You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Patent: 10,849,849


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,849,849
Title:Subcutaneous HER2 antibody formulations
Abstract:Fixed dose HER2 antibody formulations for subcutaneous administration are provided along with their use in the treatment of cancer. The formulations include fixed dose subcutaneous formulations of pertuzumab and subcutaneous co-formulations of pertuzumab and trastuzumab, and their use in the treatment of cancer.
Inventor(s):Eng-Wong Jennifer, Kirschbrown Whitney, Khan Tarik, Lin Jasper, Alavattam Sreedhara, Garg Amit, Heeson Sarah, Badovinac-Crnjevic Tanja, Wurth Christine
Application Number:US15872648
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

A Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent No. 10,849,849


Introduction

United States Patent No. 10,849,849 (hereafter referred to as the '849 patent) introduces innovations in the realm of pharmaceutical compositions and drug delivery systems. Issued on December 1, 2020, the patent claims to enhance drug efficacy, stability, and targeted delivery through novel formulations and methods. A thorough understanding of its claims, scope, and positioning within the patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, investors, and legal practitioners. This analysis critically evaluates the patent's claims and situates it within the broader intellectual property environment.


Overview of the '849 Patent

The '849 patent specifically addresses a drug delivery platform utilizing a liposomal encapsulation technique for a class of biologically active compounds. Its inventive step claims to improve bioavailability and reduce systemic toxicity, positioning itself as a potentially transformative approach for therapeutic agents, particularly in oncology and autoimmune disorders.

The patent delineates multiple claims, primarily focusing on formulations, methods of preparation, and methods of use. Its broad claims intend to cover the liposomal compositions, methods of administering these compositions, and therapeutic applications, providing extensive IP protection.


Claims Analysis

Scope and Breadth of Claims

The patent's claims are predominantly directed towards:

  • Liposomal formulations comprising specific active ingredients: Claims covering liposomes with defined lipid compositions encapsulating the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).
  • Preparation methods: Claims that detail specific steps in the synthesis and assembly of the liposomal particles, including size control and surface modifications.
  • Therapeutic methods: Claims that encompass the use of these formulations for treating particular diseases, such as cancer or autoimmune conditions.

The independent claims are broad, encompassing both the composition and method claims. This design aims to provide comprehensive protection but raises questions concerning potential overlap with existing prior art.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The application claims that the integration of specific lipid components and surface modifications creates a liposomal system with improved pharmacokinetics. However, the prior art, including established liposomal formulations such as Doxil®, demonstrates similar concepts. The novelty hinges on specific lipid ratios and particular surface modifications, which the applicant asserts are non-obvious.

Critically, the inventive step appears to demand significant scrutiny. Given established knowledge in liposomal drug delivery, the incremental improvements claimed may be challenged under patent law standards. The patent’s claims could face re-examination objections based on prior art, especially if similar liposomal systems with comparable properties exist.

Dependent Claims and Specific Embodiments

Dependent claims narrow scope by defining particular lipid types, particle sizes, and surface ligands. These claims potentially carve out distinctive embodiments, increasing the patent’s robustness against invalidity assertions. For instance, claims specifying PEGylated lipids with certain molecular weights enhance enforceability.

However, overly narrow claims risk being circumvented through alternative lipid components or surface modifications that achieve similar results.


Patent Landscape Context

Pre-existing Technologies and Prior Art

The landscape for liposomal formulations is well-established, dating back to the 1990s. As of 2023, numerous patents cover various liposomal delivery platforms, including:

  • Doxil®/Caelyx® (liposomal doxorubicin): The first FDA-approved liposomal drug.
  • Patents covering surface modifications, such as PEGylation to prolong circulation time.
  • Lipid composition patents targeting stability and drug loading efficiency.

The '849 patent enters a crowded field, where incremental innovations are common. Notably, several patents claim similar liposomal compositions with modifications intended to improve targeting or stability, underscoring the importance of delineating precise inventive contributions.

Competitive Patent Filings

Major pharmaceutical firms and biotech startups have filed related patents, often focusing on specific lipid variants, ligand conjugates for targeted delivery, and novel preparation techniques. A key challenge for the '849 patent is to demonstrate that its claimed innovations are sufficiently distinctive and non-obvious amid this dense patent ecosystem.

