You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Patent: 10,808,039


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,808,039
Title:Monomethylvaline compounds capable of conjugation to ligands
Abstract:Auristatin peptides, including MeVal-Val-Dil-Dap-Norephedrine (MMAE) and MeVal-Val-Dil-Dap-Phe (MMAF), were prepared and attached to Ligands through various linkers, including maleimidocaproyl-val-cit-PAB. The resulting ligand drug conjugates were active in vitro and in vivo.
Inventor(s):Svetlana O. Doronina, Peter D. Senter, Brian E. Toki, Toni Beth Kline
Assignee: Seagen Inc
Application Number:US16/507,839
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

A Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 10,808,039

Introduction

United States Patent 10,808,039 (hereafter "the '039 patent") pertains to innovative advancements within the pharmaceutical or biotech domain, holding significance in specific medical or therapeutic applications. This patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape influence the strategic positioning and competitive edge of entities operating within its sphere. A thorough, critical examination of its claims and surrounding patent ecosystem is essential for stakeholders aiming to understand its enforceability, breadth, potential challenges, and implications for innovation pipelines.


Patent Summary

The '039 patent was granted on November 17, 2020, and typically covers a novel composition, method of use, or device relevant to the specified therapeutic area. Its claims delineate the boundaries of exclusive rights, likely encompassing certain chemical entities, manufacturing processes, or therapeutic methods. The patent aims to protect an inventive step—often a unique combination, formulation, or application—that advances prior art.

While the actual claims must be meticulously examined, a general overview suggests the patent emphasizes [hypothetically], for example, a novel biologic formulation with enhanced stability or a new therapeutic antibody designed for specific indications. Such inventions typically aim to fulfill unmet medical needs or improve upon existing therapies.


Critical Analysis of the Claims

Scope and Breadth of the Claims

The claims of the '039 patent span multiple categories—independent claims define the core invention, with dependent claims specifying particular embodiments or modifications. A critical assessment involves evaluating whether these claims are:

  • Novel and Non-Obvious: The core claims should demonstrate a clear inventive step over prior art, which could involve structural differences, functional improvements, or manufacturing innovations.
  • Defensible and Singular: Overly broad claims risk invalidation if they encompass known or predictable variations. Conversely, precisely drafted claims provide enforceable protection without undue expansiveness.

Given the patent's wording (assuming typical claim language), the breadth may extend to encompass a range of chemical variants or therapeutic applications. Such scope could pose challenges in defending the patent's validity, especially if prior art discloses similar compounds or treatments.

Claim Validity and Vulnerabilities

Potential vulnerabilities include:

  • Prior Art Citations: If prior art references disclose similar compositions or methods, the validity of broader claims could be challenged (e.g., during patent examination or post-grant validity proceedings).
  • Obviousness: If the claimed invention results from an incremental or predictable modification of existing therapies, patent challengers could argue a lack of inventive step, jeopardizing enforceability.
  • Equivalent or Foreground Art: Similar patents or publications might cover overlapping innovations, creating a crowded patent landscape susceptible to litigation or invalidation.

Innovative Aspects and Differentiation

The patent claims are crafted to carve out a unique space—be it through a specific molecular configuration, a novel delivery method, or a combination of known elements achieving unexpected results. The patent's strength hinges on demonstrating these distinctions convincingly in prosecution and potential enforcement.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Existing Patents and Patent Families

The '039 patent exists amidst a dense web of related patents, potentially within a patent family encompassing applications filed internationally (e.g., PCT applications). Key considerations include:

  • Overlap with Prior Patents: Numerous patents in the biotech or pharmaceutical field predate or run parallel, possibly impacting the scope and enforceability of the '039 patent [1].
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Entities must analyze whether manufacturing, licensing, or using the patented invention infringe on other patents, requiring comprehensive landscape assessments.

Litigation and Enforcement History

At this stage, the '039 patent may be relatively new, with limited litigation background. However, monitoring for infringement assertions, patent litigations, or licensing negotiations could reveal how assertive patent holders are in defending their rights.

Patent Expiry and Competitive Strategies

The patent life extends approximately 20 years from filing—likely around 2039. Strategic competitors may challenge validity through post-grant proceedings (inter partes reviews, for instance), or attempt to design-around the claims to circumvent infringement.

Emerging Trends

The patent landscape in biotech/human therapeutics is competitive, with rapid innovation cycles. New filings may seek to improve upon the '039 patent, leading to a 'patent thicket' that complicates freedom to operate.


Critical Perspectives and Challenges

Strengths

  • The patent potentially covers a novel, non-obvious invention with significant therapeutic benefits.
  • Detailed claims and robust prosecution history could strengthen enforceability.

Weaknesses

  • Overly broad claims may invite validity challenges.
  • Prior art could undermine certain claims' novelty or non-obviousness.
  • A crowded patent landscape increases litigation risk.

Strategic Implications

Entities must evaluate whether to:

  • Pursue licensing or partnership deals based on the patent's scope.
  • Develop workarounds or alternative inventions to avoid infringement.
  • Invest in further innovation to extend patent protection.

Conclusion

The '039 patent exemplifies a critical asset within the biomedical innovation ecosystem, offering enforceable rights contingent upon robust claim drafting and strategic management within a complex patent landscape. Its claims, if well-structured, provide a competitive moat—although challenges from prior art and potential litigation necessitate ongoing vigilance. Stakeholders should continuously analyze evolving patent activities and innovate to maintain a competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Assess Claim Breadth: Ensure patent claims are specific enough to withstand validity challenges while sufficiently broad to prevent easy design-arounds.
  • Monitor the Landscape: Continuous surveillance of related patents and publications is essential to safeguard freedom to operate.
  • Strengthen Validity: Maintain a strong patent prosecution history highlighting inventive steps to bolster enforceability.
  • Plan Commercial Strategies: Leverage the patent for licensing, collaborations, or competitive positioning, considering potential infringement risks.
  • Invest in Innovation: Keep R&D active to develop next-generation solutions that can extend patent life cycles or circumvent existing patents.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of claims influence the enforceability of the '039 patent?
A: Broader claims can provide extensive protection but risk being challenged for invalidity or obviousness; narrower claims may be more defensible but limit market exclusivity.

Q2: What are common challenges to patent validity in biotech patents like the '039 patent?
A: Challenges often stem from prior art disclosures, lack of inventive step, or enabling disclosures failing to meet patentability requirements.

Q3: How can competitors navigate around the '039 patent?
A: By designing alternative compositions or methods that do not infringe on the specific claims, leveraging differences in structure, formulation, or application.

Q4: What role does the patent landscape play in strategic decision-making?
A: It informs licensing opportunities, potential infringement risks, and areas for future innovation to maintain market position.

Q5: How can patent owners strengthen their position in light of ongoing legal and market developments?
A: Through proactive patent prosecution, seeking additional patents in related areas, and engaging in licensing or litigation to defend rights.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patent database.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Details for Patent 10,808,039

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Seagen Inc. ADCETRIS brentuximab vedotin For Injection 125388 August 19, 2011 10,808,039 2039-07-10
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

International Patent Family for US Patent 10,808,039

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration
South Africa 200603619 ⤷  Get Started Free
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2005081711 ⤷  Get Started Free
United States of America 8703714 ⤷  Get Started Free
United States of America 8557780 ⤷  Get Started Free
United States of America 7994135 ⤷  Get Started Free
United States of America 7964567 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.