Last Updated: September 28, 2026

PEN-VEE K Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Pen-vee K, and when can generic versions of Pen-vee K launch?

Pen-vee K is a drug marketed by Wyeth Ayerst and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in PEN-VEE K is penicillin v potassium. Seventeen suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the penicillin v potassium profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Pen-vee K

A generic version of PEN-VEE K was approved as penicillin v potassium by CHARTWELL RX on November 23rd, 1988.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for PEN-VEE K?
  • What are the global sales for PEN-VEE K?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for PEN-VEE K?
Summary for PEN-VEE K
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:2

US Patents and Regulatory Information for PEN-VEE K

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Wyeth Ayerst PEN-VEE K penicillin v potassium FOR SOLUTION;ORAL 060007-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Wyeth Ayerst PEN-VEE K penicillin v potassium TABLET;ORAL 060006-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Wyeth Ayerst PEN-VEE K penicillin v potassium FOR SOLUTION;ORAL 060007-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Wyeth Ayerst PEN-VEE K penicillin v potassium TABLET;ORAL 060006-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Last updated: July 24, 2026

PEN-VEE K (Penicillin V Potassium) Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis: Patent, Exclusivity, Litigation, and FDA Commercial Outlook

Pen-Vee K (penicillin V potassium) is an established, generic-competitive oral penicillin used for select bacterial infections. From an investment fundamentals standpoint, the drug’s value is driven by (1) narrow clinical positioning, (2) limited ability to differentiate versus other penicillin V formulations and therapeutic alternatives, and (3) pricing pressure typical of long-supplied products. On IP, the drug’s original active ingredient and core composition IP is out of typical patent coverage, leaving modern economics primarily tied to formulation, manufacturing, labeling, and any later-developed patents rather than blockbuster-style exclusivity.

What patents protect Pen-Vee K?

Short answer: The commercial IP relevant to Pen-Vee K is typically limited to later-life formulation, polymorph/crystal form, manufacturing process, and specific method-of-use or stability/shelf-life claims, while composition-of-active-ingredient and early method claims are generally expired for penicillin V potassium products.

Which patent classes usually remain for oral penicillin products after active-ingredient expiration?

  • Solid-state form or crystallization-related claims for penicillin V potassium
  • Manufacturing process controls for dissolution, drying, particle size, or impurity profiles
  • Formulation patents (excipients, granulation, coatings, stability)
  • Packaging and label-related IP that can affect interchangeability
  • Bioequivalence-specific approaches are usually not enforceable as patents, so regulatory exclusivity is more important than pharmacokinetic IP for generics

When does Pen-Vee K lose exclusivity?

Short answer: Penicillin V potassium products have long passed the standard composition/first-filing exclusivity window. For investors, the binding “timeline” is usually not statutory exclusivity for the active ingredient, but whether any remaining Orange Book listings or bottleneck patents block generic entrants for specific labeled strengths, dosage forms, or manufacturing routes.

How do exclusivity concepts apply to a long-established genericized antibiotic?

  • New chemical entity (NCE) exclusivity: Not applicable as penicillin V potassium is not new.
  • Orphan drug exclusivity: Depends on an approved orphan indication, which is not a typical structure for antibiotics like Pen-Vee K.
  • Pediatric exclusivity: Could apply only if a sponsor qualifies and obtains a pediatric supplement. For older generics this is uncommon and would show up through FDA exclusivity records, not as Orange Book patents alone.
  • Patent exclusivity (Hatch-Waxman): Only the patents listed in the Orange Book for the specific NDA and strength/dosage form matter.

What is the Orange Book status of Pen-Vee K?

Short answer: Pen-Vee K is expected to have a mature, multi-sponsor generic landscape; Orange Book status generally indicates older patents, potentially with some formulation or manufacturing listings that are no longer effective against authorized generics or multiple ANDA approvals.

What investors should check in the Orange Book for Pen-Vee K

  • Whether any patents still show as “expired” versus “active”
  • Whether any listed patents are listed for the relevant strength (e.g., 250 mg/5 mL oral suspension equivalents are different SKUs from tablets)
  • Whether any listed patents are tied to specific dosage forms (tablets vs powder/suspension)
  • Status codes and legal events

What generic entry risks exist for Pen-Vee K?

Short answer: Generic entry risk is lower in the sense that most entry barriers are already cleared; the ongoing risk is not “first generic entry,” but margin compression from incremental supply, authorized generics, and substitute antibiotics.

What actually moves Pen-Vee K pricing and volume?

  • Institutional formularies and contracting practices
  • Supply reliability and manufacturing disruptions across multiple generic manufacturers
  • Substitution at the point of care to other beta-lactams or broader-spectrum alternatives
  • Antibiotic stewardship and guideline adherence patterns
  • Inventory cycles and wholesaler demand for pediatric and oral penicillin regimens

How strong is the patent estate for Pen-Vee K?

Short answer: For long-established antibiotics, patent estate strength is usually weak for creating sustained pricing power. Investment-grade value comes only if there are still enforceable, Orange-Book-listed patents that affect manufacturing approval, labeling, or stability for a specific dosage form and strength.

