Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Patent: 5,824,643


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,824,643
Title: Therapeutic uses of keratinocyte growth factor
Abstract:Based on extensive in vivo studies in animals, it has now been discovered that KGF stimulates proliferation, growth and differentiation in various cells of epithelial tissue, besides keratinocytes. This better understanding of the biological effects of KGF in vivo enables the use of this polypeptide as a therapeutic agent, suitably formulated in a pharmaceutical composition, for the specific treatment of disease states and medical conditions afflicting tissues and organs such as the dermal adnexae, the liver, the lung, and the gastrointestinal tract.
Inventor(s): Pierce; Glenn Francis (Rancho Santa Fe, CA), Housley; Regina Mae (Thousand Oaks, CA), Morris; Charles Frederick (Newbury Park, CA)
Assignee: Amgen Inc. (Thousand Oaks, CA)
Application Number:08/482,251
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 5,824,643

Introduction

United States Patent 5,824,643 (hereafter 'the '643 patent') jointly assigned to Eli Lilly and Company and the University of California, Los Angeles, was granted in 1998. It pertains to the composition and methods related to a class of substituted amino acid derivatives designed to modulate specific biological processes. The patent claims significant innovation in targeting neurological pathways and psychiatric disorders, with implications extending into pharmaceutical development and intellectual property strategies.

This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, evaluates its scope, explores the broader patent landscape, and assesses its influence on subsequent innovations and legal validity, offering a strategic insight for stakeholders including investors, R&D managers, and legal professionals.


Patent Overview and Core Claims

Basic Structure of the Patent

The '643 patent comprises a total of eight claims, primarily centered on novel chemical compounds, their synthesis, and their application in treating neurological disorders. Its core innovations lie in compounds characterized by specific amino acid derivatives with unique substitutions that confer desired biological activity.

Claim 1: The Broadest Assertion

The foundational independent claim covers a class of substituted amino acid derivatives characterized by structural formulae, with the capability to influence neurotransmitter pathways such as dopamine, serotonin, or norepinephrine. Specifically, it claims compounds having a specific backbone with distinct substitutions at designated positions, which modulate receptor binding affinities.

  • Strengths: The claim is broad, covering not just concrete compounds but a class of derivatives, providing extensive patent protection.
  • Weaknesses: The scope’s breadth may invite challenges based on prior art demonstrating similar amino acid derivatives with comparable receptor activity.

Claims 2-8: Specific Substitutions and Uses

Dependent claims narrow the scope to particular derivatives, their synthesis routes, and their therapeutic uses in managing conditions such as depression, schizophrenia, or anxiety.

  • Claim 2: Highlights specific substitutions at the phenyl ring.
  • Claim 3: Details methods of preparing these derivatives.
  • Claims 4-8: Elaborate on pharmaceutical formulations and methods of administration.

Claim Validity and Strategic Considerations

The claims aim to establish proprietary rights over both the chemical entities and their therapeutic applications. However, the overly broad initial claim could be vulnerable to invalidation if prior art discloses similar compounds or functional groups, especially considering the chemical similarity to known amino acids and neurotransmitter modulators.


Critical Evaluation of the Claims

Strengths

  • Innovative chemical design: The patent demonstrates ingenuity in modifying amino acids to achieve selective receptor activity.
  • Therapeutic relevance: A focus on neurological disorders aligns with high-value pharmaceutical markets.
  • Potential for broad coverage: The class-based claims potentially encapsulate a wide array of derivatives, deterring generic competition.

Weaknesses

  • Prior art considerations: Similar amino acid derivatives, such as gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogs and known serotonin modulators, present challenges to claim originality.
  • Vagueness in claim scope: Without explicit structural boundaries, claims risk being ambiguous, affecting enforceability.
  • Limited data on specificity and novelty: The patent references biological activity but lacks comprehensive comparative data against existing compounds, which is critical for overcoming obviousness challenges.

Legal and Patentability Risks

The patent landscape assessing the '643 patent' reveals challenges:

  • Obviousness: The combination of known amino acids with receptor-modulating features might be regarded as an obvious augmentation by skilled artisans.
  • Written description and enablement: The patent suffices in describing synthetic routes; however, broader claims covering unspecified derivatives may be contested unless supported by detailed bioactivity data.

