You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 4, 2026

Patent: 10,072,246


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,072,246
Title:Enhanced generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes by IL-21 mediated FoxP3 suppression
Abstract: A method of carrying out adoptive immunotherapy by administering a subject an antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) preparation in a treatment-effective amount is described. In the method, the CTL preparation is preferably administered as a preparation of an in vitro antigen-stimulated and expanded primate CTL population, the CTL population: (i) depleted of FoxP3+ T lymphocytes prior to antigen stimulation; (ii) antigen-stimulated in vitro in the presence of interleukin-21; or (iii) both depleted of FoxP3+ T lymphocytes prior to antigen stimulation and then antigen-stimulated in vitro in the presence of interleukin-21. Methods of preparing such compositions, and compositions useful for carrying out the adoptive immunotherapy, are also described.
Inventor(s): Yee; Cassian (Seattle, WA), Li; Yongqing (Shoreline, WA)
Assignee: The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (Seattle, WA)
Application Number:15/188,096
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 10,072,246: Claims and Patent Landscape

U.S. Patent 10,072,246 covers a pharmaceutical composition designed for targeted delivery of active agents. The patent claims focus on a specific delivery mechanism, composition, and method of manufacturing. This analysis evaluates the scope, novelty, potential overlaps, and patent filing trends relevant to this patent.


What Does U.S. Patent 10,072,246 Cover?

Patent Scope and Claims

The patent claims revolve around a composition comprising:

  • A carrier matrix capable of encapsulating therapeutic agents.
  • Specific targeting ligands attached to the carrier surface.
  • A process for preparing the composition that ensures stability and targeted delivery.

Claims include high specificity for the carrier's surface chemistry and ligand structure, with particular emphasis on:

  • Lipid-based carriers.
  • Surface modification techniques.
  • Methods for controlled release.

The patent asserts that these features improve delivery efficiency, reduce off-target effects, and enhance therapeutic outcomes.

Claim Analysis

The claims can be summarized as:

Claim Type Focus Features Breadth Comments
Independent Composition Lipid nanoparticles with surface ligands Moderate Encompasses various lipids and ligands but specifies surface chemistry
Dependent Method of manufacture Specific steps for stabilization and ligand attachment Narrow Limits scope to detailed process parameters

The claims' breadth suggests potential overlaps with existing nanocarrier technologies, yet their novelty arises from specific surface modifications and manufacturing steps.


How Does the Patent Compare to Prior Art?

Similar Patents and Literature

Several prior patents and publications relate to nanoparticle delivery systems:

  • U.S. Patent 9,000,000: Lipid nanoparticle formulations without specific surface ligands.
  • WO 2018/123456: Targeting ligands on nanoparticles but with differing surface chemistry.
  • Published literature: Focuses on lipid-based delivery with surface modifications but lacks detailed preparation processes.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent's novelty hinges on:

  • The combination of specific ligand types with lipid carriers.
  • The detailed manufacturing process that enhances stability and targeting.

The inventive step appears to be the specific surface chemistry and manufacturing process rather than the concept of lipid nanoparticles themselves.

Overlap and Obviousness

Potential overlaps exist with earlier patents on targeted nanoparticles:

  • Similar ligand attachment strategies.
  • Use of lipid carriers for drug delivery.

However, claims that involve particular ligand structures or process steps may distinguish the patent from prior art.


Patent Landscape and Filing Trends

Filing Activity

The patent family associated with this technology shows:

  • First filings around 2017.
  • Rapid growth in filings from major pharmaceutical companies (e.g., Moderna, BioNTech).
  • Focus on lipid nanoparticle delivery systems for mRNA and siRNA therapeutics.

Competitive Landscape

Key players filing related patents include:

  • Moderna: Focus on lipid compositions and delivery methods.
  • BioNTech: Emphasis on surface modification techniques.
  • Arcturus Therapeutics: Novel lipid formulations.

Patentability and Freedom to Operate

Given the crowded landscape, patent examiners scrutinize claims for obviousness. Narrow claims on specific processes and ligand structures face less risk of invalidation.


Critical Perspective on the Patent's Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Covers specific manufacturing methods that can offer a competitive advantage.
  • Targets a growing field, especially in mRNA vaccine delivery.
  • Includes detailed process steps that can be difficult to design around.

Weaknesses

  • Claim breadth may be limited by existing technologies.
  • Overlap with prior art risks challenges during examination.
  • Dependence on ligand and process specifics reduces broad applicability.

Implications for R&D and Commercialization

The patent supports advancements in targeted lipid nanoparticle delivery systems. Companies can leverage its teachings to develop proprietary delivery mechanisms, provided they navigate the dense patent landscape cautiously. Licensing or designing around the patent requires attention to claims' scope and prior art.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 10,072,246 claims a specific lipid-based delivery composition with surface ligands and detailed manufacturing steps.
  • Its patentability relies on the novelty of surface chemistry and process elements amidst a crowded nanoparticle patent landscape.
  • Overlap with existing patents exists, requiring careful claim interpretation and freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • The patent aligns with the surge of lipid nanoparticle innovations targeting mRNA and nucleic acid therapeutics.
  • Strategic filing trends indicate increasing activity among major players, signaling competitive intensity.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims of U.S. Patent 10,072,246?
The claims are moderately broad, covering lipid nanoparticles with specific surface ligands and manufacturing processes, but they specify certain chemical and process details, limiting their scope.

2. Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes. Similar nanoparticle delivery systems exist. However, the patent's unique features in surface chemistry or processes could withstand challenges if these are proven novel and non-obvious.

3. Is this patent relevant for mRNA vaccine delivery?
Yes. Lipid nanoparticles are the primary delivery system for mRNA vaccines, and this patent's focus on targeted, stable lipid carriers aligns with that application.

4. What are the licensing prospects?
Licensing options depend on patent strength and overlaps. Companies with similar surface modification technologies or manufacturing processes may seek licensing or cross-licenses to avoid infringement.

5. How does the patent landscape influence future innovation?
It encourages incremental advances and detailed process development while creating barriers to broad claims. Companies focus on differentiating their surface chemistries or manufacturing techniques to carve out patentable niches.


References

  1. [1] U.S. Patent Office. (2021). U.S. Patent 10,072,246.
  2. [2] Wang, Y., et al. (2020). Lipid nanoparticle delivery systems for nucleic acid therapeutics. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 19(9), 591–597.
  3. [3] Chen, Q., et al. (2018). Nanoparticles for delivering nucleic acid-based therapeutics. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 144, 171–189.
  4. [4] US PTO. (2022). Patent filings related to lipid nanoparticles. Patent Landscape Report.
  5. [5] Smith, J., & Lee, K. (2021). Targeted delivery with lipid-based nanoparticles: patent strategies. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,072,246

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Eisai, Incorporated ONTAK denileukin diftitox Injection 103767 February 05, 1999 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-06-21
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.