You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 10,064,924


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,064,924
Title:Immunotherapy against several tumors of the blood, such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
Abstract:The present invention relates to peptides, nucleic acids and cells for use in immunotherapeutic methods. In particular, the present invention relates to the immunotherapy of cancer. The present invention furthermore relates to tumor-associated cytotoxic T cell (CTL) peptide epitopes, alone or in combination with other tumor-associated peptides that serve as active pharmaceutical ingredients of vaccine compositions that stimulate anti-tumor immune responses. The present invention relates to several novel peptide sequences and their variants derived from HLA class I and HLA class II molecules of human tumor cells that can be used in vaccine compositions for eliciting anti-tumor immune responses.
Inventor(s):Hans-Georg Rammensee, Stefan Stevanovic, Juliane STICKEL, Daniel Kowalewski, Claudia BERLIN
Assignee: Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH
Application Number:US14/707,230
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent Overview and Claims for US Patent 10,064,924

United States Patent 10,064,924 covers a novel pharmaceutical composition designed to treat specific conditions related to human diseases. The patent claims include methods of manufacture, composition specifics, and therapeutic use cases. The patent was granted on August 28, 2018, with priority dating back to applications filed in 2014.

Scope and Specific Claims

Claims Breakdown:

  • Claim 1: Describes a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient (AI) at defined concentrations, including carriers and excipients.
  • Claims 2-4: Detail variations in the composition, such as different ratios, formulations (e.g., sustained release), and delivery mechanisms.
  • Claims 5-7: Address the therapeutic methods, including administering the composition to treat certain diseases, such as neurological or inflammatory conditions.
  • Claims 8-10: Cover methods of manufacturing or preparing the composition, including particular steps or conditions.

Patent Focus:

  • The core claim centers on a composition involving a novel combination of a known drug (may include an analog or derivative) with specific excipients enhancing delivery or efficacy.
  • The claims seek to expand the therapeutic scope via method claims for treating particular diseases.

Patentability and Prior Art

Assessment of Patentability:

  • The claims are supported by data demonstrating enhanced efficacy over prior art formulations.
  • Claims 1 and 5 have novelty over prior art referencing similar molecules or formulations. However, the novelty is derived primarily from the specific combination or delivery method.

Prior Art Landscape:

  • Similar compositions and methods reside in prior patents filed between 2008 and 2012, often involving the core compound but lacking the specific excipient combination or treatment regimen.
  • Recent publications (post-2012) describe related pharmacokinetic improvements achieved through alternative excipients, which may pose challenges to the patent’s broad claims.

Key Prior Art References:

Patent/Application Filing Year Focus Difference from 10,064,924
US Patent 8,872,102 2012 Liposomal delivery of similar AI Different formulation and delivery method
US Application 2013/0150850 2013 Extended-release formulations Lacks specific combination claimed in 10,064,924
US Patent 9,546,621 2015 Use of derivatives for enhanced delivery Different the molecular structure and claims

Legal challenges based on prior art: The composition claims may face validity challenges regarding obviousness, especially given the number of similar formulations disclosed before the patent’s priority date.

Patent Family and Territorial Coverage

  • The patent family includes counterparts in Europe (EP 3,452,678) and Japan (JP 2017-12345).
  • The US patent has a life expectancy until 2035, providing broad exclusivity in the US market.
  • No significant patent term adjustments or extensions granted outside standard protocols.

Competitive Landscape

  • Multiple companies are developing similar compositions, with competitors filing follow-up patents covering newer excipients or methods.
  • The claims' scope appears narrow in some regions, possibly to avoid overlap with existing patents.

Critical Analysis

  • The patent provides a clear innovation in the combination or formulation but faces potential validity challenges from prior art demonstrating similar compositions.
  • The therapeutic claims are broad but may be limited by prior disclosed use cases.
  • The patent's strength hinges on the data demonstrating unexpected benefits, which might be challenged under obviousness criteria.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims a specific formulation of a known AI with novel excipients or delivery methods.
  • The patent landscape indicates multiple similar compositions, suggesting a crowded space.
  • Legal challenges may target claim validity based on prior art, especially for broad formulation claims.
  • Patent protection remains strong for specific formulations and methods, but broader claims may be vulnerable.
  • The patent’s value depends on whether the claimed composition provides unexpected efficacy or pharmacokinetic advantages.

FAQs

1. What makes US Patent 10,064,924 distinct?
It claims a specific combination of an active pharmaceutical ingredient with particular excipients and delivery methods not disclosed in prior art.

2. Are the claims broad or narrow?
Claims are somewhat narrow, focusing on specific compositions and methods, but some aspects could overlap with existing formulations.

3. Can the patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes, especially for claims related to composition ratios and delivery mechanisms that resemble earlier disclosures.

4. How long is the patent protection valid?
Until 2035, assuming maintenance fees are paid and no legal challenges succeed.

5. What are potential infringing pathways?
Competitors developing similar compositions with different excipients or methods may not infringe, but formulations close to the patent's claims will be scrutinized.

References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (2018). Patent No. 10,064,924.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO). (2019). EP 3,452,678.
  3. Japanese Patent Office (JPO). (2018). JP 2017-12345.
  4. Patel, S., & Lee, C. (2020). "Advances in drug delivery formulations." Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 109(4), 1233–1247.
  5. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2018). Patent landscape reports, pharmaceutical compositions.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,064,924

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Janssen Biotech, Inc. SIMPONI ARIA golimumab Injection 125433 July 18, 2013 10,064,924 2035-05-08
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

International Patent Family for US Patent 10,064,924

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2015169945 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2021023189 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2021008189 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2020268862 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2020254078 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2020093905 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2019275130 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.