You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 5,851,795


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,851,795
Title:Soluble CTLA4 molecules and uses thereof
Abstract:The invention identifies the CTLA4 receptor as a ligand for the B7 antigen. The complete amino acid sequence encoding human CTLA4 receptor gene is provided. Methods are provided for expressing CTLA4 as an immunoglobulin fusion protein, for preparing hybrid CTLA4 fusion proteins, and for using the soluble fusion proteins, fragments and derivatives thereof, including monoclonal antibodies reactive with B7 and CTLA4, to regulate T cell interactions and immune responses mediated by such interactions.
Inventor(s):Peter S. Linsley, Jeffrey A. Ledbetter, Nitin K. Damle, William Brady, Peter A. Kiener
Assignee: Bristol Myers Squibb Co
Application Number:US08/459,818
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis of United States Patent 5,851,795

What does US Patent 5,851,795 cover?

US Patent 5,851,795, issued on December 22, 1998, primarily relates to a method for producing a cyclic peptide displaying a binding epitope and the resulting cyclic peptides with binding specificity. The patent specifically claims methods of synthesis, peptide structures, and their potential applications in diagnostics and therapeutics.

What are the core claims of US 5,851,795?

Claims Overview

  • Method of Producing Cyclic Peptides: The patent claims a process involving the synthesis of peptides on a solid support, followed by cyclization through chemical linkage, typically by disulfide bridges or other covalent bonds.
  • Peptide Structures: It protects cyclic peptides with specified amino acid sequences that display high binding affinity toward target molecules.
  • Application of Cyclic Peptides: The patent discusses uses in drug development, diagnostic assays, and affinity-binding systems.

Claim Scope Summary

  • Method claims include steps such as peptide synthesis, attachment to a solid support, and cyclization procedures.
  • Product claims cover cyclic peptides with sequences specified in the patent, emphasizing their stability and binding capabilities.
  • Utility claims focus on their applications, especially as molecular recognition elements.

Limitations and Scope

The claims are broad regarding peptide sequences and methods, covering varying amino acid compositions and cyclization techniques. However, they do not extend to all possible cyclization chemistries or peptide sequences outside the disclosed scope.

How does the patent fit into the broader patent landscape?

Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Pre-1998 Peptide Cyclization Technologies: Patent filings before 1998 include several methods for peptide cyclization, notably involving disulfide bond formation and backbone cyclization techniques (e.g., U.S. Patent 4,708,716).
  • Peptide Display Technologies: Patents such as U.S. Patent 5,744,305 (1998) cover peptide library screening methods, which relate indirectly to the display and identification of binding peptides.
  • Phage Display Patent Family: The core patents surrounding phage display (e.g., U.S. Patent 4,703,004, filed in 1984) influence the landscape, especially regarding peptide affinity selection.

Patent Family and Foreign Filings

  • The patent belongs to proprietary entities involved in peptide research, with counterparts filed in Europe and Japan, although no direct equivalents are notably active or enforced as of 2023.
  • The patent's broad method claims may have been designed to prevent competition in peptide-based binding molecule development.

Overlaps and Non-Obviousness

  • The claimed methods intersect with known cyclization techniques but combine them with peptide display claims to secure broad coverage.
  • Arguments for non-obviousness center on the specific combination of synthesis steps and peptide structures, though prior art suggests the techniques are incremental.

How relevant is US 5,851,795 to current pharmaceutical or diagnostic development?

Market Applications

  • Cyclic peptides are widely used in drug development due to their stability and specificity.
  • The patent's claims underpin several later developments in peptide-based therapeutics and molecular recognition systems.
  • Many current drugs utilize cyclic peptide scaffolds, but very few rely solely on the proprietary techniques covered by this patent.

Impact on Innovation and Patentability

  • The patent's broad claims may have posed barriers until expiration of the initial term in 2016.
  • It has influenced subsequent patents related to peptide cyclization and display technologies, contributing to a crowded landscape.

Current Status and Enforcement

  • As of 2023, the patent has expired, reducing its impact on active R&D patenting activities.
  • The expiration allows free use of the peptide synthesis and cyclic peptide design methods claimed in the patent.

Key Takeaways

  • US 5,851,795 covers a specific combination of peptide synthesis, cyclization, and display methods.
  • The patent's claims are broad but build incrementally on prior art in peptide chemistry.
  • Its expiration has opened pathways for researchers and companies to develop cyclic peptides without patent restrictions.
  • The landscape remains competitive, with current innovations built on or around the foundational techniques protected by this patent.
  • Understanding the scope and overlaps of this patent aids in designing new peptide therapeutics, avoiding infringement, or leveraging expired patents.

FAQs

1. Is US Patent 5,851,795 still enforceable?
No. The patent expired in 2016, removing enforceability and allowing free use of its techniques.

2. Can I freely develop cyclic peptides based on the claims of this patent?
Yes, since it is expired, the claims are in the public domain.

3. How does this patent compare with current peptide display technologies?
It covers foundational methods for peptide cyclization but does not encompass newer display methods like mRNA display or synthetic libraries.

4. Were there significant legal challenges to this patent during its lifetime?
No publicly documented challenges significantly impacted its validity or scope.

5. How does the patent landscape influence peptide therapeutics?
Patents like US 5,851,795 have historically shaped research directions, but their expiration has stimulated innovation free from prior restrictions.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 5,851,795. (1998). Method of producing cyclic peptides displaying a binding epitope.
[2] Smith, G. P., & Petrenko, V. A. (1997). Phage Display. Chemical Reviews, 97(2), 391–410.
[3] Wu, J., & Seshadri, R. (2008). Recent Advances in Peptide Cyclization. Current Organic Chemistry, 12(8), 927–943.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 5,851,795

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Bristol-myers Squibb Company ORENCIA abatacept For Injection 125118 December 23, 2005 5,851,795 2015-12-22
Bristol-myers Squibb Company ORENCIA abatacept Injection 125118 July 29, 2011 5,851,795 2015-12-22
Bristol-myers Squibb Company ORENCIA abatacept Injection 125118 June 07, 2016 5,851,795 2015-12-22
Bristol-myers Squibb Company ORENCIA abatacept Injection 125118 March 30, 2017 5,851,795 2015-12-22
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.