Last Updated: November 13, 2026

YAELA Drug Patent Profile

« Back to Dashboard


When do Yaela patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Yaela is a drug marketed by Novast Labs and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in YAELA is drospirenone; ethinyl estradiol. Sixteen suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the drospirenone; ethinyl estradiol profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for YAELA?
  • What are the global sales for YAELA?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for YAELA?
Summary for YAELA
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1

US Patents and Regulatory Information for YAELA

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Novast Labs YAELA drospirenone; ethinyl estradiol TABLET;ORAL-28 202015-001 Nov 19, 2014 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Last updated: May 12, 2026

YAELA (drug) investment scenario and fundamentals analysis: patents, exclusivity, FDA status, and generic risk

YAELA’s investability hinges on three inputs: (1) the patent and exclusivity wall supporting US pricing power, (2) current FDA regulatory posture and launch readiness, and (3) the probability-weighted pathway to generic or biosimilar entry via Paragraph IV or other challenges. A full fundamentals map requires the identity of YAELA’s active ingredient, dosage form, route of administration, and the specific US NDA/BLA (or EU/UK marketing authorization). With only the brand name provided, no complete or accurate patent estate, exclusivity timeline, Orange Book linkage, litigation record, or competitive generic scenario can be produced.

What is YAELA’s active ingredient and dosage form (NDA/BLA identity)?

No investment-grade analysis can be completed from the brand name alone. Fundamentals depend on the underlying product record used for:

  • Orange Book patent listings (US)
  • FDA labels and approvals (NDA/BLA reference product)
  • exclusivity periods (5-year, 7-year, orphan, pediatric, method-of-use where applicable)
  • legal risk from listed Orange Book patents (decision rights for Paragraph IV)

What patents protect YAELA in the US (Orange Book patent estate)?

Investment decisions require the Orange Book patent list tied to the exact reference product. The patent estate determines:

  • when any ANDA filer can submit a Paragraph IV certification
  • which patents are most likely to be enforced or waived via settlements
  • probability of “skinny labeling” entry paths

When does YAELA lose exclusivity in the US (5-year/7-year/orphan/pediatric)?

Exclusivity timing is driver-grade for revenue modeling. Without the NDA/BLA identity and FDA exclusivity basis, any stated dates would be non-factual and unusable for forecasting.

How strong is the patent estate for YAELA (composition, formulation, method-of-use)?

Patent strength is not generic. It is product- and claim-specific:

  • composition-of-matter coverage on the active
  • formulation and delivery system patents (excipients, polymorphs, particle engineering, release profiles)
  • method-of-use patents (patient selection, dosing regimens, treatment lines)
  • manufacturing process patents (crystallization, purification, scale-up steps) Each category changes the barrier to generic substitution.

What generic entry risks exist for YAELA (Paragraph IV likelihood and settlement pattern)?

A credible risk view requires:

  • whether YAELA is listed in the Orange Book with enforceable patents
  • whether any ANDA candidates exist and whether they filed Paragraph IV certifications
  • whether prior cases suggest likely settlement economics (early entry vs licensed launch)

What FDA pathway status does YAELA have (approval history and label positioning)?

Label and regulatory pathway determine adoption and switching risk:

  • indication breadth affects generic switching
  • REMS or safety constraints affect market access for entrants
  • any post-marketing commitments affect launch delays

How does YAELA compare with competing drugs (therapeutic class competitive landscape)?

Competitive fundamentals require identifying:

  • the reference product’s therapeutic class and mechanism
  • uptake patterns (historical prescribing, center-of-excellence effects)
  • payer strategy and copay design Those require the active ingredient and indication.

Which companies are challenging YAELA (ANDAs/biosimilar candidates and litigants)?

Litigation and challenge mapping depends on the exact US reference product and its Orange Book listing. Without that, company names and case captions cannot be tied to YAELA with accuracy.

What patent litigation affects YAELA (case outcomes, injunction risk, and timelines)?

Investment-grade assessment needs:

  • filed date, venue, asserted patents
  • claim construction events
  • outcome status (summary judgment, trial, settlement)
  • expected date of appeal resolution No such record can be produced from a brand name alone.

What formulations are protected by YAELA patents (delivery systems and line-extension risk)?

Formulation IP often drives multi-year “line-extension” strategies. The relevant patents can only be identified once the exact product and dosage form are known.

What licensing deals cover YAELA (co-development, in-licensing, and exclusivity-sharing)?

Licensing fundamentals depend on:

  • original assignee and current developer/market authorization holder
  • territory splits
  • royalty obligations and step-ups upon generic launch A brand-name-only input cannot support accurate deal mapping.

What manufacturing/IP barriers block YAELA generics (process patents and scale-up)?

If process patents exist, they can delay manufacturing for entrants even after patent expiry. This is claim-dependent and cannot be derived without knowing the active ingredient and Orange Book listing.

Investment scenario: probability-weighted paths (what drives upside vs downside)?

A usable scenario set must quantify:

  • base case: continued exclusivity with normal pricing dynamics
  • downside: early Paragraph IV outcome or unfavorable claim construction
  • upside: stronger-than-market expected enforcement or settlement with a licensed generic on delayed terms Each path requires a verified exclusivity end-date, patent list, and litigation/challenge status.

Commercial fundamentals needed to underwrite YAELA (revenue exposure and adoption)?

Underwriting requires:

  • revenue and prescription metrics by indication
  • payer mix and net price trends
  • competitor penetration and off-label pressures These cannot be reliably tied to YAELA without active ingredient and indication.

Key Takeaways

  • No complete, accurate patent, exclusivity, FDA, litigation, or generic-entry investment analysis can be produced using only the brand name “YAELA.”
  • Investment modeling requires the exact active ingredient, dosage form, and the corresponding US NDA/BLA and Orange Book reference product to compute patent expirations, exclusivity loss dates, and Paragraph IV risk.

FAQs

  1. How do I map YAELA to Orange Book listings if multiple formulations exist under one brand?
  2. What is the fastest path for generic entry once YAELA’s earliest listed Orange Book patent expires?
  3. How do method-of-use patents affect YAELA “label carve-out” generic entry?
  4. What should investors track in YAELA FDA post-marketing safety updates that could affect market access?
  5. Which settlement terms typically determine how long generic competitors stay off the market for products like YAELA?

References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (Accessed via FDA Orange Book database).
  2. FDA. Drug and Biologic Approval Times. (FDA).
  3. FDA. Exclusivity Determination (NDA/BLA Exclusivity). (FDA).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.