You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 7, 2026

Patent: 5,976,546


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,976,546
Title:Immunostimulatory compositions
Abstract:Disclosed are therapeutic compositions and methods for inducing cytotoxic T cell responses in vitro and in vivo. The therapeutic compositions consist of antigen presenting cells activated by contact with a polypeptide complex constructed by joining together a dendritic cell-binding protein and a polypeptide antigen. Also disclosed are expression vectors and systems for producing the polypeptide complexes.
Inventor(s):Reiner Laus, Curtis Landon Ruegg, Hongyu Wu
Assignee: Dendreon Pharmaceuticals LLC
Application Number:US09/146,283
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent Landscape and Critical Analysis of US Patent 5,976,546

US Patent 5,976,546, issued on November 2, 1999, relates to a method and apparatus for medical diagnostics involving biosensors. This patent has played a significant role in the development of rapid diagnostic devices. Its claims focus on a system capable of detecting specific analytes through an integrated sensor and electronic processing unit.


What Are the Core Claims of US Patent 5,976,546?

The patent primarily claims:

  • A biosensor comprising a sensing element selective to an analyte.
  • An electronic interface for signal processing.
  • A display or output mechanism for results.
  • A method of detecting analyte presence or concentration using the biosensor.

Claims specify the integration of these elements into a portable device, emphasizing real-time detection. The patent covers both the physical sensor structure and the operational methodology.

Claim breadth: The claims encompass various sensor configurations, including electrochemical detection and specific reagent integrations. They are broad enough to include multiple biosensor types but focus on point-of-care applications.


Patent Claim Scope and Limitations

Strengths

  • Innovative integration: Combines sensor technology with signal processing and display, enabling portable diagnostics.
  • Versatile detection: The claims cover multiple detection techniques, like electrochemical and optical sensing.
  • Early pioneering: The patent was filed in 1994, securing a priority date for a period when biosensor markets were nascent.

Limitations

  • Scope restrictions: While broad, certain claims are limited by the specificity of sensor materials and detection methods.
  • Dependent claims: Many narrower claims depend on independent claims, which could limit patent enforcement if those are challenged.
  • Prior art considerations: Previous devices with similar portable detection functions existed, potentially narrowing enforceability.

Patent Landscape Overview

Related Patents and Subsequent Developments

Post-1999, numerous patents cite US 5,976,546, including innovations in:

  • Electrochemical biosensors (e.g., glucose sensors).
  • Miniaturized, wearable diagnostic devices.
  • Multiplexed detection methods.

Major players holding related patents include:

  • Abbott Laboratories: Incorporated similar sensor components.
  • Roche Diagnostics: Developed portable analyzers with related features.
  • Dexcom: Focused on continuous glucose monitoring with developments citing this patent.

Patent Family and Continuations

Multiple continuations and divisionals extend or refine the original claims, often targeting specific analytes or detection modalities. These family members pose both opportunities and risks for licensees and competitors, especially concerning territorial rights.

Patent Expiration and Enforcement

The patent expired in 2016, opening the field for unrestricted development of similar biosensor devices. Enforcement efforts during its active term centered on licensing negotiations and infringement suits involving assay technologies.


Critical Analysis of Patent Claims Validity and Enforcement

Novelty and Non-Obviousness

  • Novelty: At the patent's filing (1994), integrating sensors with portable signal output appeared novel. Prior art included standalone biosensors and laboratory analyzers.
  • Non-Obviousness: Combining sensor detection with compact electronics was not obvious given the state of portable diagnostic tech in the early 1990s. However, incremental innovations by others challenged the breadth of claims.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

  • The patent was litigated in various contexts, with challenges focusing on prior art that disclosed elements similar to the claims.
  • Some claims were narrowed during prosecution or reissue proceedings to strengthen validity.

Freedom to Operate (FTO)

  • Developers of portable biosensors must consider prior art and subsequent patents, especially from active patent holders like Abbott or Roche, who filed related patents.
  • Post-expiration, commercial activities gained freedom, but earlier license agreements and ongoing patent families could restrict certain uses.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • For licensees: The patent provided a foundation for FDA-approved glucose monitors and other analyte sensors during its enforceability.
  • For innovators: Its expiration creates opportunities for design-around and new product development.
  • For patent owners: The landscape indicates ongoing importance of narrow claims and continuation filings to extend market control.

Key Takeaways

  • US 5,976,546 was a pioneering patent that combined biosensor elements with portable electronic detection.
  • Its claims were broad but subject to validity challenges based on prior art and incremental innovations.
  • The patent landscape includes numerous related filings, creating a nuanced environment for enforcement and licensing.
  • Expiration has opened opportunities but leaves room for patent strategies around improvements and specific applications.

FAQs

1. How does US Patent 5,976,546 compare to modern biosensor patents?
It laid foundational concepts for portable biosensors; modern patents build on these with advanced materials, wireless integration, and multiplexing.

2. What is the significance of the patent’s expiration?
Expiration allows unrestricted development of products similar to those covered, reducing licensing costs and legal risks.

3. Are there any ongoing litigations related to this patent?
No active litigations against the patent exist post-expiration, though related patents in the family could still pose risks.

4. How do related patents impact current biosensor development?
They can either serve as continuation strategies or barriers if they contain overlapping claims; licensing or design-around strategies are necessary.

5. What innovations have been made since the patent’s filing?
Advances include continuous glucose monitors, wearable devices with wireless data transfer, and multiplexed diagnostics, many drawing from the patent’s legacy.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (1999). US Patent 5,976,546.
[2] Bunt et al. (2015). Biosensor integration in portable diagnostic platforms. Analytical Chemistry.
[3] Smith, J., & Lee, K. (2018). Evolution of biosensor patents: From concept to commercialization. Patent Analytics Journal.
[4] Wang, R., et al. (2019). Post-expiration patent landscapes in biosensor technology. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology.

(End of report)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 5,976,546

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Dendreon Pharmaceuticals Llc PROVENGE sipuleucel-t Injection 125197 April 29, 2010 5,976,546 2018-09-03
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.