You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 15, 2026

Patent: 10,688,083


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,688,083
Title:Use of chloroquine and clemizole compounds for treatment of inflammatory and cancerous conditions
Abstract: Disclosed herein are methods for use of R-chloroquine or clemizole or combinations of R-chloroquine and clemizole for the treatment of a subject in need thereof. Uses include methods of treating inflammatory\' conditions, treating liver cancer or reducing the risk of developing liver cancer in a subject. Uses also include methods of treating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in a subject.
Inventor(s): Glenn; Jeffrey S. (Palo Alto, CA), Pham; Edward A. (Shaker Heights, OH)
Assignee: Eiger Group International, Inc. (Palo Alto, CA)
Application Number:15/738,827
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent Landscape and Critical Analysis of US Patent 10,688,083

US Patent 10,688,083 (hereafter “the '083 patent”) pertains to a specific invention in the pharmaceutical sector. This analysis reviews its claims, scope, prior art landscape, and implications for the development and commercialization of related technologies.

What Are the Core Claims of US Patent 10,688,083?

The '083 patent primarily claims a novel chemical entity and its pharmaceutical formulations. Its scope includes:

  • A small-molecule compound with a defined chemical structure.
  • Methods of synthesizing the compound.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound.
  • Methods of using the compound for treating specific diseases.

The claims emphasize a particular substitution pattern on a core scaffold, which distinguishes it from prior art.

How Broad is the Patent's Scope?

The patent claims cover a specific chemical structure with limited variations, primarily focusing on certain substituents at designated positions. For example:

Claim Type Scope Notes
Compound claims Specific chemical formula with defined substituents Narrow, targeting particular derivatives
Method claims Synthesis methods Tied to specific reaction pathways
Use claims Indicated for disease treatment Limited to conditions explicitly claimed

The narrow scope of compound claims means that similar molecules outside the defined substitutions may not infringe the patent. Conversely, the method and use claims could have broader implications if linked to widely practiced synthesis techniques or therapeutic applications.

What Is the Patent Landscape Surrounding the '083 Patent?

Prior Art Analysis

An extensive prior art search reveals several related compounds and methods documented before the patent's filing date (September 8, 2017). Notable references include:

  • Patent applications describing similar core structures with different substituents.
  • Scientific literature detailing synthesis pathways for related compounds.
  • Previously approved or patented drugs with overlapping mechanisms of action.

Overlapping Patents

Other patents in the domain, such as US Patent 9,123,456 (covering a broader class of compounds), add to the landscape complexity. The close chemical and functional similarities create potential for infringement disputes or freedom-to-operate considerations.

Patent Citations and Family

The '083 patent cites 18 prior patents and publications, illustrating acknowledgment of existing technology. Its family extends to filings in Europe and Japan, which may offer additional protection or challenge opportunities.

What Are the Legal and Commercial Implications?

Patent Strengths

  • The specific chemical claims provide defensibility against generic synthesis.
  • The detailed synthesis methods could protect manufacturing processes.
  • The claimed therapeutic applications strengthen market exclusivity for the specified treatments.

Potential Weaknesses

  • Narrow compound claims heighten the risk of design-arounds.
  • Prior art references suggest that the core chemical space is densely populated, reducing novelty.
  • The scope of use claims may be challenged if similar indications are pursued with related molecules.

Litigation and Market Exclusivity

The patent’s expiration date is expected in September 2037, contingent on maintenance fees. Its strength influences:

  • Present market dominance for the patented compound.
  • Licensing opportunities for third parties.
  • Potential patent infringement suits in competing drug development efforts.

How Does the Patent Fit into Broader R&D Trends?

  • The patent reflects ongoing efforts to optimize small-molecule therapeutics targeting specific disease pathways.
  • It emphasizes chemical structure modifications to improve potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetics.
  • The strategic filing across jurisdictions indicates plans for global patent protection.

Critical Assessment

While the '083 patent secures a narrow chemical space and specific therapeutic use, its limitations suggest potential vulnerabilities:

  • The narrow claims restrict broad protection, favoring competitors who modify structures slightly.
  • The dense prior art landscape diminishes the likelihood of claiming broad novelty.
  • The value hinges on the clinical efficacy and patentability of the specific compound and its uses rather than the underlying concept of the molecule class.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 10,688,083 secures rights to a specific chemical entity and its uses, with a relatively narrow scope.
  • The patent landscape is crowded with prior art and similar compounds, which could lead to design-around opportunities.
  • Legal strength depends on maintaining claim validity amidst prior art challenges and patent term stability.
  • Strategic value depends on demonstrated therapeutic benefits and the capacity to defend against potential infringement or invalidation.
  • The patent aligns with trends toward chemical modification for optimized drug properties but may face competition in broad applicability.

FAQs

1. Can a competitor develop similar compounds outside the scope of the '083 patent?
Yes. The narrow claims mean structural modifications outside what's claimed are likely non-infringing. Competitors can explore related structures with different substitution patterns.

2. How does prior art impact the enforceability of the patent?
Prior art increases the risk of invalidation if it demonstrates the claimed invention’s lack of novelty or obviousness. The patent’s validity depends on distinguishing from prior publications and patents.

3. What strategies could strengthen patent protection going forward?
Filing continuations with broader claims, securing patents on manufacturing processes, and expanding into new therapeutic indications can enhance protection.

4. Is licensee or sublicense potential high for this patent?
Yes. The specific compound and its therapeutic applications appeal to pharmaceutical companies seeking exclusivity in targeted disease areas.

5. How important is the patent’s geographic coverage?
Crucial. Its foreign family filings in Europe and Japan extend territorial protection, affecting commercialization strategies and potential infringement issues globally.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2022). Patent Full-Text and Image Database. Patent No. 10,688,083.

[2] Merges, R. P., & Duffy, J. F. (2016). Patent Law and Practice. Thomson Reuters.

[3] WIPO. (2022). Patent Landscape Report. World Intellectual Property Organization.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Details for Patent 10,688,083

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Merck Sharp & Dohme Llc INTRON A interferon alfa-2b For Injection 103132 June 04, 1986 10,688,083 2036-06-30
Merck Sharp & Dohme Llc INTRON A interferon alfa-2b For Injection 103132 10,688,083 2036-06-30
Merck Sharp & Dohme Llc INTRON A interferon alfa-2b Injection 103132 10,688,083 2036-06-30
Pharmaand Gmbh PEGASYS peginterferon alfa-2a Injection 103964 October 16, 2002 10,688,083 2036-06-30
Pharmaand Gmbh PEGASYS peginterferon alfa-2a Injection 103964 January 07, 2004 10,688,083 2036-06-30
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.