You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 18, 2026

PAXIL Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Paxil patents expire, and when can generic versions of Paxil launch?

Paxil is a drug marketed by Apotex and is included in four NDAs.

The generic ingredient in PAXIL is paroxetine hydrochloride. There are thirty drug master file entries for this compound. Forty-four suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the paroxetine hydrochloride profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for PAXIL?
  • What are the global sales for PAXIL?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for PAXIL?
Summary for PAXIL

US Patents and Regulatory Information for PAXIL

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Apotex PAXIL paroxetine hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 020885-001 Oct 9, 1998 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Apotex PAXIL paroxetine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 020031-002 Dec 29, 1992 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Apotex PAXIL paroxetine hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 020885-004 Oct 9, 1998 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Apotex PAXIL CR paroxetine hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 020936-002 Feb 16, 1999 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Apotex PAXIL paroxetine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 020031-003 Dec 29, 1992 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Apotex PAXIL paroxetine hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 020885-002 Oct 9, 1998 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

International Patents for PAXIL

See the table below for patents covering PAXIL around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Japan H11228571 NEW COMPOUND ⤷  Get Started Free
Lithuania 96007 ⤷  Get Started Free
Netherlands 1013749 ⤷  Get Started Free
Spain 2209428 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 697982 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 6307299 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

PAXIL Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis

Last updated: February 3, 2026

Overview
PAXIL (paroxetine) is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), primarily prescribed for depression, anxiety, OCD, and related disorders. Initially developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), it remains a significant product in the antidepressant market. Its patent expired in most major markets around 2013–2014, increasing generic competition and impacting revenue streams. Analyzing its current investment viability requires an assessment of market position, patent landscape, generics impact, and regulatory environment.

Market Position and Sales Trends
PAXIL's global sales peaked before patent expiration, generating over $1.4 billion in annual revenue worldwide during 2004–2006. Post-patent, sales declined sharply due to generic entry, with GSK reporting worldwide sales of approximately $100 million in 2021 for “Paxil” or “paroxetine” formulations. Generics now dominate, reducing GSK’s direct revenues but expanding access and prescribing rates due to reduced costs.

Patent and Regulatory Landscape
The PAXIL patent expiration facilitated generics, leading to a steep decline in branded sales by 2014. However, brand retention persists through formulation patents, secondary patents, or formulations targeting specific indications. Regulatory approvals for generics in the US and EU were granted circa 2014, leading to rapid market share erosion. GSK’s shifting strategy involves licensing, biosimilars, or branded extensions in newer markets.

Competition and Market Dynamics
The antidepressant market is mature, with major players including Pfizer’s Zoloft, Eli Lilly’s Prozac, and generic brands. PAXIL faces stiff competition from established generics, which typically cost 10–20% of branded prices. Newer drugs like vortioxetine or esketamine target treatment-resistant depression or specific symptom clusters but lack the broad revenue base PAXIL once commanded.

R&D and Lifecycle Outlook
No recent new chemical entity development for paroxetine is publicly announced. R&D investments for PAXIL-specific innovations are minimal. Future revenues depend on market share retention in existing indications, off-label use, or niche applications.

Financial Fundamentals and Investment Risks

  • Revenue Stability: Post-patent decline limits revenue; GSK's net sales for PAXIL fell sharply post-2014. Investments in related branding or niche indications may sustain minimal revenues.
  • Profit Margins: Highly dependent on generic pricing trends; margins are thin due to price erosion.
  • Patent Strategy: Use of secondary patents is limited, with patent cliffs now fully realized.
  • Regulatory Risks: Generic market entries are unaffected by regulatory hurdles; risks lie in regulatory changes affecting approvals or pricing policies.

Investment Scenario
Considering the current market environment, direct investment in PAXIL itself is unlikely to generate significant returns due to patent expiry and generic competition. However, investment in GSK’s pipeline or related biosimilars and niche formulations could indirectly benefit from PAXIL's market footprint. Value might also exist in licensing or acquisition scenarios targeting legacy products with residual market shares.

Key Considerations for Investors

  • Focus on companies with existing blockbuster antidepressants or expanding portfolios.
  • Seek opportunities where patents or formulations protect niche markets.
  • Monitor regulatory trends influencing generic pricing and market access.
  • Beware of declining revenues and narrow profit margins on legacy drugs.

Key Takeaways

  • PAXIL’s patent expiration led to significant revenue decline and expanded generic penetration.
  • No active development or new formulations signal long-term revenue erosion.
  • Market competition primarily from generics constrains profitability.
  • Investment value lies in related pipeline assets or licensing opportunities.
  • Regulatory and policy shifts may influence future market access and pricing.

FAQs

1. Is PAXIL still commercially viable?
Direct sales have diminished significantly due to generic competition. Only niche markets or formulations with patent protections retain some value.

2. Are there ongoing lawsuits or patent disputes related to PAXIL?
Most patent disputes concluded by 2014. No major litigations currently target PAXIL as a branded product.

3. Can new indications or formulations revive PAXIL’s revenue?
Limited prospects exist due to patent expirations and market saturation; most new research involves novel drugs.

4. How does GSK’s strategy impact PAXIL’s valuation?
GSK has moved focus toward innovative biopharmaceuticals, reducing reliance on legacy drugs like PAXIL.

5. What valuation metrics are relevant?
Given its legacy status, PAXIL’s valuation hinges on residual revenues, licensing prospects, and market share in niche segments rather than growth metrics typical for new drugs.


References

  1. GSK Annual Reports, 2014–2022
  2. FDA and EMA Patent Listings, 2013–2022
  3. IMS Health Data, 2004–2021
  4. MarketWatch, "Antidepressant Market Overview," 2022
  5. IQVIA Data, "Generic Drug Penetration," 2023

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.