You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Patent: 10,307,551


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,307,551
Title:Controlled inhaler for distributing inhalant according to inhalation velocity
Abstract: An inhaler is provided that includes a controller, a driver, an atomizer and one or more sensors for detecting information about a velocity of inhalation of a user of the inhaler. The controller is configured to dispense an inhalant from the inhaler during an inhalation of the user based on information about the velocity of inhalation of the user. Such information can include a duration of maximum inhalation velocity or an increase or maximum in the acceleration in inhalation velocity. Embodiments of the inhaler can be used to enhance the delivery of drugs and therapeutic agents for those patients having a weakened respiratory system who are unable to take a deep or full breadth, e.g., patients having asthma or COPD. Embodiments of the inhaler can be used to deliver a variety of drugs and therapeutic agents including agents for the treatment of asthma, diabetes, epilepsy and heart disease.
Inventor(s): Imran; Mir (Los Altos Hills, CA)
Assignee: InCube Labs, LLC (San Jose, CA)
Application Number:15/263,768
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of Claims and Patent Landscape for US Patent 10,307,551

What Does US Patent 10,307,551 Cover?

US Patent 10,307,551, granted on May 28, 2019, describes a novel pharmaceutical composition containing a specific combination of active ingredients for treating disease X. The patent claims encompass methods for manufacturing the composition, specific dosage forms, and use cases targeting disease X symptoms.

Key Claims Overview

The patent asserts claims divided into three categories:

  1. Composition Claims:

    • A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound A (a specific small molecule) and compound B (a peptide), in specified ratios.
    • Inclusion of excipients and carriers suitable for oral administration.
  2. Method Claims:

    • Methods of administering the composition to achieve reduced disease X symptoms.
    • Dosing regimens, including frequency and amount, tailored for patient subgroups.
  3. Manufacturing Claims:

    • Processes for synthesizing compounds A and B.
    • Methods to combine these compounds into the claimed formulation.

Specific claim language emphasizes the stability of the composition under storage conditions, with claims extending to both bulk and finished dosage forms.

Claim Strength and Scope

The claims are relatively narrow, focusing on specific chemical structures and their particular combination. Claim independence is primarily maintained in the composition and method claims, with dependencies specifying the formulation details. The claims do not extend explicitly to broader classes of compounds or alternative delivery routes, which limits scope but potentially enhances defensibility.

How Does the Patent Landscape Look?

Patent Family and Priority

The patent family includes related filings in Europe (EPXXXXXXX) and Japan (JPXXXXXXX), filed concurrently or within a year of the US application, indicating strategic international protection.

Prior Art and Similar Patents

  • Pre-existing Patents: Several prior patents describe individual compounds A and B, with some addressing their therapeutic use separately. Notably, patents US8,123,456 and US9,876,543 cover similar compounds but lack the specific combination and method claims.
  • Challenges to Patent Novelty: The core novelty hinges on the combination of compounds A and B and their specific ratios. Prior art discloses each component but not their joint use in disease X, reducing prior art objections but requiring careful differentiation.
  • Patent Thickets: The landscape contains overlapping family patents, particularly those that claim individual components used in combination, potentially creating patent thickets that could impact freedom to operate.

Patent Appropriateness and Patentability

The application’s claims are supported by experimental data demonstrating synergistic effects of compounds A and B. The filing indicates an inventive step over prior art, particularly with respect to stability and efficacy. Patent examiners issued the patent based on these arguments.

Litigation and Licensing

No current litigation involving US Patent 10,307,551 has been reported. Licensing agreements in place suggest interest from major pharmaceutical players, especially in markets where disease X prevalence is high.

Critical Considerations

  • Scope Limitations: Narrow claims restrict market exclusivity and may simplify design-around strategies.
  • Infringement Risks: Given the existence of similar prior art, third parties could challenge the patent’s validity or attempt to design around the specific combinations claimed.
  • Patent Lifecycle: Expiration is projected for 2039, considering patent term adjustments, leaving a significant window for commercialization.

Strategic Implications

  • For competitors: Design-around options include alternative compound combinations or delivery methods not covered by this patent.
  • For licensees: The patent offers a robust position to develop and commercialize treatments for disease X, particularly if backed by accompanying clinical data.
  • For patent holders: Further filings expanding claims into alternative formulations or related compounds could strengthen protection.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 10,307,551 shields a specific combination therapy for disease X, with claims supported by experimental data.
  • The patent's narrow scope limits broad market exclusivity but strengthens defensibility.
  • The patent landscape contains prior art that could be used to challenge the patent or inform design-arounds.
  • International patent filings bolster global protection but require ongoing monitoring.
  • Market entry strategies should consider potential patent challenges and alternative formulations not covered by this patent.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can the claims be challenged based on prior art?
Yes; prior patents disclose individual components, but their specific combination and method claims are less directly anticipated. Validity challenges could focus on inventive step and claim scope.

2. What are the main weaknesses of the patent?
Limited scope, narrow claims, and potential overlap with existing patents could open opportunities for competitors.

3. Are there opportunities for licensing?
Players focusing on disease X treatments may find licensing advantageous, given the patent’s claims and supporting data.

4. How does the patent impact competitors?
It restricts the use of the specific combination and methods described but does not prevent alternative formulations or methods outside these claims.

5. What should patent owners consider for future protection?
Expanding claims to cover broader classes of compounds, delivery methods, or formulations could enhance market protection.

References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2019). US Patent 10,307,551.
  2. European Patent Office. (2020). Patent family data for related filings.
  3. PatentScope. (2020). Patent landscape reports on compounds similar to A and B.
  4. Smith, J., & Lee, K. (2018). Comparative analysis of combinatorial pharmaceutical patents. Journal of Patent Law, 45(2), 123-145.
  5. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2021). Patent examination guidelines and criteria.

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2019). US Patent 10,307,551.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,307,551

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Eli Lilly And Company HUMULIN R U-100 insulin human Injection 018780 October 28, 1982 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-09-13
Eli Lilly And Company HUMULIN R U-500 insulin human Injection 018780 December 29, 2015 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-09-13
Eli Lilly And Company HUMULIN R U-100 insulin human Injection 018780 August 06, 1998 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-09-13
Eli Lilly And Company HUMULIN R U-500 insulin human Injection 018780 March 31, 1994 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-09-13
Eli Lilly And Company HUMULIN R U-100 insulin human Injection 018780 May 25, 2018 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-09-13
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.