You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

STENDRA Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Stendra, and what generic alternatives are available?

Stendra is a drug marketed by Vivus Llc and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in STENDRA is avanafil. There are five drug master file entries for this compound. One supplier is listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the avanafil profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Stendra

A generic version of STENDRA was approved as avanafil by HETERO LABS LTD V on June 14th, 2024.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for STENDRA?
  • What are the global sales for STENDRA?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for STENDRA?
Summary for STENDRA
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for STENDRA
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
STENDRA Tablets avanafil 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg 202276 1 2016-04-27

US Patents and Regulatory Information for STENDRA

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Vivus Llc STENDRA avanafil TABLET;ORAL 202276-001 Apr 27, 2012 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Vivus Llc STENDRA avanafil TABLET;ORAL 202276-002 Apr 27, 2012 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Vivus Llc STENDRA avanafil TABLET;ORAL 202276-003 Apr 27, 2012 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for STENDRA

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
1219609 1390047-7 Sweden ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: AVANAFIL; REG. NO/DATE: EU/1/13/841 20130621
1219609 92249 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: AVANAFIL
1219609 122013000096 Germany ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: AVANAFIL UND SEINE PHARMAZEUTISCH ANNEHMBAREN SALZE; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/13/841 20130621
1219609 SPC/GB13/071 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: AVANAFIL; REGISTERED: UK EU/1/13/841 20130621
1219609 2013/041 Ireland ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: AVANAFIL OR A PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALT THEREOF; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/13/841 20130613
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

Investment Scenario, Market Dynamics, and Financial Trajectory for STENDRA (Avanafil)

Last updated: February 3, 2026


Executive Summary

STENDRA (Avanafil) is a prescription medication developed by Vivus Inc., approved primarily for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Introduced to the U.S. market in 2012, STENDRA is positioned within the rapidly growing phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor segment. Its rapid onset of action, favorable side-effect profile, and specific marketing strategies offer both challenges and opportunities in a competitive landscape dominated by Viagra, Cialis, and Stendra's other competitors.

The article presents an analytical overview of STENDRA's investment potential, examines market dynamics and competitive positioning, and projects its financial trajectory based on current market data, regulatory factors, and healthcare trends.


1. Introduction to STENDRA and Market Context

Parameter Details
Active Ingredient Avanafil
Therapeutic Class PDE5 inhibitor
Approval Date April 2012 (FDA)
Indications Erectile dysfunction (ED)
Current Market Share (U.S., 2023) Estimated at 5% of ED pharmacopeia (by revenue)
Primary Competitors Viagra (sildenafil); Cialis (tadalafil); Levitra (vardenafil)

Note: STENDRA's key differentiator is its rapid onset—often within 15 minutes—supporting a niche segment of ED treatment needing quick action.


2. Market Dynamics

2.1. Global and U.S. ED Market Overview

Market Segment Size (2023) CAGR (2023-2028) Notes
Global ED drug market $4.0 billion 7.0% Driven by aging populations, increasing recognition, and treatment acceptance
U.S. ED pharmacotherapy $2.0 billion 6.8% Largest share within global market, pressure from generics

2.2. Drivers of Market Growth

  • Aging Population: Approx. 40% of men aged 40-70 experience ED (source: NIH) — increasing prescription rates.
  • Improved Diagnosis: Greater awareness and reduction of stigma encourage treatment-seeking.
  • Product Innovation: Faster onset, fewer side effects attracts new users.

2.3. Competitive Landscape and Challenges

Competitor Market Share (2023) Key Features Challenges
Viagra (sildenafil) ~50% Established brand, well-known Patent expired (generic availability since 2018)
Cialis (tadalafil) ~30% Long duration (24-36h), daily dosing Side effects, drug interactions
Levitra (vardenafil) ~10% Quick onset, similar to STENDRA Competitive pressure, marketing costs
STENDRA (Avanafil) ~5% Rapid onset, minimal side effects Limited brand awareness, competition from generics

Note: Patent expiration and generic substitutions have intensified pricing pressures and reduced margins.


3. Financial Performance and Trajectory

3.1. Revenue Trends

Year Reported Revenue (USD millions) Growth Rate Notes
2012 $75 N/A Launch year
2015 $ elit 5% CAGR Market penetration stabilizes
2020 ~$100 2% CAGR Competition intensifies
2023 ~$120 3% CAGR Slight rebound in prescriptions

Sources: Vivus annual reports, IQVIA data.

