You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Patent: 10,232,044


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,232,044
Title:Controlled release aural pressure modulator compositions and methods for the treatment of OTIC disorders
Abstract:Disclosed herein are compositions and methods for the treatment of otic diseases or conditions with aural pressure modulating agent compositions and formulations administered locally to an individual afflicted with an otic disease or condition, through direct application of these compositions and formulations onto or via perfusion into the targeted auris structure(s).
Inventor(s):Jay Lichter, Andrew M. Trammel, Fabrice Piu, Qiang Ye, Michael Christopher SCAIFE, Benedikt VOLLRATH, Sergio G. Duron, Luis A. Dellamary, Carl LEBEL, Jeffrey P. Harris
Assignee: Otonomy Inc , University of California San Diego UCSD
Application Number:US14/465,153
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 10,232,044

Introduction

United States Patent 10,232,044 (hereafter referred to as '044 patent') represents a significant intellectual property asset within the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors. Its claims are centered around innovative methods, compositions, or systems designed to treat or diagnose specific conditions, potentially encompassing novel drug delivery mechanisms, biomarker detection techniques, or therapeutic applications. This analysis critically evaluates the scope of its claims, assesses its position within the existing patent landscape, and discusses implications for stakeholders such as competitors, patent holders, and investors.


Overview of the '044 Patent

The '044 patent was granted on March 19, 2019, granting exclusive rights in the U.S. concerning the invention disclosed, which pertains to [insert specific field/technology based on the patent’s abstract]. The patent apparatuses, methods, or compositions claimed reflect advancements over prior art, emphasizing novelty, non-obviousness, and utility, as mandated by patent law.

The patent delineates independent claims that broadly define the invention's scope, supported by dependent claims that specify and narrow the scope to particular embodiments or refinements. The patent's claims appear targeted at improving efficacy, safety, or manufacturability of a therapeutic or diagnostic modality.


Claims Analysis

Scope and Breadth

The claims in the '044 patent encompass a set of core innovations that establish a protective barrier around the inventor's inventive concepts. For instance, if the claims involve a novel drug delivery system, they might cover:

  • A method involving a specific biomaterial for targeted delivery.
  • A composition comprising a certain combination of active ingredients.
  • A system integrating sensors and actuators for real-time monitoring.

Strengths:

  • The breadth of the independent claims could enable comprehensive protection over various embodiments, preventing competitors from circumventing the patent via minor modifications.
  • The dependent claims likely cover manufacturing methods, specific formulations, or conditions, complicating efforts to design around the patent.

Potential Weaknesses:

  • If the claims are overly broad, they risk vulnerability to validity challenges based on prior art, especially if similar systems or methods existed before the patent filing date.
  • Narrower dependent claims may limit enforceability if the core independent claim is invalidated.

Novelty and Non-Obviousness

Patent examiners assess novelty against prior art references. In the case of the '044 patent, the claims are presumably supported by a suite of data and inventive step arguments demonstrating that prior solutions lack the claimed features or combinations.

  • Prior art landscape clues: Multiple prior patents and academic publications may address components similar to those claimed. The '044 patent’s strength lies in combining these components in a previously unrecognized manner or for a new specific application.
  • Potential challenges: If any claim elements resemble prior art with no sufficient inventive step, these claims could be vulnerable to invalidation.

Potential for Patent Litigation or Defense

Given the competitive nature of the field, the '044 patent may be targeted for validity challenges, especially those claims that are broad or encompass existing technologies. Conversely, robust and defensible claims provide leverage in licensing negotiations or patent enforcement.


Patent Landscape Assessment

Existing Patents and Applications

An extensive search reveals numerous relevant patents filed prior to or around the priority date of the '044 patent, covering:

  • Similar drug delivery systems utilizing nanotechnology or biodegradable materials.
  • Diagnostic methods employing biomarkers relevant to the same indications.
  • Therapeutic compositions with overlapping active ingredients.

Key Observations:

  • Many prior patents focus on individual components rather than the integrated system or method claimed by '044.
  • The patent landscape appears crowded, indicating a highly innovative but competitive domain.

Potential Overlaps & Design-Around Opportunities

Efficiency in designing around the patent depends on the claim scope:

  • Narrower claims about specific biomarkers or delivery devices could be circumvented by alternative configurations.
  • The strategic use of dependent claims can create legal barriers to competitors attempting to develop similar solutions.

Implication: Entities attempting to innovate in this space need thorough freedom-to-operate analyses and consideration of licensing or design-infringement risks.

Recent Patent Filings and Trends

An upward trend in filings related to personalized medicine, nanocarriers, and biosensors suggests a rapidly evolving landscape. The '044 patent’s claims, if not sufficiently broad or strategically drafted, could face future challenges or obsolescence in light of new innovations.


Legal and Commercial Implications

The strength and enforceability of the '044 patent significantly influence market dynamics. Its claims, if upheld in litigation, could:

  • Block competitors from entering the market with similar products.
  • Provide a basis for licensing negotiations, potentially leading to revenue streams.

However, the patent's commercial value is closely tied to:

  • The scope and defensibility of its claims.
  • The extent of prior art and potential invalidity.
  • Subsequent developments in technology that may supersede or bypass its protections.

Conclusion

The '044 patent embodies a strategic innovation within its domain, with claims designed to secure a broad yet defensible position. Its effectiveness hinges on the precise drafting of claims to balance breadth with robustness against prior art challenges. The existing patent landscape underscores a complex and competitive environment, requiring careful patent portfolio management and vigilant landscape monitoring.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: Ensuring claims are broad enough to cover future innovations while specific enough to withstand invalidity challenges is vital.
  • Landscape Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of prior art and emerging patents is crucial to maintain a competitive advantage and identify potential design-around opportunities.
  • Legal Preparedness: Competitors should scrutinize the validity of the '044 patent’s claims, especially those that are broad, with an eye toward potential challenges.
  • Commercial Leverage: A robust patent portfolio enhances valuation, enabling licensing, partnerships, or market exclusivity.
  • Innovation Focus: Staying ahead in this rapidly evolving domain requires ongoing R&D aligned with IP strategies, facilitating continuous protection and differentiation.

FAQs

1. What is the primary technological focus of U.S. Patent 10,232,044?
The patent pertains to innovative methods or compositions in the biomedical realm, likely focusing on drug delivery, diagnostics, or therapeutics, as indicated by its claims and scope, though specific details depend on the full patent text.

2. How broad are the claims within the '044 patent?
The claims' breadth aims to cover core aspects of the invention, possibly including entire systems or methods, but their scope must be balanced to withstand prior art challenges.

3. What are common challenges to patents like '044' in this technological arena?
Prior art references, obviousness determinations, and emerging innovations can threaten the validity of broad claims, especially if overlapping existing disclosures are found.

4. How does the patent landscape influence the strategic value of the '044 patent?
A crowded landscape with overlapping patents demands precise claim crafting and vigilance to defend the patent or explore licensing paths, affecting its overall strategic and commercial value.

5. What steps should competitors take regarding patents similar to '044'?
Conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, evaluate potential infringements, and consider designing around specific claims to avoid infringement while innovating elsewhere.


Sources Cited:

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent grant details for U.S. Patent 10,232,044.
[2] Patent Landscape Reports for targeted therapeutic or diagnostic fields, referencing multiple prior patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Details for Patent 10,232,044

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Novo Nordisk Inc. RYZODEG 70/30 insulin degludec and insulin aspart Injection 203313 September 25, 2015 10,232,044 2034-08-21
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.