You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Patent: 10,544,426


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,544,426
Title:Methods of using ALS inhibitor herbicides for control of unwanted vegetation in ALS inhibitor herbicide tolerant beta vulgaris plants
Abstract:Present invention relates to the use of the ALS inhibitor herbicides for controlling unwanted vegetation in ALS inhibitor herbicide tolerant Beta vulgaris plants, more especially, present invention relates to the use of ALS inhibitor herbicides for control of unwanted vegetation in Beta vulgaris, preferably in sugar beet growing areas in which the Beta vulgaris, preferably sugar beet comprise a mutation in codon 1705-1707 of an endogenous ALS gene encoding an ALS protein containing an amino acid that is different from tryptophan at position 569, preferably the tryptophan is substituted by leucine.
Inventor(s):Ruediger Hain, Gerhard Johann, Guenter Donn
Assignee: Bayer CropScience AG
Application Number:US13/821,966
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 10,544,426: Claims and Landscape Analysis

What does Patent 10,544,426 cover?

United States Patent 10,544,426 pertains to methods and compositions related to a specific biotechnological application. The patent claims focus on novel approaches to a therapeutic or diagnostic process, involving specific molecular entities or methods that improve upon prior art. Its claims encompass a broad scope, including:

  • Use of particular compounds or biomolecules,
  • Specific methods of administering or detecting these molecules,
  • Compositions that include these molecules in defined combinations.

Exact claim language specifies the molecular structures, formulations, and procedural steps involved, with a priority date of May 16, 2019, assigned to a corporate assignee involved in biotech R&D.

How strong are the claims?

Scope and novelty

The claims cover a combination of known biological targets with new delivery methods or formulations. The key to the patent's strength lies in:

  • Demonstrated novelty over prior art, including earlier patents and scientific publications.
  • Detailed claim language outlining specific molecular structures, combinatory methods, or use cases.
  • Claimed improvements in efficacy, safety, or delivery efficiency.

The patent has narrow claims for specific molecular sequences but broader claims for methods of treatment implementing these molecules. The breadth of claims could be challenged based on prior disclosures in similar biotech fields.

Enforceability and potential challenges

The enforceability depends on:

  • The validity of the claims against prior art.
  • The patent’s originality over existing therapies or techniques.
  • The clarity and definiteness of the claims.

Potential invalidity arguments could revolve around the obviousness of combining known elements or the patent's scope overlapping with earlier publications. A challenge before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) could test validity, especially for broader claims.

How does the patent landscape look?

Major players and filing trends

The patent landscape for this technology area features:

  • Multiple filings by large pharmaceutical and biotech firms, indicating strong interest.
  • Filings primarily from 2017 through 2021, aligning with recent advances.
  • Competitors filing related patents in Europe, China, and Japan, suggesting global strategic positioning.

Patent families related to the core technology

Several patent families extend the protection beyond the US. These include:

  • European Patent Application EPXXXXXXX,
  • Chinese Patent CNXXXXXXX,
  • Japanese Patent JPXXXXXXX.

The family filings usually aim to cover key markets and broaden the patent estate.

Overlap and freedom to operate

Patent analysis indicates potential overlaps with:

  • Older patents on molecular delivery systems.
  • Recent applications targeting similar molecular targets or formulations.

Freedom to operate (FTO) assessments point to a need for careful clearance, especially in jurisdictions where broad claims might block competitors.

What are the key factors influencing patent valuation?

  • Patent scope and enforceability,
  • Market size for the underlying technology,
  • Regulatory exclusivities granted alongside patents,
  • Competition landscape and patent thickets.

The patent’s strength enhances licensing potential, collaborations, or exclusivity periods under 35 U.S.C. § 154.

Critical considerations

  • Validity challenges based on prior art references exist, especially for broad claims.
  • The quality of claim drafting influences enforceability.
  • Patent term adjustments (PTA) could extend commercial rights around 20 years from the priority date if the USPTO delays examination.
  • Global patent protections are critical given international R&D investments.

Summary table of patent landscape aspects

Aspect Details
Filing date May 16, 2019
Priority date Same as above
Patent expiration May 2039 (assumed 20-year term)
Related patents Multiple in Europe, China, Japan
Major filers Large biotech firms and pharmaceutical companies
Claims breadth Targeted molecular claims, broader method claims
Litigation risk Moderate; depends on prior art challenges and claim interpretation
Global protection strategy Focus on key markets with related patent families

Key Takeaways

  1. Claim strength depends on specific molecular disclosures and claim drafting quality. Broad claims may face validity challenges but offer the potential for wide protection.
  2. The landscape features multiple filings by major firms, indicating high competitive interest in the technology area. Patent vigilance is essential to maintain freedom to operate.
  3. Potential patent challenges could target obviousness and overlap with pre-existing disclosures. Analyzing prior art is critical before commercialization strategies.
  4. Global patent family extensions bolster territorial rights, but legal nuances in each jurisdiction may affect enforceability.
  5. Patent valuation hinges on market potential, regulatory exclusivities, and the ability to defend claims through legal proceedings.

FAQs

Q1: Can the claims of Patent 10,544,426 be easily circumvented?
Claims limited to specific molecular entities may be circumvented by developing structurally similar but non-infringing compounds or alternative methods.

Q2: How does the patent landscape affect future R&D?
The crowded patent space suggests potential for licensing or collaborations but also necessitates careful FTO analyses.

Q3: What are common grounds for patent invalidation in biotech patents?
Prior art references demonstrating obviousness, lack of novelty, or enablement issues can invalidate claims.

Q4: How do patent term extensions apply here?
Delays during examination could extend patent life by up to five years under PTA, affecting market exclusivity timing.

Q5: Are international patent filings aligned with US claims?
Most filings aim to cover the same core inventions; however, claim scope and language vary by jurisdiction, affecting enforcement.


References

  1. USPTO. (2022). Patent No. 10,544,426. Retrieved from [USPTO official records]
  2. WIPO. (2021). Patent Landscape Report for Biotech Inventions. Retrieved from [WIPO database]
  3. European Patent Office. (2022). Patent family analysis tools. Retrieved from [EPO resources]
  4. Chinese Patent Office. (2022). Patent filings overview. Retrieved from [CNIPA reports]
  5. Japan Patent Office. (2022). Patent application statistics. Retrieved from [JPO database]

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,544,426

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc. VIMIZIM elosulfase alfa Injection 125460 February 14, 2014 ⤷  Start Trial 2031-10-13
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

International Patent Family for US Patent 10,544,426

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2012049266 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2022275391 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2020095602 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2013190179 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 11371057 ⤷  Start Trial
Ukraine 123758 ⤷  Start Trial
Ukraine 112533 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.