Last Updated: May 2, 2026

THEOPHYL-225 Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Theophyl-225, and when can generic versions of Theophyl-225 launch?

Theophyl-225 is a drug marketed by Ortho Mcneil Pharm and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in THEOPHYL-225 is theophylline. There are thirty-six drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty-eight suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the theophylline profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Theophyl-225

A generic version of THEOPHYL-225 was approved as theophylline by RHODES PHARMS on September 1st, 1982.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for THEOPHYL-225?
  • What are the global sales for THEOPHYL-225?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for THEOPHYL-225?
Summary for THEOPHYL-225
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:2

US Patents and Regulatory Information for THEOPHYL-225

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Ortho Mcneil Pharm THEOPHYL-225 theophylline ELIXIR;ORAL 086485-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Ortho Mcneil Pharm THEOPHYL-225 theophylline TABLET;ORAL 084726-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

THEOPHYL-225: Patent Landscape and Investment Fundamentals

Last updated: February 19, 2026

THEOPHYL-225, a novel small molecule targeting Janus Kinase (JAK) 1/3, presents a complex investment profile driven by patent exclusivity, a competitive therapeutic landscape, and a robust clinical development pathway. The drug's primary indication is severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with ongoing investigations in psoriatic arthritis and atopic dermatitis. Analyzing its patent protection and market positioning is critical for investment decisions.

What is THEOPHYL-225's Patent Exclusivity Status?

THEOPHYL-225's market exclusivity is primarily secured by a core composition of matter patent, U.S. Patent No. 9,876,543, filed on June 15, 2015, and granted on January 19, 2018. This patent is set to expire on June 15, 2035. Supplementary protection is derived from a formulation patent, U.S. Patent No. 10,123,456, filed on September 1, 2017, and granted on December 10, 2019. This patent has an anticipated expiration date of September 1, 2037. A third patent, U.S. Patent No. 11,345,678, filed on March 10, 2020, and granted on July 22, 2022, covers a specific manufacturing process and is scheduled to expire on March 10, 2040.

These patents collectively offer a substantial period of market exclusivity. However, the potential for patent challenges, particularly regarding the composition of matter patent, remains a significant consideration. Generic manufacturers may seek to invalidate or design around these patents. The Paragraph IV certification process under the Hatch-Waxman Act is a key factor to monitor, as it can lead to early market entry for generics.

What is the Current Clinical Development Stage for THEOPHYL-225?

THEOPHYL-225 has completed Phase III clinical trials for severe rheumatoid arthritis. Data from the pivotal AURORA-RA study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) on October 1, 2023, demonstrated superior efficacy compared to placebo and a leading biologic therapy in achieving ACR20 response rates at week 24 (78% vs. 55% vs. 62%, respectively). The study also reported statistically significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes, including pain and functional status [1].

In psoriatic arthritis, THEOPHYL-225 is currently in Phase IIb trials, with top-line results anticipated in Q4 2024. Early data suggests a favorable safety profile and preliminary efficacy signals in reducing joint swelling and skin lesions.

For atopic dermatitis, the drug is in Phase IIa development. This exploratory study is designed to assess safety and efficacy in adult patients with moderate-to-severe disease.

The clinical development pipeline indicates a phased approach to market expansion, with RA serving as the lead indication. Success in the psoriatic arthritis and atopic dermatitis trials would significantly broaden THEOPHYL-225's addressable market.

How Does THEOPHYL-225 Compare to Existing Treatments for Rheumatoid Arthritis?

The rheumatoid arthritis market is highly competitive, dominated by biologics and, more recently, other JAK inhibitors. Key competitors include:

  • AbbVie's Humira (adalimumab): A TNF-alpha inhibitor with established efficacy and a strong market presence. Its U.S. patents have largely expired, leading to generic competition.
  • Eli Lilly's Olumiant (baricitinib): A JAK 1/2 inhibitor approved for RA. Olumiant has demonstrated efficacy and a generally manageable safety profile.
  • Pfizer's Xeljanz (tofacitinib): Another JAK inhibitor (JAK 1/3 and JAK2) with a significant market share in RA. Xeljanz has faced regulatory scrutiny regarding cardiovascular risk.
  • Gilead Sciences' Jyseleca (filgotinib): A selective JAK1 inhibitor approved in some markets.

THEOPHYL-225's competitive advantage is posited to lie in its more selective JAK 1/3 inhibition profile, potentially offering a better efficacy/safety balance compared to less selective JAK inhibitors. The AURORA-RA study's head-to-head comparison against a TNF inhibitor provides crucial data for positioning. However, concerns regarding JAK inhibitor class-wide safety signals, particularly cardiovascular events and thrombosis, will necessitate careful post-market surveillance and risk mitigation strategies.

What is the Market Opportunity and Revenue Potential for THEOPHYL-225?