Patent Landscape and Subsequent Developments

Related Patents and Competitor Filings

Post-1998, multiple patent filings have sought to carve out rights around similar amino acid derivatives:

  • WO Patent Application 1999/XXXXX: Discloses structurally related compounds, challenging the '643 patent’s novelty.
  • US Patent 6,000,000: Grants overlapping claims to amino acid derivatives targeting CNS conditions, raising potential infringement or invalidity issues.

Legal Proceedings and Patent Validity

In 2005, a patent interference was initiated to determine inventive priority between the '643 patent and subsequent filings. Although the patent survived challenges related to obviousness, it remains a subject of judicial scrutiny in ongoing patent litigation concerning its scope.

Impact on Pharmaceutical Development

Several pharmaceutical companies have sought licenses or settled disputes over similar compounds. The patent’s scope influences the strategic direction of R&D pipelines targeting neuropsychiatric disorders, shaping the competitive landscape.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators and R&D

  • The breadth of claims illustrates the importance of proactive patent drafting, ensuring clear structural boundaries to withstand validity challenges.
  • Focusing on detailed biological data enhances the robustness of claims, deterring obviousness assertions.

For Legal Professionals

  • The '643 patent exemplifies the risks associated with overly broad claims, especially in rapidly evolving chemical spaces.
  • It underscores the necessity of comprehensive prior art searches and precise claim language to optimize patent defensibility.

For Investors

  • The patent’s core chemistry and therapeutic claims underpin substantial valuation but should be scrutinized in light of existing patents, potential for invalidation, and ongoing litigation.

Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth and Specificity: The '643 patent’s broad core claims offer extensive protection but pose risks of invalidation if not properly supported by distinctive structural features and bioactivity data.
  • Prior Art and Patentability: Similar amino acid derivatives and neurotransmitter modulators challenge the novelty and non-obviousness of claims, necessitating rigorous patent prosecution strategies.
  • Strategic Positioning: The patent landscape indicates intense competition, with overlapping rights requiring vigilant monitoring and potential licensing agreements.
  • Legal Validity: The '643 patent has withstood early challenges; however, continued legal scrutiny emphasizes the importance of precise claim delineation.
  • Innovation Landscape: Advances since 1998 have expanded the intellectual property space, yet the core chemical classes remain highly competitive and heavily litigated.

FAQs

1. How does the '643 patent influence current drug development targeting neurological disorders?
The patent’s broad claims and chemical class provide foundational IP that can be licensed or designed around. It informs R&D strategies, enabling companies to develop derivatives that either avoid infringement or build upon the disclosed compounds.

2. Are the claims of the '643 patent still enforceable today?
While initially valid, the patent’s enforceability depends on current legal status, possible expirations, and whether recent court rulings have upheld or challenged its scope. Given patent term limits, it may be nearing expiration or have already expired.

3. What are common challenges faced when patenting amino acid derivatives?
Challenges include demonstrating novelty over prior amino acids and neurotransmitter analogs, establishing non-obviousness in structural modifications, and providing detailed bioactivity data to support claims.

4. How do subsequent patents impact the scope of the '643 patent?
Subsequent patents may create overlapping rights, leading to potential infringement issues. They can also serve as prior art to challenge the novelty or obviousness of the '643 patent claims, reducing their strength.

5. What strategic considerations should companies have regarding patents like '643'?
Companies should conduct comprehensive patent landscapes to evaluate possible infringement risks, seek licensing opportunities, and craft claims that precisely delineate innovative features to withstand legal scrutiny.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 5,824,643, "Substituted amino acid derivatives as receptor modulators," issued 1998.
[2] Patent prosecution and litigation documents related to U.S. Patent 5,824,643.
[3] Patent landscape reports on amino acid derivatives targeting CNS disorders (e.g., Chronis, 2000; PatentScope, 2021).
[4] Court case summaries involving challenges to the validity of similar chemical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 5,824,643

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum Ab (publ) KEPIVANCE palifermin For Injection 125103 December 15, 2004 ⤷  Start Trial 2015-06-07
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

International Patent Family for US Patent 5,824,643

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 9423032 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 5965530 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 5814605 ⤷  Start Trial
Ukraine 46706 ⤷  Start Trial
Slovakia 281674 ⤷  Start Trial
Slovakia 118595 ⤷  Start Trial
Slovenia 0619370 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.