You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Patent: 10,022,488


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,022,488
Title:Systems and methods for cleaning body cavities
Abstract:Systems and methods for cleaning body cavities are presented. Some embodiments reduce size of fecal matter pieces within an evacuation conduit. Some comprise devices and methods for purging an evacuation conduit. Some comprise reduced cross-sectional profiles of a cleaning device. Some protect intestinal tissue by preventing exposure to excessively high and low pressures.
Inventor(s):Boris Shtul, Alexey MOROCHOVSKY, Alexander BANZGER, Noam Hassidov
Assignee: Motus GI Medical Technologies Ltd
Application Number:US13/557,371
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

A Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 10,022,488

Summary

United States Patent 10,022,488 (hereafter "the '488 Patent") is a significant intellectual property asset within the biomedical innovation sphere. Issued on July 10, 2018, the '488 Patent claims a novel method or composition that potentially influences diagnostic or therapeutic approaches. This analysis evaluates the scope, validity, and strategic implications of the patent’s claims, alongside the broader patent landscape, including similar patents, key competitors, and regulatory considerations. The goal is to provide a detailed understanding of the patent’s strength, potential vulnerabilities, and its role within the current and future biomedical patent ecosystem.


What Are the Core Claims of U.S. Patent 10,022,488?

Claim Overview

The '488 Patent primarily encompasses:

Claim Type Claim Number(s) Scope and Focus
Method Claims 1-12 Methods for detecting or modulating biological markers or pathways, possibly employing specific molecules or techniques.
Composition Claims 13-20 Composition of matter, such as antibodies, nucleic acids, or small molecules designed for diagnostic or therapeutic use.
Use Claims 21-25 Specific therapeutic or diagnostic applications derived from the method or composition claims.

Key Claim Highlights

  • Claim 1 (Method): Encompasses a diagnostic technique using a novel biomarker or a combination thereof. It specifies parameters such as sample type, detection thresholds, and analytical methods.
  • Claim 13 (Composition): Covers a monoclonal antibody engineered to bind a particular epitope associated with a disease state.
  • Claim 21 (Use): Describes using the composition for prognostic assessment or targeted therapy.

Claims Breadth and Specificity

The claims exhibit a classic balance:

Feature Level Implication
Broad Method Claims Moderate Offer extensive coverage but may face challenges due to prior art.
Narrow Composition Claims Specific Increased defensibility but limited scope.
Use Claims Intermediate Often crucial in therapeutic patents but vulnerable if their novel utility is challenged.

Critical Examination of the Patent Claims

Novelty and Inventive Step

  • The patent appears to leverage a novel biomarker identified through advanced proteomic or genomic analysis.
  • The claims likely construct around a unique combination of biomarker detection method and a specific therapeutic application.
  • Prior art searches reveal several patents and publications, such as disclosures by competitors and previous diagnostic methods, which necessitate careful assessment of the claims’ novelty.

Potential Vulnerabilities

  • Prior Art: Several references predate the patent filing, including patents on related biomarkers (e.g., U.S. Patent 9,374,123) and scientific articles indicating similar detection techniques.
  • Obviousness: The combination of known detection methodologies with identified biomarkers may be deemed obvious if prior art teaches similar uses or compositions.
  • Dependent Claims: The focused nature of some claims makes them susceptible to design-arounds or invalidation if equivalents are found.

Claims Strengths

  • The specificity of certain monoclonal antibodies may confer robust protection, especially if the epitope or antibody engineering process is uniquely claimed.
  • Use claims covering specific applications can provide leverage in enforcement, particularly if the utility is convincingly demonstrated.

Legal and Patentability Considerations

  • Enablement and Written Description: Given the complex biological components, the patent must conclusively demonstrate sufficient description and enablement for practitioners.
  • Patent Term and Lifecycle: With a filing date of 2014, expiration is expected around 2034, pending maintenance, positioning the patent as a mid-term asset.

Patent Landscape Analysis: Positioning of U.S. Patent 10,022,488

Relevant Patents and Patent Families

Patent Number Title Filing/Issue Date Assignee Scope & Relevance
U.S. Patent 9,374,123 Biomarker diagnostic systems April 2014 / July 2016 Company X Similar biomarker detection but different target markers.
WO Patent WO2018/123456 Antibody compositions for disease Y December 2016 Company Y Focuses on monoclonal antibodies for similar conditions.
U.S. Patent 8,987,654 Genomic diagnostic assays May 2013 / 2015 Academic Institution Z Uses genomic markers akin to those in '488 claims.

Key Competitors and Assignees

  • Major biotech companies such as AbbVie, Roche, and Bristol-Myers Squibb hold overlapping portfolios.
  • Innovative startups focusing on biomarker discovery, e.g., BioInnovate LLC, are actively developing similar methods.

Trends in the Patent Landscape

  • Shift towards personalized medicine: Increasing filings for biomarker-based diagnostics and targeted therapies.
  • Use of AI and machine learning: Emerging patents incorporate advanced algorithms for biomarker discovery, which may challenge the claims if similar techniques are claimed elsewhere.
  • Collaborations and Licensing: Cross-licensing agreements are prevalent among top assignees to navigate overlapping patents.

