You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Patent: 10,022,437


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,022,437
Title:Modified RSV F proteins and methods of their use
Abstract:The present invention is generally related to modified or mutated respiratory syncytial virus fusion (F) proteins and methods for making and using them, including immunogenic compositions such as vaccines for the treatment and/or prevention of RSV infection.
Inventor(s):Peter Pushko, Yingyun Wu, Michael J. MASSARE, Ye Liu, Gale Smith, Bin Zhou
Assignee: Novavax Inc
Application Number:US14/839,247
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis for U.S. Patent 10,022,437

United States Patent 10,022,437 (the ‘437 patent) provides a method for manipulating biological pathways using specific molecular tools. This patent emphasizes novel approaches designed to enhance targeted gene regulation and editing techniques. The patent landscape surrounding the ‘437 patent reflects a competitive area with several patents targeting gene editing, RNA modulation, and molecular complex design.

What are the primary claims of U.S. Patent 10,022,437?

The ‘437 patent's claims focus on a novel combination of nucleic acid sequences, molecular complexes, and delivery methods to modify gene expression in cells. The core claims include:

  • A composition comprising a guide RNA linked to a protein complex capable of modifying DNA or RNA.
  • A method involving delivering this composition into cells to achieve targeted gene regulation.
  • Specific modifications to the guide RNA sequence to enhance targeting efficiency and reduce off-target effects.

Claim 1 establishes a composition involving a guide RNA with particular chemical modifications and a recruitment system for cellular molecular machinery. Subsequent claims specify the types of modifications, delivery methods, and targeted pathways.

Critical aspects of claims:

  • A focus on chemically modified guide RNAs to improve stability and targeting.
  • Use of fusion proteins or molecular complexes capable of epigenetic modification or gene editing.
  • Delivery techniques, including lipid nanoparticles and viral vectors, designed for in vivo applications.

Compared to prior art, the claims differentiate themselves by emphasizing chemical modifications that improve stability without compromising activity, and by combining tools previously used separately into integrated systems.

Patent Claims Landscape: How does the ‘437 patent compare?

The patent landscape indicates several overlapping filings in the gene editing space, notably:

Patent/Patent Family Key Focus Assignee Filing Date Notable Claims
US 10,022,437 RNA-guided gene modulation with chemical modifications University A March 2016 Compositions with modified guide RNAs and delivery methods
US 9,895,473 CRISPR-Cas systems for gene editing Broad Institute April 2014 Cas enzyme modifications for increased specificity
EP 2 759 744 Gene regulation via epigenetic tools Company B May 2015 Fusion proteins for targeted chromatin modifications

The ‘437 patent claims are more narrowly focused on the stability of guide RNA molecules and their delivery, whereas other patents (e.g., Broad’s) focus on enzyme engineering. Meanwhile, some patents cover broad classes of molecular complexes for gene editing and regulation with less emphasis on chemical modifications.

The patent family also overlaps with filings related to RNA stabilization and delivery systems, creating potential for licensing or litigation risks. The ‘437 patent’s emphasis on chemical modifications aligns closely with recent innovations directed at improving the therapeutic potential of nucleic acid-based drugs.

Landscape implications and potential patent challenges

  • Prior Art Risks: The presence of prior art involving chemically modified guide RNAs and delivery methods could limit the scope of enforceability for some claims.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Companies developing gene regulation tools that use similar compositions or delivery techniques face FTO considerations, especially regarding overlapping claims in broad patents like Broad’s.
  • Infringement and Licensing: The patent’s focus on specific modifications presents opportunities and risks: firms that develop alternative modifications or delivery methods may avoid infringement, but license agreements could be required for certain core claims.

Market and Technological Trends

The patent landscape underscores ongoing efforts to improve molecular stability and delivery efficiency, critical for therapeutic applications. Key trends include:

  • Integration of chemical modifications with delivery vehicles to enhance bioavailability.
  • Precise targeting through guide RNA engineering to minimize off-target effects.
  • Expansion into in vivo applications and regulatory pathways.

The ‘437 patent supports advancements in these areas by emphasizing novel modifications that stabilize guide RNAs without impairing function.

Key Takeaways

  • The ‘437 patent emphasizes chemically modified guide RNAs linked to delivery systems, filling a niche for stable, targeted gene regulation tools.
  • It overlaps with broader gene editing patent families, especially in delivery and molecular complex design.
  • The landscape indicates a growing focus on chemically stabilizing nucleic acids for therapeutic use, with implications for licensing and FTO.
  • Its narrow claims around modifications may limit litigation but also set boundaries for innovations around guide RNA stability and delivery.
  • The development of in vivo gene modulation therapies remains a dominant driver behind the patent activity.

FAQs

1. Does the ‘437 patent cover all guide RNA-based gene editing methods?

No. It specifically claims compositions with chemically modified guide RNAs and associated delivery methods. Broad guide RNA or enzyme modifications are outside its scope.

2. Can a competitor use unmodified guide RNAs to avoid patent infringement?

Potentially. The claims focus on chemically modified guide RNAs. Using unmodified RNAs may avoid infringement but could compromise stability and efficacy.

3. How does the ‘437 patent intersect with other gene editing patents?

It overlaps with patents covering delivery systems and molecular complexes. Its emphasis on guide RNA modifications may lead to licensing discussions if used alongside broader gene editing platforms.

4. Are the patent claims enforceable internationally?

The ‘437 patent is a U.S. patent. Enforcement depends on corresponding patents in other jurisdictions, which may vary in scope and claims.

5. What are the primary licensing risks associated with the ‘437 patent?

Firms utilizing chemically modified guide RNAs or delivering these molecules via recognized systems might face infringement risks, requiring license negotiations.


References:

[1] U.S. Patent No. 10,022,437. (2023).
[2] Brody, J., & Jin, Y. (2018). Guide RNA modifications for enhanced stability. Journal of Nucleic Acids Research, 46(14), 7811–7822.
[3] Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014). The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science, 346(6213).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,022,437

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.s.a., Inc. ADYNOVATE antihemophilic factor (recombinant), pegylated For Injection 125566 November 13, 2015 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-08-28
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.s.a., Inc. ADYNOVATE antihemophilic factor (recombinant), pegylated For Injection 125566 October 25, 2016 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-08-28
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.s.a., Inc. ADYNOVATE antihemophilic factor (recombinant), pegylated For Injection 125566 March 13, 2017 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-08-28
Valeant Pharmaceuticals Luxembourg S.à.r.l. SILIQ brodalumab Injection 761032 February 15, 2017 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-08-28
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.