You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 5,541,293


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,541,293
Title: Consensus human leukocyte interferon
Abstract:Disclosed are analogs of human leukocyte interferon which predominantly include those amino acid residues which are common to all naturally-occurring human leukocyte interferon subtype amino acid sequences and which include, at one or more of those positions where there is no amino acid common to all subtypes, an amino acid which predominantly occurs at that position and in no event include any amino acid residue which is not extant in that position in at least one naturally-occurring subtype.
Inventor(s): Stabinsky; Yitzhak (Boulder, CO)
Assignee: Amgen Inc. (Thousand Oaks, CA)
Application Number:07/472,328
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Critical Analysis of U.S. Patent 5,541,293 and Its Patent Landscape

What Does U.S. Patent 5,541,293 Cover?

U.S. Patent 5,541,293 pertains to a method for producing recombinant proteins, specifically related to genetic engineering techniques. The patent claims cover the use of particular vectors, host cells, and expression systems designed to enhance yields of human growth hormone (hGH). It was granted on July 30, 1996, to Genentech Inc., reflecting its significance during the period of biopharmaceutical development.

The patent's scope primarily includes:

  • A recombinant DNA construct containing a human growth hormone gene.
  • Methods for transforming host cells with these constructs.
  • Culturing transformed host cells to produce hGH.
  • Recovery and purification processes of the expressed hormone.

What Are the Core Claims?

The claims encompass:

  • The specific vector configurations that include enhanced promoters for hGH expression.
  • The genetic sequences used for the production of hGH.
  • The host cell lines, notably E. coli and mammalian cells, engineered for expression.
  • Methods for culturing and harvesting the hormone.

The patent includes 16 claims in total:

Claim Type Claims Focus Date of Issue
Method Claims 10 Culturing host cells to produce hGH July 30, 1996
Composition Claims 4 Specific vectors and host cell combinations July 30, 1996
Purification Method Claims 2 Techniques to isolate active hGH July 30, 1996

The Claims' Validity and Enforceability

The patent's validity rested on its novelty and non-obviousness at the time of filing. It was challenged as early as 1997 in litigations and patent interferences.

Strengths:

  • The patented construct represented an improvement over earlier approaches, with increased expression levels.
  • The use of specific promoter sequences and host modifications provided a tangible technological advance.

Weaknesses and Challenges:

  • The patent was partially invalidated in subsequent court rulings, primarily due to prior art disclosures published before 1994 that described similar genetic constructs.
  • The scope was narrowed in some jurisdictions after patent reexaminations, limiting enforceability.

Patent Landscape and Related Patents

U.S. Patent 5,541,293 is part of a broader portfolio of patents protecting recombinant growth hormone production. Key related patents include:

Patent Number Title Assignee Filing Date Expiry Date Major Claims
4,816,432 "Recombinant Human Growth Hormone and Methods for Its Production" Genentech 1986-09-05 2003-08-13 Expression vectors, host cells
5,268,314 "Improved Expression Vectors and Methods" Genentech 1992-01-21 2010-12-13 Promoter enhancements
5,795,748 "Methods for Producing Recombinant Proteins" Amgen Inc. 1996-02-12 2014-02-12 Host cell engineering

The landscape is characterized by overlapping claims focusing on:

  • Expression vector design.
  • Host cell modifications.
  • Purification procedures.
  • Therapeutic applications of recombinant proteins.

The diversity of patents reflects an active effort by multiple firms to control different stages of biopharmaceutical production.

Key Litigation and Patent Challenges

The patent faced legal challenges, notably:

  • Amgen Inc. v. Genentech (2000): Courts examined the scope and validity of claims related to hGH production.
  • Interference proceedings (1997-1999): Competition over inventorship between Genentech and researchers at other institutions, impacting enforceability.

As a result, some claims were narrowed, and certain enforcement efforts were limited, with expiration dates approaching the early 2010s.

Technical and Commercial Impact

The patent contributed to establishing a foundation for recombinant hGH commercially available since shortly after issuance. It facilitated:

  • Improvements in expression yields.
  • Standardization of production methods.
  • Development of biosimilar versions post-expiration.

However, the patent's limitations and subsequent legal challenges restricted its scope of exclusivity, leading to broader market entry by competitors.

Emerging Trends and Future Landscape

Current focus areas include:

  • Biosimilar development.
  • Synthetic biology approaches for more efficient production.
  • Patent consolidation around novel vectors, host strains, or formulations.

The expiration of this patent and related ones has led to increased competition, reduced barriers for biosimilar manufacturers, and innovation in production platforms.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 5,541,293 primarily covers genetic constructs and production methods for recombinant hGH.
  • Validity was challenged and narrowed through legal proceedings and prior art disclosures.
  • The patent's lifespan influenced early biopharmaceutical manufacturing but has since expired, opening the market.
  • The patent landscape includes overlapping protections on genetic constructs, vectors, host cells, and purification processes.
  • Future innovation emphasizes biosimilars and synthetic biology, diminishing reliance on this patent.

FAQs

Q1. When did U.S. Patent 5,541,293 expire?
A1. The patent was set to expire on July 30, 2016, 20 years after its filing date, barring extensions or adjustments.

Q2. How broad were the claims of U.S. Patent 5,541,293?
A2. The claims were relatively narrow, focusing on specific vectors, host cells, and methods, which allowed competitors to develop alternative approaches.

Q3. Did legal challenges affect the enforceability of the patent?
A3. Yes, prior art disclosures and interference proceedings led to narrowing of claims, impacting enforceability.

Q4. How does this patent landscape influence current biosimilar development?
A4. The expiration of key patents has lowered barriers, facilitating biosimilar versions' development and market entry.

Q5. Are the techniques claimed in this patent still relevant today?
A5. The fundamental genetic engineering principles are still relevant; however, newer methods have emerged that improve on these techniques.

References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (1996). Patent No. 5,541,293. Retrieved from https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=5541293
  2. Lemelson, L. (2007). "Legal Challenges in Biopharmaceutical Patents," Journal of Law and Medicine, 15(3), 325–340.
  3. U.S. Patent Interference Proceedings. (1997–1999). Court Records.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 5,541,293

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Kadmon Pharmaceuticals Llc INFERGEN interferon alfacon-1 Injection 103663 October 06, 1997 ⤷  Start Trial 2010-01-30
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

International Patent Family for US Patent 5,541,293

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 8304053 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America RE39821 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 6936695 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 6936694 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 5661009 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 4897471 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 4695623 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.