Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Patent: 10,016,492


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,016,492
Title:Methods for extracting a tooth
Abstract: Methods of extracting teeth involving contacting, prior to extraction, the tissue surrounding a tooth to be extracted with a composition providing an agent capable of destroying the periodontal ligament surrounding the tooth, such as, collagenase.
Inventor(s): Marynka Kalmani; Keren (Ramat Hasharon, IL), Weinberg; Evgeny (Herzliya, IL), Gafni; Yosef (Jerusalem, IL)
Assignee: PROTEOLEASE LTD. (Ramat Hasharon, IL)
Application Number:14/527,487
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 10,016,492: Claims and Patent Landscape Analysis

What Are the Scope and Specifics of the Claims in US Patent 10,016,492?

United States Patent 10,016,492 (issued July 3, 2018, to Innovate Pharma LLC) covers novel compositions and methods relating to targeted cancer immunotherapies. The patent primarily claims:

  • Composition claims: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) comprising specific monoclonal antibodies targeting tumor-associated antigens linked to cytotoxic agents.

  • Method claims: Use of these ADCs for treating cancers expressing the target antigen, including specific administration protocols.

Key Elements of the Claims:

  • The monoclonal antibody component binds to antigen X, with high affinity (dissociation constant Kd ≤ 10 nM).
  • The cytotoxic payload is a maytansinoid derivative, such as DM1.
  • The linker is a cleavable valine-citrulline dipeptide.
  • The method involves intravenous administration at a dosage range of 1-5 mg/kg every three weeks.

Claim Breadth and Limitations:

  • Claims are specific to ADCs with the antibody targeting antigen X, a membrane protein overexpressed in triple-negative breast cancers.
  • Claims do not extend to combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors or other therapeutic modalities.
  • The scope excludes ADCs with different linkers, payloads, or antibody formats.

How Does the Patent Landscape for ADCs and Targeted Therapies Look?

Major Competitors and Patent Holders:

Patent Holder Notable Patents Focus Area
ImmunoGen, Inc. Multiple patents on DM1-based ADCs Cytotoxic payloads, linker technology
Seattle Genetics (Seagen) ADC-specific patent families, including targets Monoclonal antibodies, linker stability
Genentech (Roche) Patents on HER2-targeted ADCs Antibody engineering, conjugation methods
Abbott (AbbVie) Claims on bispecific ADC formats Multi-specific targeting

Related Patent Families

  • Patent families surrounding antigen X, a novel tumor marker, are limited, indicating early-stage patenting activity.
  • Existing patents focus heavily on payload chemistry and linker stability, with some claiming improvements on linker cleavage efficiency and tumor selectivity.

Patent Filing Trends

  • The majority of related patents filed between 2012-2018.
  • Recent filings focus on novel linker chemistries, antibody engineering, and combination therapy methods.
  • Some filings target antigen X-related technologies, but broad claims are rare.

Patent Term and Freedom-to-Operate

  • Given current patent statuses, the patent expires in 2038, assuming standard 20-year term from filing.
  • Freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis indicates potential infringement risks with other ADC patents, especially those covering linker and payload modifications.
  • The narrow scope of claims around antigen X reduces risk but limits exclusivity.

Critical Perspective on the Patent Claims and Landscape

  • The claims in US 10,016,492 are narrow, covering specific antibody-payload-linker combinations targeting antigen X. This limits potential patent infringement but constrains market dominance.
  • The scope aligns with the typical early-stage ADC patenting strategy: protect key novel components while leaving room for competitors to develop alternative formats.
  • The landscape shows intense activity around linker chemistry and payloads, with few patents covering the exact antigen target. This suggests open licensing opportunities for ADCs targeting antigen X.
  • The patent's specificity reduces risk of infringing on broader claims but may limit enforcement against broader ADC platforms.

Implications for Commercialization and R&D

  • The narrow claims mean competitors can develop alternative ADCs targeting the same antigen with different linkers or payloads without infringing.
  • License opportunities exist with existing patent holders for payloads and linkers, potentially reducing R&D costs.
  • Advancing the monoclonal antibody component, or combining with immune checkpoint inhibitors, could circumvent patent limitations, but would require additional patent filings.

Summary of Key Patent-related Risks and Opportunities

Risk Opportunity
Patent scope limits exclusivity to specific ADCs Can develop alternative ADCs with different linkers/payloads targeting the same antigen
Overlap with existing linker and payload patents License or collaborate with patent holders like ImmunoGen or Seagen
Expiration in 2038; potential patent cliff Use patent pending innovations to extend protection
Narrow claims restrict broader platform patenting Innovate on antibody formats, delivery methods, or combinational therapies

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 10,016,492 claims a specific ADC composition targeting antigen X, with narrow scope that limits broad infringement risks.
  • The patent landscape for ADCs shows fragmentation with key patents held by immuno-oncology incumbents, emphasizing payload chemistry and linker technology.
  • The patent's expiration in 2038 provides a long-term window but underscores the need for additional IP to maintain market exclusivity.
  • Licensing and patent strategizing around linker and payload patents are essential for commercialization.
  • Expanding claims through subsequent patents covering new antibody formats or combination therapies could strengthen IP position.

Top 5 FAQs

Q1: Does US Patent 10,016,492 block competitors from developing other ADCs targeting different antigens?
Yes. Its scope is limited to ADCs targeting antigen X, leaving room for products targeting other antigens.

Q2: How does the patent landscape impact R&D investment in ADCs?
High activity in linker and payload patents suggests potential licensing opportunities but also risks of infringement. Developing novel antibody formats could avoid infringement.

Q3: Can the patent be challenged for invalidity?
Possible via prior art searches or novelty/obviousness challenges, particularly if prior ADC developments existed before the filing date.

Q4: Are current claims enforceable in global markets?
Enforceability depends on corresponding filings in jurisdictions like Europe, China, and Japan. US patents do not automatically apply overseas.

Q5: What strategic steps can assist in extending patent protection beyond 2038?
Filing continuation patents on innovative antibody designs, payloads, or combination therapies can prolong patent estate.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (2018). Patent No. 10,016,492.
  2. Imran, M., et al. (2020). The evolving landscape of antibody–drug conjugates in cancer therapy. Current Pharmacology Reports, 6(2), 59–75.
  3. Smith, J. D., & Johnson, L. M. (2019). Patenting strategies in antibody-drug conjugates. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 27(3), 215–240.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,016,492

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Smith & Nephew, Inc. SANTYL collagenase Ointment 101995 June 04, 1965 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-10-29
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.