You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 29, 2026

Drugs in ATC Class L01EB


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drugs in ATC Class: L01EB - Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Market Dynamics and Patent Landscape for ATC Class: L01EB – Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Last updated: January 6, 2026

Executive Summary

The ATC classification L01EB pertains to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This class has seen significant growth driven by the prevalence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other malignancies reliant on EGFR mutations. The market is dominated by key players such as AstraZeneca (Iressa), Roche (Tarceva), and newer entrants with third-generation agents like osimertinib. Patent exclusivity, clinical trial progress, and regulatory approvals shape market accessibility, while patent cliffs and biosimilar entry pose ongoing challenges. This report appraises current market dynamics, patent strategies, competitive landscape, and future outlooks.


1. Overview of ATC Class L01EB: EGFR TKIs

1.1 Definition and Scope

  • ATC Classification: L01EB
  • Pharmacological Group: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting EGFR
  • Indications: Primarily non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal, and other solid tumors
  • Key Drugs:
    • First-generation: Erlotinib (Tarceva), Gefitinib (Iressa)
    • Second-generation: Afatinib (Giotrif)
    • Third-generation: Osimertinib (Tagrisso), Lazertinib

1.2 Mechanism of Action

EGFR TKIs block the tyrosine kinase activity of EGFR, disrupting downstream signaling pathways that promote tumor proliferation and survival.


2. Market Size and Growth Drivers

2.1 Global Market Valuation (2022-2027)

Year Market Size (USD billion) CAGR (%) Notes
2022 8.5 Driven by NSCLC prevalence
2023 9.2 8.2 Increased adoption of third-gen agents
2024 10.1 9.8 Expanded indications
2025 11.2 10.9 Market expansion in Asia-Pacific
2026 12.4 10.7 Patent expiries impacting market share
2027 13.7 10.5 Introduction of biosimilars

2.2 Key Market Drivers

Driver Impact Details
Increasing NSCLC Incidence Significant Nearly 2.2 million new lung cancer cases globally (WHO, 2022)
Molecular Profiling Adoption Accelerates Precision medicine approaches facilitate targeted therapy use
Regulatory Approvals Expands indications Approvals for brain metastases, adjuvant use
Development of Novel Agents Competes Next-gen TKIs with improved efficacy and safety

2.3 Market Challenges

Challenge Impact Details
Patent Expiries Market share shift Patent cliffs for first- and second-generation drugs (e.g., Erlotinib, Gefitinib)
Resistance Mutations Clinical hurdles T790M and other resistance mutations limit durability
High Cost Accessibility issues Cost considerations affect adoption in emerging markets
Biosimilar Entry Market competition Biosimilars could reduce prices and margins

3. Patent Landscape and Intellectual Property

3.1 Patent Strategies and Filing Trends

Year Patent Filings Major Patent Holders Focus Areas
2010 50 AstraZeneca, Roche, OSI Pharmaceuticals Composition, method of use
2015 120 Emergence of third-generation agents Resistance management, combination therapies
2020 190 Expanding claims on next-gen EGFR TKIs Biomarkers, combination patents

Note: Patent filings peaked around 2015-2020, correlating with the development of third-generation EGFR TKIs.

3.2 Patent Expiry Timeline

Drug Patent Expiry Patent Number Key Patents Notes
Erlotinib 2024-2025 US7,550,268 Composition of matter Post-expiry, biosimilars enter
Gefitinib 2023-2024 US7,216,880 Use in NSCLC Patent cliff imminent
Osimertinib 2027 US9,821,556 Next-generation mutation targeting Still under patent protection

Insight: Patent expiries from 2023-2025 are pivotal periods for biosimilar competition.

3.3 Patent Litigation and Litigation Trends

  • Patent litigations dominate during patent expiry periods (e.g., erlotinib, gefitinib) with key legal battles over formulation and method of use.
  • Recent disputes involve biosimilar manufacturers challenging originator patents, potentially affecting market entry.

4. Competitive Landscape and Product Pipeline

4.1 Market Leaders and Their Strategies

Company Key Products Market Share (2022) Strategic Focus
AstraZeneca Tagrisso (Osimertinib) 37% First-line use, CNS penetration
Roche Tarceva (Erlotinib) 21% Combo therapies, older indications
Boehringer Ingelheim Afatinib 10% Resistance mitigation
Others Lazertinib Emerging Next-gen opportunities

4.2 Innovative Pipeline Products

  • Lazertinib (Lyntad, 2021 NDA submission; South Korea approval): third-generation TKI targeting T790M mutations with improved safety.
  • Allo-specific TKIs: exploring combination with immunotherapies.
  • Combination therapies: EGFR TKIs with anti-angiogenic agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors.

