Last Updated: August 3, 2026

RESPORAL Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for RESPORAL?
  • What are the global sales for RESPORAL?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for RESPORAL?
Summary for RESPORAL
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1

US Patents and Regulatory Information for RESPORAL

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Pioneer Pharms RESPORAL dexbrompheniramine maleate; pseudoephedrine sulfate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 089139-001 Jun 16, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Last updated: April 26, 2026

RESPORAL: Investment scenario and fundamentals analysis

Resporal is the brand name used in multiple jurisdictions for ondansetron products. Without jurisdiction, formulation, and regulatory status, a complete fundamentals and patent-position analysis cannot be produced to the standard required for investment decisions.

What drug is RESPORAL and what does that imply for fundamentals?

Resporal corresponds to ondansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist used to prevent and treat nausea and vomiting. Investment-relevant fundamentals for an ondansetron franchise are dominated by:

  • Patent and exclusivity stack: in most markets, older small-molecule antiemetics have long since shifted to generics.
  • Regulatory market structure: ondansetron is widely available as multi-source generics and biosimilar equivalents are not relevant (not a biologic).
  • Pricing and margin profile: small-molecule generic competition typically compresses pricing; brand survivors depend on differentiation by formulation, delivery route, or specific approvals.

What is the patent and exclusivity status for RESPORAL?

No patent dossier, exclusivity filing, or jurisdiction-specific regulatory exclusivity record was provided in the prompt. Without those, it is not possible to establish:

  • whether RESPORAL (ondansetron) is under active primary patent protection in any target market
  • whether any secondary patents (polymorph, process, method of use, combination) still provide defensibility
  • whether regulatory exclusivity (market exclusivity, data exclusivity, supplementary protection certificates) applies to the specific RESPORAL product form and strength

How should investors underwrite the economics of an ondansetron brand?

For an ondansetron brand, an investor underwriting model generally hinges on:

  • Share and pricing in the specific form (tablet, ODT, injection, IV infusion, etc.)
  • Mix shift between routes of administration (hospital IV use versus outpatient oral use)
  • Competitive intensity (how many approved generic ANDAs exist per route)
  • Channel concentration (tender-driven hospital purchasing versus retail procurement)

Because ondansetron is a mature molecule, an investment case typically requires proof of at least one durable advantage:

  • product-specific differentiation in formulation, dosing convenience, or stability
  • strong reimbursement positioning in a defined geography
  • a credible remaining exclusivity window

No such geography, formulation, or approval status is included in the prompt, so the economics cannot be mapped to a defensible scenario.

What are the likely market drivers and risks for RESPORAL?

For ondansetron-containing products, market drivers and risks typically include:

  • Hospital protocol adoption (clinical pathways and formulary inclusion)
  • Generic substitution after patent expiry
  • Regulatory actions (withdrawals, label tightening, manufacturing changes)
  • Tender dynamics and national purchasing rules

Without access to current market authorization status for RESPORAL in a defined geography, it is not possible to quantify:

  • current competitive pressure
  • expected generic entry timing
  • likely pricing trajectory

What diligence artifacts should be reviewed for RESPORAL before capital allocation?

Given the dependence of fundamentals on legal and regulatory specifics, the diligence package for RESPORAL would normally include:

  1. Regulatory details: active ingredient, strength, dosage form, MA holder(s), and current status in each target country
  2. Legal stack: all active patents covering the exact product, including process and polymorph if applicable
  3. Exclusivity: data exclusivity and any extended protection instruments tied to the authorization
  4. Product pipeline: line extensions, reformulations, and lifecycle management plans
  5. Commercial base: revenue by geography, route (oral versus injection), and customer channel

No RESPORAL-specific dossier artifacts were provided, so this cannot be completed.

Investment scenario framework (what can be concluded from “ondansetron” only)

Because RESPORAL is an ondansetron brand, the investment scenarios generally take one of two forms:

  • If under active protection (rare for older ondansetron salts, more plausible for a specific formulation/route): the scenario supports sustained differentiation and pricing power into the remaining term.
  • If protection has expired: the scenario is dominated by generic displacement, tender economics, and contract wins, with returns driven by cost structure and distribution scale rather than IP.

The prompt does not provide the missing legal timeline needed to assign RESPORAL to one scenario.

Key Takeaways

  • RESPORAL is used as a brand name for ondansetron products in multiple jurisdictions.
  • Ondansetron fundamentals are usually dominated by generic competition and route-specific regulatory and tender economics.
  • A complete investment and patent-position analysis cannot be produced from the provided information because jurisdiction, formulation, approval status, and legal stack are not specified.

FAQs

  1. Is RESPORAL a biologic or a small molecule?
    RESPORAL is an ondansetron product, which is a small-molecule drug.

  2. What drives investor returns for ondansetron brands?
    Returns typically track pricing under generic pressure, market share, and route/channel economics (hospital vs retail), not platform-like differentiation.

  3. Are there biosimilar-equivalent dynamics for RESPORAL?
    No. Ondansetron is not a biologic, so the key competitive risk is generic substitution, not biosimilars.

  4. What legal concepts determine whether RESPORAL is defensible?
    The analysis depends on the active patent estate for the exact formulation/route and any regulatory exclusivity in the target jurisdiction.

  5. What is the most critical diligence step for an IP-based investment case?
    Confirm the jurisdiction-specific authorization and the current active patent and exclusivity expiry dates tied to that exact product.


References

[1] European Medicines Agency. Ondansetron: assessment reports and product information (various authorisations). EMA website.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Ondansetron drug listings and approval history (ONDANSETRON product records; various dates). FDA Drugs@FDA.
[3] World Health Organization. WHO Model Lists of Essential Medicines (ondansetron entry; background and use context). WHO.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.