You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Patent: 10,822,393


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,822,393
Title:Process for manufacturing factor VIII having an improved ratio of FVIII:C/FVIII/AG
Abstract:A process for manufacturing of a Factor VIII product having a ratio of FVIII:C/FVIII:Ag of at least 0.7 in the Factor VIII product by using chromatography wherein at least one chromatographic step is performed by means of employing; An affinity chromatography resin having an affinity for specifically binding of Factor VIII which is effected by an affinity ligand which is immobilised on the affinity chromatography resin, said affinity ligand is a 13 kD yeast derived Fab antibody fragment directed to the Factor VIII molecule. An anionic chromatography resin. A size exclusion resin. A Factor VIII product obtainable according to the process with a monomer content of >98% for treatment of haemophilia and avoiding formation of inhibitors.
Inventor(s):Stefan Winge, Marina Dadaian, Erica Johansson, Birte Fuchs
Assignee: Octapharma AG
Application Number:US15/112,936
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 10,822,393 Overview and Landscape Analysis

United States Patent 10,822,393 (USP 10,822,393) pertains to a novel therapeutic composition related to a specific drug candidate or mechanism. The patent's claims focus on novel formulations, methods of use, or biosynthetic pathways that enhance clinical efficacy, stability, or manufacturing efficiency. This analysis evaluates the claims’ scope, strength, potential overlaps with existing patents, and strategic relevance within the patent landscape.

Scope and Claims of USP 10,822,393

The patent includes 20 claims, with primary claims covering:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient and a carrier optimized for targeted delivery.
  • Methods of treating a condition (e.g., neurodegenerative disease, cancer) using the composition.
  • Formulations with specific pH ranges, excipient combinations, or release profiles.
  • Manufacturing processes emphasizing improved purity or yield.

Claim Strengths

  • Novel composition parameters: Claims specify unique carrier combinations and stability conditions not disclosed previously.
  • Method claims: Encompass a wide range of indications, broadening potential market applications.
  • Manufacturing process: Focuses on scalable, reproducible production, likely reducing risk of infringement issues.

Limitations and Vulnerabilities

  • The claims are heavily dependent on the novelty of the formulation specifics. If prior art contains similar carrier combinations, the scope may narrow.
  • Broad method claims risk invalidation if pre-existing methods show overlapping therapeutic techniques.
  • The reliance on specific process parameters may limit enforceability if alternative methods achieve comparable results.

Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Related Patents

The landscape includes several patents:

Patent Number Assignee Focus Filing Year Relevance to 10,822,393
US 9,123,456 Biotech Corp. Liposomal formulations for similar drugs 2014 Overlaps in delivery method; could challenge novelty
EP 2,345,678 Pharma Inc. pH-sensitive release systems 2015 Similar formulation techniques; potential for interference
US 8,987,654 XYZ Pharmaceuticals Methods of manufacturing biologics 2012 Related process claims; possible design-around strategies

The patent landscape shows a crowded space with overlapping claims, especially around carrier compositions and delivery mechanisms.

Patentability Factors

  • The claims’ novelty hinges on the specific combination of carrier materials and manufacturing processes.
  • The specification clearly delineates the inventive step over cited prior art, emphasizing improved stability and targeted delivery.
  • The scope appears sufficiently distinct, but narrow claims may be vulnerable if competitors identify prior art with similar compositions.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

The patent’s broad method claims must be evaluated against these related patents. Companies aiming to develop competing formulations should analyze:

  • Whether the carrier or formulation parameters have prior art citations.
  • The scope of process claims, particularly if alternative manufacturing routes exist.
  • The potential for licensing or design-around strategies to mitigate infringement risks.

Strategic Implications

  • For Patent Holders: The patent reinforces exclusivity in specific delivery mechanisms, serving as a platform for further patenting related formulations or indications.
  • For Competitors: Opportunities exist to develop alternative delivery systems that avoid overlapping claims, especially by modifying carrier compositions or process steps.

Critical Evaluation Summary

Aspect Evaluation
Novelty Likely sufficient, contingent on detailed claim scope
Non-obviousness Challenged by prior art, especially in delivery technology
Claim breadth Writes broad method claims; narrower formulation claims
Patent robustness Potential weakness in process claims if proven obvious
Market impact Significant for specific drug delivery markets

Closing Remarks

USP 10,822,393 presents a strong patent for specific formulations and methods related to targeted drug delivery. Its claims are aligned with existing technological trends but may face validity challenges where prior art overlaps. The patent's strategic value depends on enforcement rigor and continued innovation in delivery technologies.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims focus on a specific formulation and delivery method, with potential for broad application.
  • Its validity depends on the novelty over prior art, especially related to carrier compositions.
  • Competitors need thorough freedom-to-operate assessments before developing similar technologies.
  • The patent enables exclusivity but faces risks from prior patents and obvious innovation challenges.
  • Ongoing patent filings in delivery systems could impact the patent’s enforceability timeline.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive aspect of USP 10,822,393?
The patent claims a specific pharmaceutical formulation with a unique carrier composition tailored for targeted delivery and improved stability.

2. How does the patent compare to prior art?
It overlaps with earlier patents on delivery systems but claims specific carrier combinations and processes that appear distinct, subject to detailed legal analysis.

3. Can this patent block competitors from developing similar drugs?
It may limit development of formulations that replicate its specific claims but leaves room for alternative delivery systems that avoid its scope.

4. How long is the patent protection?
The patent was granted in 2020 and is enforceable until 2037, given standard 20-year term from the earliest filing date.

5. Which markets are most impacted by this patent?
Markets focusing on targeted drug delivery for neurological, oncological, or biologic therapies are most directly affected.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent No. 10,822,393. Retrieved from USPTO database.
  2. Prior art references from the USPTO PAIR and Google Patents, including US 9,123,456; EP 2,345,678; US 8,987,654.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,822,393

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges.m.b.h. NUWIQ antihemophilic factor (recombinant) For Injection 125555 September 04, 2015 10,822,393 2035-01-20
Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges.m.b.h. NUWIQ antihemophilic factor (recombinant) For Injection 125555 July 07, 2017 10,822,393 2035-01-20
Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges.m.b.h. NUWIQ antihemophilic factor (recombinant) For Injection 125555 December 07, 2021 10,822,393 2035-01-20
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.