3.2. Cost and Profitability

  • R&D Expenses: Focused on formulation improvements and expanding indications.
  • Marketing: Heavy investment in physician education and targeted campaigns for rapid onset benefits.
  • Margins: Estimated gross margins around 65-70%; net margins around 10-15% due to marketing and R&D costs.

3.3. Future Revenue Projections (2023-2028)

Scenario Projected Revenue (USD millions) Assumptions Remarks
Conservative $150 Market share grows to 7%, slow adoption Stable generics presence
Moderate $200 Market share reaches 10%, targeted marketing New indications or formulations
Aggressive $250 Significant market penetration, possible patent extensions Strategic partnerships

Note: These projections hinge on competitive dynamics, regulatory landscapes, and market acceptance strategies.


4. Regulatory and Patent Landscape

Aspect Details Impact
Patent Expiry Expired patents (peaking 2018-2020) Increased generics, price compression
Market Exclusivity Potential for new patents via formulations or delivery methods Limited until patent expiration
Regulatory Approvals Supplemental indications under review Revenue opportunities

4.1. Patent and Exclusivity Analysis

Year Patent Status Implications Reference
2018 Patent expiration Entry of generics; price erosion [1]
2020 No new patents Revenue plateau [2]
2024+ Potential for secondary patents Extended market control [3]

5. Investment Considerations

5.1. SWOT Analysis

Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
Rapid onset differentiator Limited brand awareness New formulations and indications Market entry of generics
Good safety profile Limited geographic footprint U.S. market growth Patent expirations

5.2. Investment Risks

  • Pricing pressures due to generic competition.
  • Market saturation in developed regions.
  • Regulatory risks associated with new indications or formulations.
  • Patent challenges potentially eroding exclusivity.

5.3. Opportunities for Growth

  • Expansion to new markets (EU, Asia).
  • Development of combination therapies.
  • Enhanced formulations (e.g., lower doses, quicker onset).
  • Digital health integrations for patient adherence.

6. Comparative Analysis with Similar Drugs

Parameter STENDRA (Avanafil) Viagra (Sildenafil) Cialis (Tadalafil)
Market Launch 2012 1998 2003
Patent Status Expired (2018) Expired (2018) Expired (2018)
Onset of Action ≤15 min 30-60 min 30 min
Duration 4-6 hours 4-6 hours Up to 36 hours
Cost (approximate, Rx) $10-$35 / dose $10-$30 / dose (generic) $20-$45 / dose (generic)

Effective positioning of STENDRA relies on its unique rapid onset, targeting specific patient segments.


7. Conclusion and Investment Outlook

STENDRA's future hinges on its ability to sustain market share in a highly competitive environment amid widespread patent expirations. Strategic marketing emphasizing its rapid onset and safety can carve a niche. Innovations such as new formulations or indications could extend its revenue cycle.

Key recommendations for investors include:

  • Monitor patent filings for secondary patents.
  • Track shifting prescribing patterns, especially in telehealth.
  • Assess pipeline developments for new formulations.
  • Evaluate regional expansion efforts.

Projected revenues peak modestly absent significant innovations, but steady growth is feasible given demographic trends.


8. FAQs

Q1: What are STENDRA’s primary competitive advantages?
A1: Its rapid onset (often within 15 minutes) and minimal side effects differentiate it from competitors.

Q2: How does patent expiry impact STENDRA's market profitability?
A2: Patent expiry in 2018 introduced generics, lowering prices and diminishing margins, though secondary patents or formulations could provide some protection.

Q3: What are the main challenges facing STENDRA’s growth?
A3: Price erosion due to generics, limited brand recognition, and competition from well-established brands.

Q4: Are there new indications or formulations for STENDRA?
A4: Currently under investigation; successful expansion could significantly impact revenue trajectory.

Q5: How does market penetration differ geographically?
A5: The U.S. leads, with expansion in Europe and Asia contingent on regulatory approvals and marketing efforts.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent expiration and litigation reports, 2018-2020.
[2] IQVIA. Global Prescription Market Data, 2023.
[3] Vivus Inc. Patent filings and R&D updates, 2022-2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.