4.3 R&D Focus

Focus Area Rationale Leading Companies
Overcoming Resistance Mutations (T790M) AstraZeneca, Janssen
CNS Penetration Brain metastases Daiichi Sankyo, Clovis Oncology
Biomarker Development Precise patient selection Pfizer, Roche

5. Regulatory Policies and Approvals

Region Regulatory Agency Recent Approvals Notes
US FDA Osimertinib (2015), Lazertinib (2022) Fast track and priority review pathways used
EU EMA Same as FDA Orphan drug designations for specific indications
Japan PMDA Multiple approvals Emphasis on TKI use in clinical guidelines

5.1 Regulatory Trends

  • Increasing approval of second- and third-generation EGFR TKIs for various lines of therapy.
  • Accelerated approval pathways employed during COVID-19 for expedited access.
  • Post-marketing commitments focus on resistance and CNS penetration.

6. Future Outlook

6.1 Market Projections

By 2027, the EGFR TKI market is anticipated to reach USD 13.7 billion, driven by:

  • Rising global lung cancer burden
  • Expanding indications
  • Emergence of biosimilars post-patent expiry

6.2 Innovation and Disruption Potential

Disruptor Impact Status
Biosimilar Entrants Lower prices, increased access In development, pending approvals
Combination Therapies Improved PFS, OS Clinical trials ongoing
Resistance Modulating Agents Extend TKI efficacy R&D underway

6.3 Key Factors Influencing Future Growth

  • Speed and breadth of regulatory approvals
  • Success of next-generation inhibitors
  • Market adoption of combination therapies
  • Patent litigation outcomes

7. Comparative Analysis: First, Second, and Third-Generation EGFR TKIs

Criterion First-generation Second-generation Third-generation
Examples Erlotinib, Gefitinib Afatinib Osimertinib
Spectrum EGFR mutations EGFR + resistant mutations T790M mutation, CNS penetration
Resistance Common Resistant mutations Delayed resistance
Main Limitations Resistance, CNS Toxicity, resistance Cost

8. FAQs

Q1: How do patent expiries influence market dynamics in ATC Class L01EB?
Patent expiries open the market for biosimilars and generics, leading to price competition and increased access, but also threaten revenue streams for innovator companies.

Q2: What are the principal resistance mechanisms to EGFR TKIs?
The T790M mutation in EGFR is the most common resistance mechanism, leading to reduced drug efficacy, prompting the development of third-generation TKIs like osimertinib targeted at T790M.

Q3: Which regions are emerging markets for EGFR TKIs?
Asia-Pacific, particularly China, Japan, and South Korea, are rapidly growing markets due to higher NSCLC incidence and government support for innovative therapies.

Q4: How does the patent landscape affect R&D investment?
Patent protections incentivize R&D by providing exclusivity but also create strategic considerations around patent filings, litigations, and licensing opportunities.

Q5: What is the outlook for biosimilars in EGFR TKI therapy?
Post-patent expiry, biosimilars are expected to reduce costs and improve access, though their development faces complexity due to the small molecule nature of EGFR TKIs compared to biologics.


Key Takeaways

  • Market growth is driven by rising NSCLC incidence, advances in targeted therapy, and expanding indications, with projections exceeding USD 13 billion by 2027.
  • Patent strategy and expiration significantly influence competition; early patent cliffs for first- and second-generation drugs open windows for biosimilar entry.
  • Innovation pipeline remains robust, emphasizing overcoming resistance and CNS penetration, with third-generation agents leading the charge.
  • Regulatory policies facilitate expedited access but also influence patent strategies and market confidence.
  • Competitive landscape is consolidating among legacy pharma companies, with biotech entrants focusing on mutation-specific agents and combination therapies.

References

  1. World Health Organization. (2022). Global Cancer Statistics 2022.
  2. IQVIA. (2022). Market Analysis and Forecast for Oncology Therapeutics.
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Approved Drugs Database.
  4. European Medicines Agency. (2022). Summary of Product Characteristics.
  5. Patent Databases: USPTO, EPO. (2022). Patent Filing and Expiry Data for EGFR TKIs.

Disclaimer: This report synthesizes publicly available data and expert analysis as of early 2023. Market conditions and patent statuses are dynamic and should be confirmed with current sources prior to investment or strategic decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.