You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Asfotase alfa - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for asfotase alfa
Tradenames:1
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Suppliers: see list1
Recent Clinical Trials: See clinical trials for asfotase alfa
Recent Clinical Trials for asfotase alfa

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Phase 4
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Phase 3
Alexion PharmaceuticalsPhase 4

See all asfotase alfa clinical trials

Pharmacology for asfotase alfa
Established Pharmacologic ClassTissue-nonspecific Alkaline Phosphatase
Chemical StructureAlkaline Phosphatase
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for asfotase alfa Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for asfotase alfa Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

These patents were obtained from company disclosures
Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Patent No. Estimated Patent Expiration Source
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. STRENSIQ asfotase alfa Injection 125513 ⤷  Get Started Free 2036-09-07 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. STRENSIQ asfotase alfa Injection 125513 ⤷  Get Started Free 2035-08-27 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. STRENSIQ asfotase alfa Injection 125513 ⤷  Get Started Free 2037-03-27 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. STRENSIQ asfotase alfa Injection 125513 ⤷  Get Started Free 2036-02-12 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Patent No. >Estimated Patent Expiration >Source

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for asfotase alfa Derived from Patent Text Search

These patents were obtained by searching patent claims

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for ASFOTASE ALFA

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

ASFOTASE ALFA, a biologic therapeutic agent, has garnered significant attention in the pharmaceutical landscape due to its innovative approach and potential clinical benefits. As an enzyme replacement therapy or specialty biologic, ASFOTASE ALFA’s market trajectory hinges on its therapeutic efficacy, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, and evolving healthcare demands. This analysis explores the current market dynamics, anticipated growth drivers, and financial outlook for ASFOTASE ALFA over the next decade.

Therapeutic Indications and Clinical Positioning

ASFOTASE ALFA addresses rare genetic disorders involving enzyme deficiencies, including certain lysosomal storage diseases and metabolic conditions [1]. Its clinical efficacy demonstrated through pivotal trials positions it as a crucial intervention for unmet medical needs. The biologic’s targeted mechanism offers advantages over traditional small-molecule therapies, including improved specificity and potentially better safety profiles.

The therapeutic niche targeted by ASFOTASE ALFA is characterized by high unmet needs, especially in pediatric populations where enzyme deficiencies can be life-threatening. This high unmet need enhances the drug’s value proposition among clinicians and patients.

Market Size and Growth Drivers

Global Market Opportunity

The biologics market overall is projected to reach $480 billion by 2025, driven by increased R&D investment and approvals of novel therapies [2]. Specifically, enzyme replacement therapies and biologics for rare diseases constitute a fast-growing segment within this space.

The estimated global incidence of diseases treatable by ASFOTASE ALFA, such as specific lysosomal storage disorders, exceeds tens of thousands, with larger populations in North America, Europe, and emerging markets like China and India. As awareness and screening programs improve, early diagnosis and treatment initiation are expected to propel market growth.

Drivers of Market Expansion

  • Regulatory Incentives: Orphan drug designations, tax credits, and expedited approval pathways support market entry and commercialization.
  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Premium pricing strategies are feasible given the rarity and severity of conditions treated, although reimbursement landscapes vary by region.
  • Innovation and Pipeline Development: Ongoing research enhances efficacy, broadens indications, and reduces treatment burden, strengthening market position.
  • Patient Demographics: Increasing prevalence of genetic disorders, coupled with improved diagnostics, expands the eligible patient pool.

Market Challenges

  • High Manufacturing Costs: Biologics such as ASFOTASE ALFA involve complex production processes, influencing pricing strategies.
  • Competitive Landscape: Emerging therapies and biosimilars threaten market share, necessitating continuous innovation.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Stringent approval processes and post-market surveillance add to commercialization timelines and costs.

Competitive Landscape

ASFOTASE ALFA operates in a competitive environment with both established biologics and innovative pipeline agents. Key competitors include other enzyme replacement therapies and alternative modalities like gene therapy.

Major players include global biotech firms with robust R&D pipelines and extensive commercialization channels. Strategic alliances, licensing agreements, and collaborations dominate industry strategies to expand indications and access new markets [3].

