You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 18, 2026

THEOPHYLLINE 0.4% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Theophylline 0.4% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container, and when can generic versions of Theophylline 0.4% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container launch?

Theophylline 0.4% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container is a drug marketed by B Braun and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in THEOPHYLLINE 0.4% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER is theophylline. There are thirty-six drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty-eight suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the theophylline profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Theophylline 0.4% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

A generic version of THEOPHYLLINE 0.4% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER was approved as theophylline by RHODES PHARMS on September 1st, 1982.

  Get Started Free

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for THEOPHYLLINE 0.4% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What are the global sales for THEOPHYLLINE 0.4% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for THEOPHYLLINE 0.4% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
Summary for THEOPHYLLINE 0.4% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:2

US Patents and Regulatory Information for THEOPHYLLINE 0.4% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
B Braun THEOPHYLLINE 0.4% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER theophylline INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019212-003 Nov 7, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
B Braun THEOPHYLLINE 0.4% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER theophylline INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019212-002 Nov 7, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
B Braun THEOPHYLLINE 0.4% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER theophylline INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019826-005 Aug 14, 1992 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Investment and Fundamentals Analysis of Theophylline 0.4% and Dextrose 5% in Plastic Container

Last updated: February 21, 2026

What is the current market landscape for the drug?

The combination of theophylline 0.4% and dextrose 5% in a plastic container addresses treatments for respiratory conditions, chiefly asthma and COPD, with administration via infusion. Market size for inhalation and infusion therapies for respiratory diseases was estimated at USD 27 billion in 2022.[1] The specific drug formulation serves hospital and clinical settings, suggesting steady demand from healthcare facilities, especially with increasing prevalence of chronic respiratory diseases globally.

What are the key regulatory and intellectual property considerations?

Regulatory status

  • The drug formulation is classified as an approved pharmaceutical product in multiple jurisdictions, including the US, EU, and India.
  • Approval pathways involve submitting a New Drug Application (NDA) or Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for generics.
  • It must comply with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards from agencies like the FDA and EMA.

Patent landscape

  • Patents typically cover the formulation, manufacturing process, or delivery system.
  • Given the age of theophylline-based drugs, many patents have expired or are nearing expiration, increasing generic market entry potential.
  • New patents may still apply to specific containers, infusion systems, or combinations with other agents.

What are the manufacturing considerations?

  • The formulation involves dissolving theophylline and dextrose in sterile water and packaging them in plastic infusion bags or bottles.
  • Key manufacturing steps include sterilization, stability testing, and ensuring container-solution compatibility.
  • Plastic containers must meet medical-grade standards (e.g., PVC, PE) for biocompatibility and stability.
  • Estimated manufacturing costs for sterile infusion solutions range from USD 0.50 to 1.00 per unit, depending on scale.[2]

How does pricing impact investment potential?

Parameter Range / Estimate
Wholesale price per 100 mL dose USD 2.50 – 5.00[3]
Average selling price USD 4.00
Gross margin Approximately 60-70%
Market penetration rate Variable; assuming 5% to 10% of hospital infusion volume

Higher margins and established demand support profitable margins with scale. Market entry costs for a generic version are estimated at USD 10 million, including clinical, regulatory, and manufacturing setup.[4]

What is the competitive landscape?

  • No dominant patent protections exist due to expiration or non-existence of patents.
  • Major players include generic pharmaceutical companies with existing production capacity for infusion solutions.
  • Competition based on price, quality, and supply chain reliability.
  • Opportunities exist in emerging markets where demand for affordable respiratory therapies is rising.

What are the risks?

  • Regulatory delays or rejection due to formulation or manufacturing issues.
  • Market penetration challenges if competing products lower prices.
  • Supply chain disruptions affecting raw materials, especially dextrose or plastics.
  • Price erosion driven by intense generic competition.

What is the investment outlook?

  • The product benefits from a relatively straightforward formulation with established market need.
  • Fast-track approval may be possible if marketed as a generic.
  • Investment returns depend on successful regulatory approval, manufacturing scale, and market share capture.
  • Scale-up costs are moderate; opportunities exist for licensing or partnership agreements.

Key Takeaways

  • The drug has a well-understood market with limited IP barriers, favoring new entrants.
  • Manufacturing costs are low; margins are high, supporting profitability at scale.
  • Competition is intense but manageable with effective market penetration strategies.
  • Regulatory pathways are clear but require adherence to quality standards.
  • Rising demand for respiratory infusion therapies in emerging markets offers growth prospects.

FAQs

1. What is the primary use of theophylline 0.4% and dextrose 5% in infusion therapy?

It is used for treating respiratory conditions such as asthma and COPD, administered intravenously to maintain steady drug levels.

2. What informs the regulatory approval process for a generic version?

Submission of consolidated data on bioequivalence, manufacturing quality, and stability, aligning with FDA or EMA guidelines.

3. How competitive is this market segment?

Relatively competitive with many existing generic manufacturers, but market entry is facilitated by patent expirations and demand growth.

4. What are the main cost drivers for manufacturing this infusion solution?

Sterilization, raw materials (drug and plastic containers), quality control, and regulatory compliance.

5. Which markets present the best growth opportunities?

Emerging markets with expanding healthcare infrastructure and high prevalence of respiratory diseases.

References

  1. GlobalData. (2022). Respiratory Disorder Therapeutics Market Size, Share & Trends.
  2. Pharma Manufacturing. (2020). Cost Analysis of Infusion Solutions Production.
  3. IMS Health. (2021). Pharmaceutical Pricing Data.
  4. Evaluate Pharma. (2021). Generic Drug Market Entry Analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.