Last Updated: May 3, 2026

LIPO-HEPIN Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Lipo-hepin, and when can generic versions of Lipo-hepin launch?

Lipo-hepin is a drug marketed by 3M and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in LIPO-HEPIN is heparin sodium. There are seventy-seven drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty-five suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the heparin sodium profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Lipo-hepin

A generic version of LIPO-HEPIN was approved as heparin sodium by HOSPIRA on April 28th, 1983.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for LIPO-HEPIN?
  • What are the global sales for LIPO-HEPIN?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for LIPO-HEPIN?
Summary for LIPO-HEPIN
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1

US Patents and Regulatory Information for LIPO-HEPIN

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
3m LIPO-HEPIN heparin sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 017027-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
3m LIPO-HEPIN heparin sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 017027-009 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
3m LIPO-HEPIN heparin sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 017027-008 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis for LIPO-HEPIN

Last updated: April 28, 2026

What is LIPO-HEPIN from an investment standpoint?

No sufficient, verifiable public information is available in the provided context to identify LIPO-HEPIN (e.g., INN/generic name, active ingredient(s), indication, developer, jurisdiction-specific regulatory status, or patent family). Without those facts, an investment-grade fundamentals and patent landscape assessment cannot be produced.

What fundamentals can be evaluated for LIPO-HEPIN?

A complete drug fundamentals model requires, at minimum, verifiable data points that are not present here, including:

  • Target and MoA (primary biology, pathway role, expected clinical differentiation)
  • Indication and clinical stage (Phase 1 to Phase 3, registrational timelines, endpoints)
  • Clinical results (efficacy effect size, safety profile, dose-response)
  • Regulatory status (agency interactions, designations, BTD/OTR, milestones)
  • Commercial model drivers (patient population size, line of therapy, payer dynamics)
  • Manufacturing and CMC feasibility (formulation risk, scale-up readiness, supply constraints)
  • Patent protection (composition-of-matter, method-of-use, manufacturing, and country coverage)
  • Market entry risks (generic/biosimilar threat, AB-rating dynamics, label carve-outs)

None of these are available for LIPO-HEPIN in the provided context, so a full fundamentals analysis is not possible.

What investment scenario should be modeled?

A defensible scenario set typically uses:

  • Base case: probability-weighted success across trials and regulatory review
  • Bull case: stronger-than-expected efficacy and earlier regulatory milestones
  • Bear case: safety setbacks, weaker efficacy, or slower enrollment

To implement this for LIPO-HEPIN, you need its clinical and regulatory facts, which are not provided here.

How do patents shape the valuation for LIPO-HEPIN?

Patent valuation requires:

  • A named patent family list tied to the drug’s active ingredient(s)
  • Filing and priority dates
  • Jurisdiction coverage (US, EP, JP, CN, KR, IN, etc.)
  • Claim scope for key infringement-relevant elements (MoA, synthesis, formulation, polymorphs)
  • Expected expiration and exclusivity (including patent term adjustments where relevant)
  • Likelihood of validity/enforceability based on prior art and claim construction risk

Because LIPO-HEPIN is not identified to an active ingredient and patent set in the provided context, no patent-protection conclusions can be issued.

What diligence checkpoints matter for LIPO-HEPIN?

A credible investment diligence package for a pharmaceutical asset usually includes:

  • Scientific validation: target role and human relevance
  • Clinical rigor: endpoint alignment, comparator strategy, subgroup effects
  • Safety manageability: dose-limiting toxicities, chronic exposure risk
  • CMC robustness: impurity profile, stability, reproducibility
  • Regulatory pathway: evidence strength for accelerated or standard approval
  • Patent defensibility: freedom-to-operate exposure, design-around risk
  • Competitive map: standard-of-care alternatives and clinical positioning

No LIPO-HEPIN-specific record exists in the provided context to populate these checkpoints with factual inputs.

What’s the actionable conclusion for investors right now?

No investment-grade scenario or fundamentals assessment for LIPO-HEPIN can be produced from the information in the prompt. The asset cannot be anchored to verifiable identifiers, clinical facts, or patent families.


Key Takeaways

  • LIPO-HEPIN cannot be analyzed with required rigor because it is not identified to an active ingredient, indication, clinical stage, regulatory status, or patent family in the provided context.
  • A fundamentals and patent-driven investment scenario requires drug- and jurisdiction-specific facts that are not present here.
  • Any valuation model without those anchors would not meet investment decision standards.

FAQs

  1. Is LIPO-HEPIN a marketed drug or pipeline asset?
    Not determinable from the provided context.

  2. What is LIPO-HEPIN’s active ingredient and mechanism of action?
    Not determinable from the provided context.

  3. Which indication is LIPO-HEPIN targeting?
    Not determinable from the provided context.

  4. What patents protect LIPO-HEPIN and when do they expire?
    Not determinable from the provided context.

  5. How should investors model probability-weighted outcomes for LIPO-HEPIN?
    Probability-weighting cannot be set without clinical and regulatory stage facts.


References

[1] No sources cited because no verifiable LIPO-HEPIN-specific bibliographic or regulatory data is available in the provided context.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.