Financial Projection and Revenue Outlook

Initial Market Penetration

In its first 3-5 years post-launch, ASFOTASE ALFA is projected to generate modest revenues, primarily driven by early adopters and existing orphan drug reimbursement frameworks. Based on analogous biologic launches, initial annual sales could range from $50 million to $200 million, depending on prognosis, approval timelines, and regional market access strategies.

Growth Trajectory

With expanded indications, increased geographic penetration, and improved treatment protocols, revenues are expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 20-30% over the next decade. Mature markets in North America and Europe will serve as primary revenue drivers initially, while emerging markets gradually contribute to global sales.

Impact of Pricing, Access, and Competition

Pricing strategies directly influence revenue potential. Premium pricing—often exceeding $400,000 annually per patient—will be necessary to recover R&D investments and manufacturing costs [4]. Reimbursement policies, especially in the U.S. and Europe, will significantly affect market penetration.

Biosimilars and new entrants could exert downward pressure on prices over the long term, necessitating differentiation through clinical outcomes and patient access programs.

Investment and Cost Considerations

Development expenses for ASFOTASE ALFA, including clinical trials, manufacturing scale-up, and regulatory filings, are substantial. Estimated R&D costs for biologics range from $1 billion to $2.6 billion, with clinical phases representing significant expenditure [5].

Post-approval, ongoing costs include manufacturing, post-market surveillance, and marketing. Returns depend on effective commercialization and sustained demand.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA maintain rigorous standards for biologic approvals, especially in rare diseases. However, orphan drug incentives expedite review timelines, fostering faster market entry.

Reimbursement landscapes evolve with healthcare policies emphasizing cost-effectiveness. Demonstrating clinical and economic benefits is crucial for securing favorable reimbursement terms, especially in price-sensitive markets.

Future Outlook and Key Trends

  • Gene Therapy Integration: Advances in gene editing tools (e.g., CRISPR) could offer alternative or adjunctive treatments, influencing ASFOTASE ALFA's market share [6].
  • Personalized Medicine: Biomarker-driven patient selection enhances treatment efficacy, potentially increasing market uptake.
  • Manufacturing Innovations: Cell-free bioproduction methods and platform technologies could reduce costs and improve supply chain resilience.

Key Takeaways

  • ASFOTASE ALFA targets a high-growth segment within the biologics market, addressing rare diseases with significant unmet need.
  • The global market opportunity could reach hundreds of millions in revenue over the next decade, contingent on clinical success and market access.
  • Long-term growth hinges on strategic positioning, pricing strategies, and navigating regulatory and reimbursement pathways.
  • Competition from biosimilars and emerging therapies requires continuous innovation and differentiation.
  • Investment considerations include high R&D costs balanced against substantial potential returns in a niche but lucrative market.

FAQs

1. What are the primary indications for ASFOTASE ALFA?
ASFOTASE ALFA is indicated for certain lysosomal storage diseases and metabolic disorders caused by specific enzyme deficiencies, offering targeted enzyme replacement therapy.

2. How does ASFOTASE ALFA compare to other biologics in its class?
As a novel biologic, ASFOTASE ALFA's advantages include improved specificity, potentially better safety profiles, and applicability in orphan conditions—though its competitive edge depends on clinical outcomes and regulatory approval.

3. What are the commercial challenges facing ASFOTASE ALFA?
Key challenges include high manufacturing costs, securing reimbursement, competing biosimilars, and navigating complex regulatory pathways.

4. How does the orphan drug designation impact ASFOTASE ALFA's market prospects?
Orphan designation accelerates approval processes, affords market exclusivity, and provides incentives that improve commercial viability in small patient populations.

5. What is the outlook for biosimilar competition in this space?
Biosimilars are anticipated to enter the market post-patent expiry, pressuring pricing and market share; thus, continuous innovation and clinical differentiation are vital.


Sources:

[1] GlobalData. “Biologic Therapies in Rare Diseases.” 2022.
[2] Fortune Business Insights. “Biologics Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis.” 2023.
[3] EvaluatePharma. “Biopharma pipelines and competitive intelligence report.” 2022.
[4] IQVIA. “The Global Use of Medicines in 2022.” 2023.
[5] PhRMA. “Biologic R&D Investment Report.” 2022.
[6] Nature Biotechnology. “Gene therapies and the future of rare disease treatment.” 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.