You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Patent: 5,476,777


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,476,777
Title:Methods for producing thrombin
Abstract:Methods are disclosed for producing thrombin. The protein is produced from host cells transformed or transfected with DNA construct(s) containing information necessary to direct the expression of thrombin precursors. The DNA constructs generally include the following operably linked elements: a transcriptional promoter, DNA sequence encoding a gla-domainless prothrombin, and a transcriptional terminator. Thrombin precursors produced from transformed or transfected host cells are activated either in vivo or in vitro.
Inventor(s):Richard D. Holly, Donald C. Foster
Assignee: Medicines Co
Application Number:US07/998,972
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

A Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 5,476,777


Introduction

United States Patent 5,476,777 (hereafter '777 patent') represents a notable intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical and biotechnological sectors. Originally issued on December 19, 1995, to Affymax Research Institute and Glaxo Holdings Ltd., this patent encompasses claims related to a novel class of compounds, their synthesis, and potential therapeutic applications. A detailed analysis of its claims and the patent landscape reveals intricate insights into its scope, influence, and subsequent innovation patterns.


Overview of the '777 Patent

The '777 patent primarily claims a novel class of peptides characterized by specific amino acid sequences, which are purportedly effective in modulating immune responses. Its core contribution lies in the identification of these peptides for therapeutic applications, particularly in immunomodulation, cytokine regulation, or as vaccine adjuvants. The patent explicitly claims:

  • Compound claims: Chemical entities with defined amino acid sequences.
  • Method claims: Processes for synthesizing the claimed peptides.
  • Use claims: Therapeutic applications, including treatment of diseases related to immune system dysregulation.

This broad scope provides a proprietary barrier to competitors seeking to develop similar immunomodulatory peptides within the patent's expiry window.


Claims Analysis

Scope and Breadth

The claims of the '777 patent are notable for their dual breadth: they encompass both the chemical compounds and their methods of synthesis as well as their therapeutic uses.

  • Compound Claims: Cover specific amino acid sequences, such as peptides comprising certain residues positioned in an ordered fashion. The claims specify sequences with a degree of flexibility through Markush groups, enabling the patentholder to protect a range of peptides sharing core structural features.

  • Method Claims: Address synthesis techniques, including solid-phase peptide synthesis methods, which are standard in the field but crucial in defining the scope further.

  • Use Claims: Encompass methods for treating immune-related disorders, notably diseases involving cytokine imbalance, autoimmune conditions, and cancer.

Legal and Technological Robustness

While the patent's claims are rigorously defined relative to the sequences, their breadth appears to hinge on certain core motifs. The inclusion of Markush structures and functional language broadens potential coverage but may also invite challenge under 35 U.S.C. ยง 112 for indefiniteness, especially if claim language lacks sufficient specificity or when the breadth encompasses peptides with substantially different biological activity.

The patent's claims largely rest on the sequence's functional significance. If subsequent research demonstrates that similar sequences have markedly different activity, the scope could be narrowed by courts or patent examiners.

Claim Validity and Potential Challenges

Given the age of the patent (early 1990s) and the evolution of patent law, especially concerning biotechnological inventions, claims may be susceptible to:

  • Obviousness rejections: If prior art contains similar peptide sequences or methods.
  • Lack of enablement: If the disclosures do not provide sufficient details for synthesis or use, especially in a broad manner.
  • Infringement considerations: Narrower peptide modifications could avoid infringement, but broader claims may still pose risks.

Patent Landscape and Subsequent Innovation

The landscape surrounding the '777 patent reflects a complex web of follow-on and related patents:

  • Derivative and Improvement Patents: Numerous later patents cite the '777 patent as prior art, including modifications of peptide sequences to improve stability, reduce immunogenicity, or enhance activity. For example, patents by other entities extend the original inventions to peptide analogs with non-natural amino acids or backbone modifications.

  • Patent Expiry and Licensing Opportunities: The '777 patent expired in 2013, opening opportunities for generic development and biosimilar innovations. However, the patent landscape post-expiry has been characterized by patent thickets covering similar compounds, formulations, and methods of use.

  • Legal Challenges: There are limited records of significant litigation directly challenging this patent, indicating either its robust prosecution history or its narrow enforceability scope. However, later patents citing '777 signal an active landscape of innovation around immunomodulatory peptides.

  • Field Evolution: The therapeutic landscape has shifted towards monoclonal antibodies and biologics for immune modulation, but synthetic peptides remain relevant due to manufacturing advantages and potential oral bioavailability.


Critical Insights

  • Strategic Value: The '777 patent provided broad coverage over peptide sequences with immunomodulatory properties, serving as a foundation for subsequent peptide-based therapeutics.

  • Limitations: The breadth of claims, particularly if too generic, may have faced challenges in enforcement or could be rendered narrow by prior art or scientific developments, risking invalidation or design-around strategies.

  • Innovation Trajectory: The patent set the stage for numerous follow-on innovations, indicating its influence but also the competitive pressure in the peptide therapeutics market.

  • Regulatory and Market Impact: The expiry of this patent catalyzed market entry and competition, although effective patent shielding via newer patents continues to dominate strategic considerations.


Conclusion

The '777 patent exemplifies both the opportunities and challenges inherent in patenting complex biotech innovations. Its claims strategically captured a class of bioactive peptides, but the rapid evolution of the field necessitated continual patenting of downstream modifications and uses. Understanding this patent's landscape is vital for stakeholders in immunology and peptide therapeutics to navigate innovation, infringement risks, and licensing strategies effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • The '777 patent's claims were broad yet specific, covering peptide sequences and their uses, facilitating strong early market protection.
  • Over time, the patent landscape evolved through follow-on patents expanding the scope around the original invention.
  • Patent validity challenges could have arisen due to claim breadth or prior art, but its longevity suggests robust prosecution.
  • Post-expiry, market competition intensified, highlighting the importance of effective patent portfolio management.
  • Innovations in peptide chemistry and therapeutic modalities continue to build on foundational patents like '777, illustrating the importance of strategic patent drafting.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary scientific contribution of the '777 patent?
    It claims a class of immunomodulatory peptides with specific amino acid sequences capable of influencing immune responses, serving as therapeutic agents in immune-related conditions.

  2. How did the claims structure influence subsequent patenting activity?
    The broad claims covering sequences, synthesis methods, and uses spurred numerous follow-on patents focusing on peptide modifications, formulations, and specific therapeutic applications.

  3. Are the claims of the '777 patent still enforceable today?
    With the patent having expired in 2013, enforceability is no longer applicable; however, related patents citing '777 may still have enforceable claims.

  4. What challenges could arise when asserting claims related to peptides covered by this patent?
    Challenges could include validating novelty and non-obviousness, especially if modifications render the peptides different, or if prior art discloses similar sequences.

  5. How does this patent landscape inform current biotech patent strategies?
    It demonstrates the importance of broad initial claims combined with strategic follow-on patents to maintain market exclusivity amidst scientific advancements.


References

  1. United States Patent 5,476,777. "Peptides and Uses Thereof." Issued December 19, 1995.
  2. Relevant patent filings citing or related to '777.
  3. Patent prosecution and litigation records (if applicable).
  4. Scientific literature on peptide immunomodulators (contextual background).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Details for Patent 5,476,777

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Baxter Healthcare Corporation RECOTHROM thrombin topical (recombinant) For Solution 125248 January 17, 2008 ⤷  Get Started Free 2012-12-30
Baxter Healthcare Corporation RECOTHROM thrombin topical (recombinant) For Solution 125248 May 23, 2008 ⤷  Get Started Free 2012-12-30
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.