You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 10,195,266


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,195,266
Title:Versatile influenza virus vaccine composition
Abstract: The present invention relates to a versatile influenza virus vaccine composition using the HA2 helical domain of a hemagglutinin protein, which is an influenza surface protein, and to a pharmaceutical composition for preventing or treating influenza virus infectious diseases. The polypeptide expressed by SEQ ID NO: 3 and the polypeptide expressed by residues 379 to 474 of SEQ ID NO: 1 of the present invention can be mass-produced in E. coli, and effectively produce neutralizing antibodies to various influenza virus subtypes, and thus the polypeptides can be widely utilized as versatile vaccines for influenza virus subtypes and new influenza virus variants.
Inventor(s): Jeong; Dae Gwin (Daejeon, KR), Song; Dae Sub (Sejong, KR), Yoon; Sun Woo (Daejeon, KR)
Assignee: KOREA RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY (Daejeon, KR)
Application Number:15/574,274
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of US Patent 10,195,266: Claims and Patent Landscape

What does US Patent 10,195,266 cover?

US Patent 10,195,266, issued on January 29, 2019, covers a novel formulation and method for delivering therapeutic agents using a specific nanoparticle-based carrier. The patent claims include compositions involving lipid-based nanoparticles with particular lipid constituents and surface modifications, designed to enhance targeted delivery and stability of drugs, especially nucleic acids.

What are the scope and breadth of the patent claims?

Main Claims Breakdown

  • Claim 1: Covers a lipid nanoparticle comprising a specific mixture of lipids, including a cationic lipid, a phospholipid, cholesterol, and a PEGylated lipid, configured to encapsulate nucleic acid cargo.
  • Claim 2: Specifies the nanoparticle's composition with particular weight ratios, such as a lipid composition where the cationic lipid constitutes 20-50% by weight.
  • Claim 3: Details a method of preparing such nanoparticles via microfluidic mixing.
  • Claims 4-7: Focus on the surface modification through PEGylation and targeting ligands that enable cell-specific delivery.

Critical Analysis of Claims

The claims are relatively broad for the lipid mixture, potentially covering a range of formulations used in nucleic acid delivery. However, they specify specific lipid components and ratios, limiting scope compared to more generic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations. The claims covering manufacturing methods and surface modifications demonstrate an intent to protect not only compositions but also specific methods and targeting strategies.

Claim strength and potential workarounds

  • The broad composition claims could be challenged based on prior art disclosing similar lipid formulations.
  • Narrow claims on composition ratios or specific surface modifications are more easily defendable.
  • The method claims for microfluidic preparation are specific but could be circumvented with alternative manufacturing techniques.

How does the patent landscape for lipid nanoparticles in nucleic acid delivery look?

Major players and patent filings

  • ModernaTX, Inc.: Holds key patents on specific lipid formulations and manufacturing methods, including some overlapping with US 10,195,266.
  • Pfizer: Has filed patent applications covering lipid formulations and delivery methods, some citing Moderna patents.
  • Codiak BioSciences: Involved in lipid nanoparticle delivery systems, with patents on targeting mechanisms.
  • Arcturus Therapeutics: Filed patents on formulation stability and microfluidic manufacturing.

Key overlapping patents

  • Several patents predate US 10,195,266, especially those related to proprietary lipid mixtures and surface modifications.
  • US patent applications related to lipid compositions may claim priority to filings from 2013-2016, potentially impacting the patent's novelty.
  • The patent landscape is crowded with overlapping formulations used in mRNA vaccines and gene therapies.

Patent filing trends

  • Rapid increase in filings from 2015 onward corresponds with advances in mRNA technology.
  • Several new patents focus on targeting ligands, novel lipids, and scalable manufacturing.

What are the potential challenges to US 10,195,266's validity?

  • Prior Art Search: Numerous publications and granted patents describe lipid nanoparticles with similar compositions and methods.
  • Obviousness: The combination of known lipids and surface modifications may be deemed obvious to practitioners familiar with nucleic acid delivery.
  • Novelty: The specific ratios and surface modifications may lack novelty if similar prior art exists.

What legal or commercial implications stem from this patent?

  • The patent's claims, if upheld, provide significant control over specific lipid nanoparticle formulations for nucleic acid delivery.
  • Companies developing competing technologies must navigate around the composition and method claims, possibly by altering lipid ratios or surface strategies.
  • The patent avoidance landscape will likely focus on formulations with different lipid components, alternative manufacturing methods, or unclaimed surface modifications.

Summary of key points:

  • US 10,195,266 protects specific lipid nanoparticle compositions and associated manufacturing methods.
  • The patent’s claims are moderately broad but may face validity challenges based on prior art.
  • The patent landscape is densely populated with overlapping filings, especially from Moderna, Pfizer, and other biotech firms.
  • The formulation specifics, such as lipid ratios and surface modifications, are critical to enforceability.
  • Strategic patent navigation involves designing around the claims by varying component ratios, lipid types, and target modifications.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent protects a targeted lipid nanoparticle delivery platform with specific lipid compositions and manufacturing processes.
  • Its scope may be challenged due to prior art and overlapping patents.
  • Competitors should focus on alternative lipid mixtures, novel surface modifications, or different manufacturing techniques to circumvent the patent.
  • The landscape continues to evolve with increased filings for mRNA and nucleic acid delivery systems.

FAQs

Q1: Can the claims of US 10,195,266 be invalidated by prior art?
Yes. Existing publications and patents disclose similar lipid formulations, and the patent’s broad claims may be challenged on grounds of lack of novelty and obviousness.

Q2: What are the main components of the lipid nanoparticles claimed?
Cationic lipids, phospholipids, cholesterol, and PEGylated lipids, with specific weight ratios and surface modifications.

Q3: How do manufacturing methods influence patent scope?
Claims covering microfluidic preparation methods can be critical for enforcement, but alternative methods may circumvent such claims.

Q4: Which companies are most impacted by this patent?
Companies developing nucleic acid therapeutics utilizing similar lipid compositions, including Moderna, Pfizer, and emerging biotech firms.

Q5: What future patent strategies are advisable?
Innovators should seek formulations with different lipid components, surface targeting, or alternative manufacturing to dilute the scope of US 10,195,266.


References

  1. [1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2019). US Patent 10,195,266. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US10195266B2

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,195,266

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.