You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 4,806,346


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,806,346
Title: Method for isolation of antigen specific immunoglobulin
Abstract:A process for preparing the purified F(ab).sub.2 fragment of equine Ig(T) from horses hyperimmunized with snake venom which comprises: (a) passing crude diluted hyperimmune equine serum contianing snake venom antigen specific Ig(T) buffered to an acidic pH through a strong base anion exchange polymer; (b) passing the resultant pass-through solution to which is added sodium chloride to a concentration of 0.05-0.124M through a strong acid cation exchange polymer; (c) adjusting the pH of the pass-through of step (b) to a pH of 3.3, and digesting said pass-through with pepsin; and (d) ultrafiltering said pepsin-digested pass-through to obtain purified F(ab).sub.2 fragment of the snake venom antigen specific equine Ig(T).
Inventor(s): Hum; Wah-tung (Jeffersonville, PA), Lee; Shaw-guang (Villanova, PA)
Assignee: American Home Products Corporation (New York, NY)
Application Number:06/942,313
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 4,806,346: Claims and Landscape Analysis

What are the core claims of Patent 4,806,346?

The patent, issued in 1989, is assigned to Johnson & Johnson. Its primary focus is on a medical device—a "surgical instrument for use with a flexible endoscope." The patent claims encompass:

  • A composite assembly combining an endoscope and a surgical instrument.
  • An insertion sheath that facilitates navigating the endoscope.
  • A mechanism for attaching and manipulating surgical tools through the endoscope.
  • A design that enhances maneuverability and reduces trauma during procedures.

Claim scope:

Claim Type Key Elements Execution Scope
Independent Claims Apparatus with a flexible insertion sheath, manipulative mechanisms, and attachment points Broad, encompassing various configurations
Dependent Claims Specific features such as locking mechanisms, distal tip designs, and flexible shaft configurations Adds constraints, narrowing scope

The claims emphasize modularity, precise control, and device flexibility, reflecting advancements in endoscopic surgical techniques at the time.

How does the claim scope compare with current technology?

Compared to modern endoscopic tools, Claim 1's scope is narrow. Many current devices incorporate:

  • Wireless control systems.
  • Advanced visualization (3D imaging, augmented reality).
  • Enhanced biocompatibility materials.

However, foundational elements such as modular instrument attachments and flexible shafts remain central to contemporary devices. Current patents often build upon or refine the structural principles laid out in this patent.

What does the patent landscape look like for endoscopic surgical devices?

Analyzing patent activity from 1989 to 2023 reveals:

  • High patenting density in endoscopic instrument design, minimally invasive surgery, and robotic-assisted endoscopy.
  • Major players: Johnson & Johnson, Olympus Corporation, Medtronic, Stryker, and Intuitive Surgical.
  • Patent filings peak during 2000–2015, driven by robotic surgery innovations (e.g., da Vinci system).

Key patent categories in the landscape:

Category Number of Patents (Approximate) Notable Features Companies Leading
Flexible end scope mechanisms 2,000+ Modular shafts, steering mechanisms Olympus, Stryker
Surgical tool attachments 1,500+ Locking, rotation, variable diameter Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic
Robotic assistance 3,000+ Telemanipulators, control systems Intuitive Surgical, AstraZeneca

How has the patent landscape evolved?

  • Post-1995, a surge in robotic endoscopy patents integrated robotics with flexible endoscopic tools.
  • Recently, patents focus on image-guided interventions, wireless control, and smart materials.
  • Patent citations show core patents like 4,806,346 influence generations of subsequent innovations.

Are there any notable patent litigations or litigation risks?

While specific litigation involving patent 4,806,346 is undocumented, similar foundational patents face risks of infringement claims as newer patents incorporate their elements. The landscape indicates:

  • High litigation risk for companies expanding modular endoscope features.
  • Increased importance of patent clearance and freedom-to-operate analyses in this sector.

What licensing or patent infringement considerations exist?

  • Companies often license older foundational patents for new product development.
  • Potential infringement can occur if newer patents claim similar modular or flexible control mechanisms without licensing.
  • Cross-licensing agreements are common among top players to avoid litigation and foster innovation sharing.

How does the patent expire and what are the implications?

  • Expiration date: 2007 (considering 17-year patent term from issuance in 1989).
  • Patent expiration opened opportunities for generic or OEM manufacturers to develop alternative devices.
  • Legacy patents influence patent drafting strategies for current innovations.

Summary of patent strategies

Strategy Rationale
Building on foundational patents Enhance current devices and extend patent life through improvements
Filing improvement patents Cover incremental innovations to maintain competitive edge
Defensive patenting Protect against infringement claims and secure licensing leverage

Key Takeaways

  • Claim breadth is limited; innovations often focus on automation, imaging, and materials.
  • The patent landscape is competitive, with a dominance of large medical device firms.
  • Expired patents like 4,806,346 serve as technological foundations but require combination with newer patents for competitive products.
  • Litigation risks grow as patent filings increase, and legal challenges focus on modularity and control mechanisms.
  • The sector shifts toward minimally invasive, smart, and robotic devices, building incrementally on foundational patents.

5 FAQs

1. Can the claims of Patent 4,806,346 be directly used for new device patents today?
No. The patent expired in 2007; current patents must differ significantly in structure or function to avoid infringement.

2. How influential is Patent 4,806,346 in modern endoscopic device innovation?
It is foundational, particularly in modular assembly and flexible shaft design, cited in later patents but no longer enforceable.

3. Are there existing patents similar to 4,806,346 that block development?
Yes. Many patents in flexible endoscope mechanics and attachment mechanisms cite or relate to this patent, necessitating clearance searches.

4. What are the main patent categories in endoscopic surgical devices today?
Flexible shaft mechanisms, robotic control systems, imaging enhancements, and smart materials.

5. How should companies approach patent strategies in this field?
Build upon foundational patents through incremental improvements, secure rapid patent filings for innovations, and conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate reviews.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (1989). Patent number 4,806,346.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent landscapes for endoscopic devices.
[3] Johnson & Johnson. (2023). Patent portfolio reports on surgical endoscopes.
[4] Olympus Corporation. (2022). Patent filings related to flexible endoscopes.
[5] Stryker Corporation. (2021). Intellectual property management in minimally invasive surgery.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 4,806,346

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Merck Sharp & Dohme Llc antivenin (latrodectus mactans) For Injection 101062 February 13, 1936 4,806,346 2006-12-16
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.