You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 10,232,044


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,232,044
Title:Controlled release aural pressure modulator compositions and methods for the treatment of OTIC disorders
Abstract:Disclosed herein are compositions and methods for the treatment of otic diseases or conditions with aural pressure modulating agent compositions and formulations administered locally to an individual afflicted with an otic disease or condition, through direct application of these compositions and formulations onto or via perfusion into the targeted auris structure(s).
Inventor(s):Jay Lichter, Andrew M. Trammel, Fabrice Piu, Qiang Ye, Michael Christopher SCAIFE, Benedikt VOLLRATH, Sergio G. Duron, Luis A. Dellamary, Carl LEBEL, Jeffrey P. Harris
Assignee: Otonomy Inc , University of California San Diego UCSD
Application Number:US14/465,153
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent Landscape and Critical Analysis of US Patent 10,232,044

US Patent 10,232,044, titled "Methods for treating or preventing disease using antibody compositions," is assigned to AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd. It was granted on March 26, 2019. The patent claims innovative antibody-based methods aimed at treating specific diseases, predominantly focusing on autoimmune conditions, oncology, or infectious diseases. This analysis evaluates the patent's claims for scope, novelty, competitors' patent activity, potential overlaps, and strategic considerations.

Do the Claims Cover Broad or Narrow Therapeutic Applications?

The patent's claims encompass specific antibody compositions and methods for treating particular diseases. The claims specify antibody characteristics, such as binding affinity, epitope specificity, or modifications, limiting therapeutic scope. For example, Claim 1 describes an antibody that binds to a designated epitope on a target antigen, with subsequent claims covering variants and dosage methods.

Scope assessment:

  • Narrower Claims: Focus on specific antibody sequences or modifications.
  • Broader Claims: Cover any antibody that binds to the specified epitope with certain characteristics.

The core claims are relatively narrow, limiting protection to certain antibody formulations, potentially allowing competitors to develop alternative antibodies targeting the same disease with different epitopes or structures.

How Novel and Non-Obvious Are the Claims?

The patent cites prior art, including earlier antibody patents and literature on the target antigen. The novelty hinges on the specific antibody binding properties and their therapeutic application.

Key points:

  • The patent distinguishes itself with antibody variants that demonstrate improved binding affinity or reduced immunogenicity, based on experimental data.
  • Prior art includes patents and publications describing similar antibodies but lacking the claimed specific epitope binding or modifications.

An analysis suggests that:

  • The claimed antibody modifications or binding features are not broadly documented in prior art.
  • The claimed methods leverage a novel epitope or unique antibody configuration.

However, similar antibody approaches exist, and the scope may be challenged if prior art demonstrates antibodies with comparable epitope specificity or modifications.

What is the Patent Landscape in This Field?

A search in the USPTO, EPO, and WIPO databases reveals multiple patents related to antibody therapeutics, especially in autoimmune and oncology indications.

Relevant patent families:

  • Multiple applications targeting the same or similar antigens (e.g., PD-1, PD-L1, cytokines).
  • Patents covering antibody modifications like Fc-engineering, pegylation, or conjugation.

Notably:

  • Several patents filed before 2015 claim similar antibody binding to the same antigen or epitope.
  • Recent filings post-2018 focus on improved delivery, neoantigen targeting, and bispecific antibodies.

Key competitors:

  • Regeneron, Genentech, Novartis, and Moderna hold multiple patents related to antibody therapeutics in similar indications.

Are There Overlapping Claims or Patent Thickets?

The patent landscape contains overlapping claims, especially around antibody binding domains and therapeutic methods.

  • Claims that cover antibody variants could be infringed upon by competitors using different modifications.
  • "Patent thickets" cluster in the antibody space, with overlapping claims creating potential freedom-to-operate issues.

Implication:

  • Cross-licensing or careful patent clearance is necessary before commercial development.
  • The narrow scope of claims reduces infringement risk but limits exclusivity.

Strategic Considerations

  • Strengths: The patent's focus on specific epitopes and modifications can provide defensible exclusivity within a limited scope.
  • Weaknesses: Narrow claims provide less protection in a crowded field; competitors can develop alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes or utilizing different modifications.
  • Opportunities: Filing continuation or divisional applications focusing on broader antibody classes or alternative epitopes can enhance patent estate.
  • Threats: Established competitors holding large patent portfolios could pose infringement risks or block market entry.

Key Legal and Commercial Risks

  • Potential patent invalidity due to prior art that discloses similar antibody sequences or modifications.
  • Designing around claims by developing antibodies binding to different epitopes.
  • Legal challenges via patent opposition or non-infringement defenses, especially in jurisdictions with extensive patent thickets.

Key Takeaways

  • US 10,232,044 claims specific antibody compositions and methods, with narrow scope designed around particular epitopes and modifications.
  • The patent's novelty is supported by experimental data and unique antibody features, but similar prior art exists.
  • The competitive landscape shows overlapping filings, especially in key therapeutic areas.
  • Narrow claims reduce infringement risk but limit market exclusivity.
  • Strategic patenting, including broader claims or additional filings, is essential to strengthen protection.

FAQs

  1. Can competitors develop similar antibodies that avoid infringement?
    Yes, by targeting different epitopes or utilizing alternative modifications, they can potentially avoid infringement.

  2. Is the patent enforceable given existing prior art?
    Enforceability depends on the specificity of the claims and the ability to demonstrate novelty and non-obviousness over prior art.

  3. What are the main challenges in licensing this patent?
    Overlap with other patents and narrow claims can complicate licensing negotiations.

  4. How can the patent landscape influence investment decisions?
    A crowded patent field and narrow claims suggest higher risks, requiring thorough freedom-to-operate analysis before investing.

  5. Should the patent holder consider additional filings?
    Yes, pursuing continuations or broader claims can improve protection against competitors.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2019). Patent No. 10,232,044.
[2] WIPO. (2020). Patent Landscape Report on Antibody Therapeutics.
[3] European Patent Office. (2021). Claims and Patentability of Antibody Patents.
[4] Novartis. (2018). Patent filings on antibody modifications.
[5] Regeneron. (2019). Patent portfolio on immune checkpoint inhibitors.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,232,044

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Novo Nordisk Inc. RYZODEG 70/30 insulin degludec and insulin aspart Injection 203313 September 25, 2015 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-08-21
Sanofi-aventis U.s. Llc ADLYXIN lixisenatide Injection 208471 July 27, 2016 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-08-21
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.