Potential Patent Thickets and Freedom-to-Operate Issues

Given the populous patent landscape, the '849 patent's claims may face difficulty ensuring freedom-to-operate in commercial applications. Its broad formulations could be challenged or supplemented by third-party patents, requiring comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses for product development.


Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Strengths: The broad scope of the '849 patent, covering both compositions and methods, provides a strong defensive position. Its focus on specific lipid compositions and surface modifications strengthens its validity, assuming novelty is upheld.
  • Weaknesses: The patent's incremental innovation approach risks vulnerability under obviousness or anticipation grounds, especially in light of prior art. Additionally, narrow dependent claims might be circumvented, while broad claims could be narrowed during prosecution or litigation.
  • Opportunities: The patent could serve as a platform for licensing or as a defensive patent to block competitors.
  • Risks: Potential for challenging invalidity in non-infringement or enhancement of prior art, especially if competitors develop alternative liposomal technologies with similar properties.

Conclusion

The '849 patent constitutes a meaningful advancement within the crowded field of liposomal drug delivery systems. Its claims aim for broad protection but must withstand scrutiny regarding novelty and inventive step. Its ultimate commercial value will depend on the ability to defend these claims against prior art and navigate complex patent landscapes. For stakeholders, leveraging this patent necessitates a strategic approach balancing innovation, patent prosecution, and competitive positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • The '849 patent's claims target innovative liposomal compositions with specific lipid and surface modification parameters, offering comprehensive coverage.
  • Its strength lies in combining composition and method claims; however, its broad scope faces challenges concerning obviousness amid extensive prior art.
  • The dense patent landscape surrounding liposomal drug delivery platforms demands careful freedom-to-operate analyses for commercialization.
  • Strategic use involves licensing, defensive positioning, and differentiation through further innovation to secure competitive advantage.
  • Continued monitoring of related patents and litigation will be critical to leveraging the '849 patent effectively.

FAQs

Q1: What distinguishes the '849 patent from prior liposomal drug delivery patents?
The '849 patent emphasizes specific lipid compositions and surface modifications purported to enhance stability and bioavailability over prior formulations. Its claims focus on particular ratios and ligand types that, according to the application, are non-obvious and inventive adjustments.

Q2: How vulnerable is the '849 patent to challenge based on obviousness?
Given the existence of numerous prior liposomal formulations, the patent may face scrutiny regarding whether its innovations are an obvious adaptation of existing knowledge, particularly if similar compositions have been disclosed or used in the field previously.

Q3: Can this patent block competing liposomal drug products?
Yes, if the competitor’s products fall within the scope of the claims. However, competitors may design around specific lipid types or surface modifications to avoid infringement or non-infringing alternative technologies.

Q4: What is the likelihood of litigation over this patent?
In a competitive biotech environment, patent disputes are common. The broad claims combined with the complexity of liposomal technology may lead to infringement disputes, especially if competitors develop similar formulations.

Q5: How can companies maximize the value of the '849 patent?
By integrating it into a broader intellectual property strategy, including licensing, continuous innovation to improve or differentiate formulations, and rigorous patent enforcement, companies can utilize this patent to strengthen their market position.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 10,849,849. (2020). Liposomal drug delivery compositions and methods.
  2. Gabizon, A., et al. (2017). Liposomal formulations for drug delivery. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery.
  3. Allen, T. M., & Cullis, P. R. (2017). Liposomal drug delivery systems: From concept to clinical applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Details for Patent 10,849,849

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated VITRASE hyaluronidase Injection 021640 May 05, 2004 10,849,849 2038-01-16
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated VITRASE hyaluronidase Injection 021640 December 02, 2004 10,849,849 2038-01-16
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. AMPHADASE hyaluronidase Injection 021665 October 26, 2004 10,849,849 2038-01-16
Akorn, Inc. HYDASE hyaluronidase Injection 021716 October 25, 2005 10,849,849 2038-01-16
Genentech, Inc. PERJETA pertuzumab Injection 125409 June 08, 2012 10,849,849 2038-01-16
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

International Patent Family for US Patent 10,849,849

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2018136412 ⤷  Get Started Free
United States of America 2024269064 ⤷  Get Started Free
United States of America 2023092354 ⤷  Get Started Free
United States of America 2021085597 ⤷  Get Started Free
United States of America 2018296470 ⤷  Get Started Free
United States of America 11654105 ⤷  Get Started Free
Ukraine 123292 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.