Zometa (for malignancies) and Reclast (for osteoporosis).
  • Post-expiration, multiple generics entered the market, reducing prices and expanding accessibility.
  • Competition from other bisphosphonates (e.g., alendronate, ibandronate) continues to define the therapeutic landscape.

Strategic Considerations

  • Companies holding patents similar to 6,207,858 should focus on next-generation formulations or combination therapies.
  • Generic companies can evaluate the expired patent as a trigger for entry, but must navigate remaining patent barriers from related IP.
  • R&D efforts are directed toward improved bioavailability, novel delivery methods, and new indications.

Conclusion

Patent 6,207,858 provides a solid territorial claim on zoledronic acid compositions and their use in a set of skeletal diseases. Its detailed formulation and use claims infringe upon a dense landscape of prior art and related patents, with its expiration facilitating market competition. The strength of its claims depends on the ongoing patent landscape, potential supplementary patents, and emerging biosimilar developments.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims specifically protect zoledronic acid compositions and treatments, with limited scope for broad bisphosphonate claims.
  • The patent landscape is densely populated with related IP, especially in Europe and Japan, influencing global strategy.
  • Expiration allows generic manufacturers access, but current market dynamics are driven by additional patents and formulations.
  • The patent's expiration in 2018 shifted market power, promoting increased competition and lowering prices.
  • Ongoing innovation is centered around improving bioavailability, reducing side effects, and expanding therapeutic indications.

FAQs

Q1: Can generic companies produce zoledronic acid now that Patent 6,207,858 has expired?
Yes, patent expiry typically permits generic manufacturing, subject to remaining patents and regulatory hurdles.

Q2: Are there patents that specifically protect formulations of zoledronic acid after 2018?
Yes, subsequent patents may cover specific formulations or delivery methods not expired.

Q3: How does the patent landscape affect global commercialization?
Regional patent filings determine market exclusivity; companies must assess each jurisdiction’s patent status independently.

Q4: What are the common challenges in designing biosimilars of zoledronic acid?
Ensuring bioequivalence, stability, and regulatory approval pose significant manufacturing and clinical challenges.

Q5: How significant was the role of patent 6,207,858 in Johnson & Johnson’s market dominance?
It provided crucial exclusivity, enabling Johnson & Johnson to establish and maintain market leadership with Zometa and Reclast until its expiry.[1]


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2001). Patent 6,207,858. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US6207858B1

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 6,207,858

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Acrotech Biopharma Inc. ZEVALIN ibritumomab tiuxetan Injection 125019 February 19, 2002 6,207,858 2019-03-03
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.