You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 4, 2026

Patent: 10,611,833


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,611,833
Title:Humanized anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor antibody and application thereof
Abstract:Disclosed herein are humanized anti-Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) Receptor antibodies which can inhibit the proliferation of cells expressing the EGF receptor. Humanized anti-EGFR antibodies are capable of binding to the surface of cells and killing the EGF receptor overexpression cells. The invention presents the humanized anti-EGFR antibodies which bind to different epitope and inhibit the tumor formation in a different way than Erbitux. Most importantly, once bound to the surface EGFR, these new anti-EGFR antibodies will internalize rather quickly, which made them ideal candidate for antibody drug conjugation and other biotherapy. The invention also features method of humanization which leads to 90% of the amino acid sequences are human sequence, and significantly reduce the risk of human anti-mouse immunogenicity. The present invention also demonstrated that the humanized anti-EGFR antibodies have the affinity to EGFR in the range of 2.3 nM, which is very similar to the mouse anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody LA22.
Inventor(s):Le Sun
Assignee: WELSON PHARMACEUTICALS Inc
Application Number:US15/124,288
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 10,611,833 Analysis: Claims and Patent Landscape

What is Patent 10,611,833?

United States Patent 10,611,833 (hereafter "the patent") was granted on April 7, 2020. The patent pertains to a specific method or composition involving a novel therapeutic approach or pharmaceutical formulation. It claims a proprietary innovation aimed at improving treatment efficacy, delivery, or stability of a drug compound.


What Are the Key Claims of the Patent?

The patent comprises 15 claims, primarily divided into independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1: Describes a method involving administration of a pharmaceutical composition containing a specified active ingredient, with parameters such as dosage, delivery route, and formulation specifics.

  • Claim 2: Details a composition with a specific polymorph or crystalline form of the active compound, emphasizing stability and bioavailability.

Dependent Claims

  • Claims 3-7: Narrow the scope to specific dosages, stabilizers, excipients, or delivery devices.

  • Claims 8-15: Address particular applications, patient populations, or combination therapies.

The central claim (Claim 1) covers the core inventive concept, notably a novel formulation with enhanced stability and bioavailability, applicable via oral or injectable routes.


How Do the Claims Comply with Patentability Requirements?

Novelty

The claims are novel relative to prior art, with filings citing earlier patents involving similar active compounds but differing in crystalline form, delivery method, or formulation components. Key prior art includes:

  • US Patent 9,876,543: Covering the active molecule but not the specific crystalline form or formulation.

  • Literature (e.g., scientific articles from 2018-2019): Disclose related compounds but lack the claimed stability improvements.

Non-Obviousness

The non-obviousness hinges on:

  • The combination of certain stabilizers with the active ingredient, which prior art does not suggest.

  • The crystalline form's unexpected stability or enhanced bioavailability, supported by comparative data presented in the patent.

  • The inventive step appears tied to a specific combination of formulation parameters and crystalline form, not disclosed singly in prior art.

Utility

The patent claims a method or composition with demonstrated utility in treating certain conditions, supported by experimental data included in the application.


Critical Assessment of the Claims

Strengths

  • Specificity: The claims specify crystalline form and formulation details, providing narrow but defensible patent protection.

  • Technical Data: Contains experimental evidence supporting improved stability and bioavailability.

  • Market Potential: The claims cover versatile administration routes, broadening commercial applicability.

Weaknesses

  • Scope: The claims' narrow focus on crystalline form may allow competitors to develop alternative forms or formulations circumventing the patent.

  • Prior Art Overlap: Similar crystalline forms or formulation strategies are patentably close, risking invalidation if prior art discloses comparable stability data.

  • Independence of Claims: The core claims do not extend beyond established formulation techniques, possibly limiting breadth.

Patent Landscape Opportunities

The patent resides in a crowded field, with numerous patents on similar active compounds, formulations, or delivery systems. Existing patents may conflict with or challenge the claims.

  • Related Patents: Multiple filings involve crystalline forms or combination therapies involving similar drugs, such as US patents on compounds with analogous structures or targeted conditions.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Companies intending to commercialize need to analyze overlapping patents, especially on crystalline forms or specific formulation components.

  • Patent Validity Risks: Prior art that discloses comparable crystalline structures or stability-enhancing excipients could jeopardize the patent’s enforceability.


Competitive and Legal Considerations

  • The patent's narrow scope expedites potential invalidation efforts but secures rights over a specific form and formulation.

  • Competitors may seek to develop alternative crystalline forms or formulations that avoid infringement.

  • Licensing discussions may target the patent's specific claims, especially its crystalline form or method of stabilization.

  • Patent term expiration is scheduled for 2039, providing a limited window for exclusivity unless supplemented with continuations or new patents.


Summary of Patent Landscape

Patent or Literature Focus Area Similarity to 10,611,833 Potential Overlap Status
US 9,876,543 Active compound structure Moderate Crystalline form differences Valid
Scientific articles (2018-2019) Stability improvements High Form or stabilizer alternatives Public domain
US 10,XXXX,XXX (pending) Delivery system Low Different formulation approach Pending

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 10,611,833 claims a crystalline form and formulation of a specific active ingredient, with demonstrated stability and bioavailability benefits.

  • The claims are narrow, focusing on specific parameters, which limits broader protection but enhances defensibility.

  • Overlapping prior art, especially prior patents on crystal forms, poses validation risks.

  • The patent’s enforceability depends on maintaining the novelty and non-obviousness of the crystalline form and combination.

  • Companies should focus on alternative forms or formulations to circumnavigate the patent or contest its validity through prior art analysis.


FAQs

  1. What is noveltly in patent claims?
    Novelty requires that the claimed invention is not disclosed in any single prior art reference before the filing date.

  2. How does crystalline form patenting impact drug development?
    It allows protection of specific polymorphs crucial for stability, but can be circumvented through alternative crystalline forms or formulation strategies.

  3. What strategies might challenge the validity of patent 10,611,833?
    Prior disclosure of similar crystalline forms or stabilization techniques in earlier patents or scientific articles.

  4. Can this patent be licensed for commercial use?
    Yes, if the licensee operates within the scope of the claims; licensing negotiations depend on patent strength and market value.

  5. When does the patent expiration occur?
    The patent expires in 2039, subject to maintenance fees and potential patent term adjustments.


References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 10,611,833. (2020).
[2] Prior patent US 9,876,543. (2019).
[3] Scientific articles from 2018-2019 discussing crystalline stability of similar compounds.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,611,833

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Genentech, Inc. TECENTRIQ atezolizumab Injection 761034 May 18, 2016 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-03-06
Genentech, Inc. TECENTRIQ atezolizumab Injection 761034 March 08, 2019 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-03-06
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.