What “strong” would look like in practice for Pen-Vee K

  • Multiple unexpired Orange Book patents tied to a specific commercial SKU
  • Patents covering high-impact formulation or manufacturing steps that are hard to design around
  • Active patent litigation or stay/launch blocking for an ANDA

For mature penicillin V products, this profile is often absent; the practical result is a commodity-like competitive structure.

What patent litigation affects Pen-Vee K?

Short answer: For older generics like penicillin V potassium, the litigation record is typically historical and fragmented across legacy formulation patents. Current litigation risk is usually low unless an Orange Book patent is still active and tied to a new ANDA entrant.

What to treat as “material” litigation for an investment model

  • Any recent Federal Circuit or district court decisions changing enforceability
  • Court orders affecting launch timelines for a major competitor
  • Settlement agreements that delay generic competition for specific ANDAs

What formulations are protected by Pen-Vee K patents?

Short answer: Any remaining protection would likely be formulation- or process-oriented rather than new clinical-use claims.

Dosage-form relevance

Pen-Vee K can be sold in different presentations (tablets and liquid equivalents depending on market and SKU). Patent scope usually tracks the specific formulation:

  • Tablet excipient system and manufacturing process
  • Oral suspension/powder handling, stability, and impurity profile
  • Shelf-life and reconstitution/stability specifications

How does Pen-Vee K compare with other penicillin V and alternative antibiotics?

Short answer: Penicillin V potassium competes on:

  • Narrower antibacterial spectrum versus broader agents
  • Oral administration convenience
  • Cost and coverage in formularies
  • Pediatric acceptability and stability of liquid formulations

Competitive set investors should consider in substitution

  • Other oral penicillins (e.g., amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate where clinically appropriate)
  • Cephalosporins for certain infections
  • Therapeutic guideline preference for streptococcal pharyngitis and select prophylaxis scenarios (where applicable)

What do FDA regulatory status signals imply for Pen-Vee K supply risk?

Short answer: For older antibiotics, regulatory risk is more about manufacturing compliance (quality systems, inspections, facility approvals) than about unique clinical regulatory hurdles.

FDA pathway and market impact (what matters commercially)

  • ANDA approvals allow rapid competition, reducing pricing power
  • If a manufacturer loses manufacturing site status or faces compliance issues, supply shortages can briefly lift pricing
  • Recalls and quality events can re-route demand to remaining suppliers

Investment scenario: where the return drivers are (and aren’t)

Short answer: The investment thesis for Pen-Vee K exposure is usually a “supply and contracting” model rather than a “durable IP” model.

Likely return drivers

  • Contracted pricing in institutional channels
  • Volume stability tied to pediatric and primary care prescribing habits
  • Short-term pricing improvements from supply disruptions among generic suppliers
  • If you control manufacturing capacity, quality, and throughput, you can defend market share

Likely return inhibitors

  • Ongoing generics competition and authorized generic pressure
  • Wholesale price transparency and PBM contracting dynamics
  • Substitution toward different antibiotics if clinical pathways shift
  • Margin compression typical of mature small-molecule generics

Commercial fundamentals to model for Pen-Vee K

Short answer: Build a spreadsheet around unit volume stability, net price trend, and supplier concentration, then overlay event risk (quality, recalls, capacity outages).

What to model in a 12 to 36 month horizon

  • Net sales by channel (institutional vs retail)
  • Net price per unit and quarterly trend, net of rebates/contracts
  • Gross margin sensitivity to raw material costs and compliance overhead
  • Forecasted availability based on the number of active ANDA suppliers
  • Event risk calendar: inspections, quality changes, recalls, and facility closures

Key Takeaways

  • Pen-Vee K is an established oral antibiotic with commodity-like economics typical of older small-molecule generics.
  • Sustained investment upside depends more on manufacturing execution, supply dynamics, and contracting terms than on new, enforceable patent exclusivity.
  • Patent strength is likely limited to late-life formulation or process claims; investors should treat Orange Book as the gatekeeper for any remaining launch or competitive blocking ability.
  • For valuation, prioritize pricing and volume resilience, supplier concentration risk, and the probability of supply shocks over long-duration exclusivity scenarios.

FAQs

1) Is Pen-Vee K still protected by patents listed in the Orange Book?
Orange Book protection for penicillin V potassium products, if present, is typically limited to later-life formulation or process patents tied to specific NDA/strength/dosage forms.

2) What typically triggers price spikes for mature generic antibiotics like Pen-Vee K?
Manufacturing disruptions, quality events/recalls, and supplier capacity loss are the main triggers in mature antibiotic markets.

3) Do Paragraph IV ANDA challenges materially affect Pen-Vee K competition today?
Material impact is unlikely unless a still-active Orange Book patent is involved in a recent ANDA and litigation is actively staying launches.

4) How do substitute antibiotics affect Pen-Vee K demand?
Guideline and formulary substitution toward other oral beta-lactams changes prescribing patterns and can reduce Pen-Vee K share even when it remains clinically appropriate.

5) What is the main regulatory risk for an investor exposed to Pen-Vee K manufacturing?
Quality system compliance and facility approval continuity, including inspections and recall management, drive most regulatory risk and associated sales volatility.

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. FDA.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Approvals and Databases. FDA.
  3. FDA. Exclusivity Determinations for Approved Drugs. FDA.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.