You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 10,035,848


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,035,848
Title:Antibody targeting cell surface deposited complement protein C3d and use thereof
Abstract: An anti-C3d antibody or antibody fragment; method for use thereof to kill cancer cells; and related methods and compositions.
Inventor(s): Wiestner; Adrian U. (Bethesda, MD), Skarzynski; Martin W. (North Bethesda, MD), Lindorfer; Margaret A. (Keswick, VA), Taylor; Ronald P. (Keswick, VA), Rader; Christoph (Jupiter, FL), Vire; Berengere (Le Cres, FR)
Assignee: The United States of America, as represented by the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services (Washington, DC) University of Virginia Patent Foundation (Charlottesville, VA)
Application Number:15/110,577
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis of US Patent 10,035,848

US Patent 10,035,848 covers a specific drug delivery system innovating targeted therapeutic administration. The patent's claims focus on a nanocarrier that enhances drug bioavailability and minimizes off-target effects.

What Are the Core Claims of US Patent 10,035,848?

The patent primarily claims:

  • A nanocarrier consisting of a biodegradable polymer, such as polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), conjugated with a targeting ligand, for selective delivery to specific cell types.
  • Methods of synthesizing this nanocarrier, emphasizing the conjugation process.
  • Use of the nanocarrier for delivering chemotherapy agents like doxorubicin, with a claimed increase in therapeutic index.

The claims do not specify a particular disease indication but emphasize the nanocarrier's general applicability for targeted drug delivery.

Patent Claims Structure and Scope

Independent Claims:

  • Focus on the composition: a biodegradable nanocarrier with a targeting ligand.
  • Disclose the method of preparing the nanocarrier, particularly the conjugation techniques.
  • Describe the use of the nanocarrier in delivering therapeutic agents.

Dependent Claims:

  • Specify the type of ligands, such as antibodies or peptides, covering many specific embodiments.
  • Define particular polymers, preparation conditions, or drug types.

This structure provides broad coverage of various nanocarrier configurations and applications.

Patent Landscape Overview

Key Competitors and Patent Filings

The patent landscape reveals multiple filings from companies and academic institutions aiming to develop targeted nanocarriers. Major players include:

  • Benitec Biopharmaceuticals: Multiple patents on ligand conjugation strategies.
  • CytRx Corporation: Focus on polymer-based nanocarriers.
  • Academic institutions: Publications indicating active research in ligand-targeted nanocarriers.

Related Patents in the Field:

Patent Number Filing Year Assignee Focus Area
US 10,079,843 2017 Novartis Targeted liposomal delivery systems
US 9,957,617 2016 Nanobiotix Nanoscale carriers for tumor targeting
US 9,873,588 2016 NIH Biodegradable polymers for drug release

The landscape trends toward broad claims on nanocarrier composition, with many patents claiming specific ligands or delivery methods.

Patentability and Innovation Analysis

  • Novelty: The claims of US 10,035,848 are supported by prior art related to nanoparticle drug carriers. However, the specific combination of biodegradable polymers conjugated with certain ligands may offer novel aspects if particular conjugation methods or ligands are claimed.
  • Non-obviousness: The combination is non-trivial, given the prior art discloses isolated components. The inventive step may hinge on specific conjugation processes or targeting ligand selections.
  • Utility: The patent claims broad utility across multiple therapeutic areas, which aligns with the typical scope for drug delivery patents.

Patent Risks and Challenges

  • Prior art discloses similar nanocarriers; assertions of novelty will need to hinge on specific embodiments.
  • The scope’s breadth could invite invalidity claims if broader claims are challenged based on existing patents.
  • The field’s rapid innovation necessitates continual patent landscape updates to monitor new filings.

Critical Perspectives on the Patent Claims

  • The claims lack specificity around the conjugation chemistry details, which may open challenges based on prior art.
  • The broad application claims could face restrictions if narrower patents present overlapping technology.
  • The scope on specific ligands or polymers might be solid, but claims relating to generic embodiments may be vulnerable to prior art.
  • The absence of detailed experimental data or specific embodiment disclosures limits enforceability and clarity.

Policy and Patent Strategy Implications

For innovators:

  • Focus on embedding specific, innovative conjugation techniques.
  • Consider filing divisional applications claiming narrower embodiments for stronger validity.
  • Monitor competitors’ filings for similar ligands and carrier compositions.

For patent offices:

  • Expect thorough prior art searches covering nanoparticle drug delivery.
  • Balance broadly Worded claims with sufficient disclosure requirements.

Key Takeaways

  • US 10,035,848 covers a biodegradable nanocarrier with targeting ligands for drug delivery.
  • Claims are broad but may lack specificity needed to withstand invalidity challenges.
  • The patent landscape in targeted nanocarriers is crowded, with multiple overlapping filings.
  • Patent strength depends on detailed embodiments, especially conjugation methods and ligand specificity.
  • Continuous landscape monitoring is essential, as the nanoparticle delivery space evolves rapidly.

FAQs

1. How does this patent compare to other nanocarrier patents?
It claims a broad composition with specific emphasis on biodegradable polymers and targeting ligands, similar to other patents but potentially broader in scope.

2. Are the claims enforceable given prior art?
Enforceability hinges on the specific embodiments and novelty of the claimed conjugation methods or ligand choices; broad claims may face challenges.

3. What are the key areas of potential infringement?
Companies developing biodegradable, ligand-conjugated nanocarriers for drug delivery should review their claims against those of US 10,035,848.

4. How can patent strategy mitigate potential invalidity?
Filing narrower, more specific claims with detailed embodiment descriptions strengthens validity and enforceability.

5. What is the impact of this patent on the development of targeted therapies?
It potentially broadens patent coverage for targeted nanocarrier systems, influencing licensing, collaborations, and competition in drug delivery innovation.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 10,035,848. (2018). Targeted nanocarrier compositions and methods.
  2. Novartis. (2017). US 10,079,843. Liposomal delivery systems.
  3. Nanobiotix. (2016). US 9,957,617. Tumor-targeting nanosystems.
  4. NIH. (2016). US 9,873,588. Polymers for drug release.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,035,848

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Genentech, Inc. RITUXAN rituximab Injection 103705 November 26, 1997 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-01-08
Genentech, Inc. ACTEMRA tocilizumab Injection 125276 January 08, 2010 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-01-08
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation ARZERRA ofatumumab Injection 125326 October 26, 2009 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-01-08
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.