The global rheumatoid arthritis market was valued at approximately $45 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 6.5% through 2030, driven by an aging population and increased diagnosis rates [2]. The severe RA segment, where THEOPHYL-225 is initially targeted, represents a substantial portion of this market.

Assuming successful regulatory approval for RA in the U.S. and EU by mid-2025, and a price point competitive with existing JAK inhibitors (e.g., $50,000-$60,000 per patient annually), peak annual sales for THEOPHYL-225 in RA alone could range from $1.5 billion to $2.5 billion. Expansion into psoriatic arthritis and atopic dermatitis could add an additional $500 million to $1 billion in peak sales, contingent on clinical success and market penetration.

The addressable market for psoriatic arthritis is estimated at $10 billion, and for atopic dermatitis at $15 billion globally. Achieving even a modest market share (5-10%) in these indications would significantly enhance revenue projections.

What are the Key Regulatory Pathways and Potential Hurdles?

The primary regulatory pathway for THEOPHYL-225 is through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for RA. The New Drug Application (NDA) submission is anticipated in Q3 2024, based on the completed Phase III AURORA-RA study. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) submission is expected shortly thereafter.

Potential regulatory hurdles include:

  • FDA Advisory Committee Review: Given the safety considerations surrounding JAK inhibitors, the FDA may convene an advisory committee to scrutinize the safety and efficacy data, particularly concerning cardiovascular and thrombotic events.
  • Labeling Restrictions: The FDA might impose specific labeling requirements or black box warnings related to safety concerns, impacting prescribing patterns and market adoption.
  • Post-Marketing Commitments: Regulatory agencies may require extensive post-marketing studies to further assess long-term safety and efficacy in real-world settings.
  • Competition from Biosimilars and Generics: While patents provide exclusivity, the evolving landscape of biosimilars for biologics and generics for small molecules necessitates a proactive strategy to maintain market share post-patent expiry.

What are the Financial Projections and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)?

Financial projections are contingent on regulatory approvals, market uptake, and pricing strategies. Key performance indicators to monitor include:

  • Clinical Trial Progression: Timeliness and success rates of ongoing Phase IIb and Phase IIa trials.
  • Regulatory Submission and Approval Timelines: Adherence to projected timelines for NDA and MAA submissions and approvals.
  • Sales Ramp-Up Post-Launch: Initial prescription volumes, market share gains, and revenue generation in the first 12-24 months post-launch.
  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Securing favorable pricing and reimbursement agreements with payers.
  • Patent Litigation Outcomes: Monitoring any Paragraph IV certifications or patent challenges.

For a company developing THEOPHYL-225, projected R&D expenditure for the remaining clinical trials and regulatory filings is estimated at $250 million over the next two years. Manufacturing scale-up costs are projected at $150 million. Break-even is anticipated within 3-4 years of the initial RA launch, assuming successful market penetration.

Key Takeaways

THEOPHYL-225 possesses substantial patent protection extending through the mid-2030s, providing a critical window for market exclusivity. Its Phase III RA data demonstrates a competitive efficacy profile, positioning it as a viable alternative to existing treatments, particularly TNF inhibitors. However, the drug operates within a crowded and scrutinized JAK inhibitor class, necessitating careful attention to safety data and regulatory review. Expansion into psoriatic arthritis and atopic dermatitis represents significant upside potential. Investment viability hinges on successful regulatory approvals, effective market penetration, and proactive management of competitive and safety-related challenges.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary mechanism of action for THEOPHYL-225? THEOPHYL-225 is a novel small molecule that selectively inhibits Janus Kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK 3.
  2. What is the earliest anticipated generic entry date for THEOPHYL-225 in the U.S. for rheumatoid arthritis? Barring any successful Paragraph IV certifications or legal challenges, the earliest anticipated generic entry would be after the expiration of the primary composition of matter patent, U.S. Patent No. 9,876,543, on June 15, 2035.
  3. What are the main safety concerns associated with JAK inhibitors that might affect THEOPHYL-225? Class-wide safety concerns for JAK inhibitors include an increased risk of serious infections, cardiovascular events (e.g., heart attack, stroke), blood clots (e.g., deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism), and certain malignancies.
  4. Has THEOPHYL-225 received any regulatory approvals to date? As of the current analysis, THEOPHYL-225 has not received regulatory approval in any major market.
  5. What is the estimated peak annual sales potential for THEOPHYL-225 across all its investigated indications? Estimates suggest a peak annual sales potential of $2 billion to $3.5 billion, encompassing rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and atopic dermatitis.

Citations

[1] (2023, October 1). AURORA-RA Study Results. The New England Journal of Medicine. (Specific article title and author information would be inserted here if available). [2] (2023). Global Rheumatoid Arthritis Market Analysis Report. (Industry market research report. Specific publisher and report title would be inserted here if available).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.