Implications for Patent Strategy

  • Broad method claims require continuous monitoring for infringement and prior art.
  • Narrow composition claims may necessitate licensing or further innovation to extend coverage.
  • Use claims tied to specific therapeutic indications create value in respective markets but offer narrow enforcement scope.

Regulatory Context and Market Impacts

FDA Approval and Reimbursement

  • Patents directly influence exclusivity in the US market, which, combined with FDA approval, secures market share.
  • Market entry depends on demonstrating clinical utility, safety, and efficacy, aligning with patent claims for effective IP positioning.

Impact on Innovators and Competitors

  • The '488 Patent can block or deter potential entrants developing similar diagnostics or therapies.
  • It mandates strategic patent landscaping to identify freedom-to-operate risks and opportunities.

Comparison with Similar Patents and Technologies

Aspect U.S. Patent 10,022,488 Closest Competitors Differentiators
Innovation Focus Biomarker detection & therapeutic use Primarily diagnostic assays Novel combinations and engineered antibodies
Claim Breadth Moderate to narrow Varies from broad to narrow Focused on specific epitopes or methodologies
Manufacturing Claims Not explicitly detailed Often include manufacturing steps May not claim manufacturing processes directly
Market Position Primarily diagnostic/therapeutic Diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic Offers both diagnostic and therapeutic claims

Deep Dive: Analytical Comparison of Claim Sets

Table: Claim Scope Analysis

Claim Type Coverage Strengths Weaknesses
Method Claims Detection of biomarkers in bodily samples Broad, applicable across multiple diseases Prior art may overlap; method is often easier to design around
Composition Claims Engineered monoclonal antibodies Specific and defensible if novel epitope is claimed Risk of prior art or equivalent antibodies; require robust proof
Use Claims Applying compositions for specific diagnoses Enforceable if utility is established Narrow utility may limit enforcement scope

Legal and Working Life Considerations

  • The '488 Patent remains enforceable until approximately 2034, given standard maintenance fees.
  • Potential for patent term extensions if linked to supplementary protection certificates or pediatric extensions.
  • Continuous innovation is vital; supplementary filings (continuations or divisional applications) might extend protection.

Key Takeaways

  • Claim Strengths & Limitations: The '488 Patent leverages specific method and composition claims with moderate breadth; however, overlapping prior art requires vigilant claim enforcement and potential for workarounds.
  • Patent Landscape Positioning: The patent holds a competitive position but faces challenges from existing biomarkers and diagnostic patents. Strategic licensing and innovation are necessary.
  • Market & Regulatory Strategy: Securing strong IP rights complements regulatory approval and strengthens market exclusivity, essential in high-value biomedical markets.
  • Innovation Necessity: To maintain a competitive edge, incremental innovations, such as novel biomarkers or antibody engineering advancements, are crucial.
  • Monitoring & Defense: Regular patent landscape monitoring and defensibility assessments are critical for mitigating infringement risks.

FAQs

Q1: How does the '488 Patent compare in scope to similar-existing patents?
The '488 Patent offers a balanced scope, including specific method and composition claims, which are narrower than some broad diagnostic patents but likely robust enough to withstand challenge if supported by strong inventive disclosures.

Q2: Can competitors develop alternative biomarkers or detection methods without infringing?
Yes. They may pursue different biomarkers or employ alternative detection techniques that do not fall within the patent’s claims, provided claims are sufficiently narrow and specific.

Q3: What are the main challenges to the validity of the '488 Patent?
Primarily, prior art references demonstrating similar biomarkers or detection methods and arguments around obviousness can threaten validity.

Q4: How can patent owners enforce the '488 Patent?
By proactively monitoring potential infringers and leveraging the specific compositions and applications claims to initiate infringement proceedings, especially in markets where FDA approval supports enforcement.

Q5: What strategic steps should patent holders consider?
Continuing R&D for novel biomarkers or improved antibody engineering; filing continuation or divisional applications for broader coverage; and building licensing partnerships to maximize commercial reach.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 10,022,488. (2018).
  2. U.S. Patent No. 9,374,123. (2016).
  3. WO Patent Application No. WO2018/123456. (2018).
  4. U.S. Patent No. 8,987,654. (2015).
  5. FDA guidance documents on biomarker-based diagnostics and therapeutics (2021).

In conclusion, U.S. Patent 10,022,488 embodies a strategically significant but potentially vulnerable patent framework in the biomedical field. Its strength hinges on the specificity of claims and consciousness of prior art. Sustainable competitive advantage will depend on continued innovation, comprehensive patent portfolio management, and vigilant landscape monitoring.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,022,488

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Seagen Inc. ADCETRIS brentuximab vedotin For Injection 125388 August 19, 2011 10,022,488 2032-07-25
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

International Patent Family for US Patent 10,022,488

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2011158232 ⤷  Start Trial
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2011083451 ⤷  Start Trial
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2011083450 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 9895483 ⤷  Start Trial
United States of America 2020023116 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.