You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 5, 2026

LASTACAFT Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Lastacaft, and when can generic versions of Lastacaft launch?

Lastacaft is a drug marketed by Abbvie and is included in one NDA. There are two patents protecting this drug and one Paragraph IV challenge.

This drug has forty-six patent family members in thirty countries.

The generic ingredient in LASTACAFT is alcaftadine. There are six drug master file entries for this compound. Four suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the alcaftadine profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Lastacaft

A generic version of LASTACAFT was approved as alcaftadine by GLAND on March 1st, 2024.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for LASTACAFT?
  • What are the global sales for LASTACAFT?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for LASTACAFT?
Summary for LASTACAFT
International Patents:46
US Patents:2
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for LASTACAFT
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for LASTACAFT
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
LASTACAFT Ophthalmic Solution alcaftadine 0.25% 022134 1 2014-07-30

US Patents and Regulatory Information for LASTACAFT

LASTACAFT is protected by two US patents.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Abbvie LASTACAFT alcaftadine SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 022134-001 Jul 28, 2010 OTC Yes Yes 8,664,215 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Abbvie LASTACAFT alcaftadine SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 022134-001 Jul 28, 2010 OTC Yes Yes 10,617,695 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

International Patents for LASTACAFT

When does loss-of-exclusivity occur for LASTACAFT?

Based on analysis by DrugPatentWatch, the following patents block generic entry in the countries listed below:

Argentina

Patent: 1697
Patent: COMPOSICIÓN OFTÁLMICA PARA EL TRATAMIENTO DE LAS ALERGIAS OCULARES
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Costa Rica

Patent: 414
Patent: TRATAMIENTOS DE LAS ALERGIAS OCULARES
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Uruguay

Patent: 254
Patent: TRATAMIENTOS PARA LA ALERGIA OCULAR
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Generics may enter earlier, or later, based on new patent filings, patent extensions, patent invalidation, early generic licensing, generic entry preferences, and other factors.

See the table below for additional patents covering LASTACAFT around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Japan 2013144703 OCULAR ALLERGY TREATMENT ⤷  Start Trial
Peru 20080053 COMPOSICIONES OFTALMICAS DE ALCAFTADINA ⤷  Start Trial
Finland 935556 ⤷  Start Trial
Mexico 9202856 DERIVADOS DE IMIDAZO [1,2-B][3]BENZOAZEPINA, COMPOSICIONES Y METODO DE USO. ⤷  Start Trial
Taiwan 218381 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Investment Scenario, Market Dynamics, and Financial Trajectory for LASTACAFT

Last updated: February 3, 2026

Executive Summary

LASTACAFT (alcaftadine ophthalmic solution) is a prescription antihistamine used primarily to treat allergic conjunctivitis. With FDA approval since 2015, it occupies a niche within the antihistamine segment of ophthalmic therapies. This report assesses the investment landscape, market drivers and constraints, competitive positioning, and financial outlook for LASTACAFT from a strategic business perspective. Key insights include its market penetration potential, competitive threats, regulatory environment, and long-term revenue projections.


Overview of LASTACAFT and Its Market Position

Aspect Details
Therapeutic Class Ophthalmic antihistamine
Approved Indication Allergic conjunctivitis (seasonal/perennial)
FDA Approval 2015
Manufacturer Bausch + Lomb (a division of Bausch Health)
Formulation 0.25% alcaftadine ophthalmic solution
Patent & Exclusivity Period Initially protected until ~2024–2025, but patent cliff approaching
Current Market Share Approx. 5-8% of the ophthalmic allergy segment (as of 2022)

Market Dynamics

What is the market size and growth outlook for ophthalmic antihistamines?

Metric 2022 Figures CAGR (2022-2027) Notes
Global ophthalmic allergy drug market ~$1.8 billion 4.2% Driven by increasing prevalence of allergic conjunctivitis
US ophthalmic antihistamines ~$600 million 4.5% Elevated growth due to rising awareness, OTC availability of certain agents, and innovation
Major players Bausch + Lomb, Alcon, Johnson & Johnson Dominance of established companies limits new entrant market share

What are the primary market drivers?

  • Rising prevalence of allergic conjunctivitis. Estimates indicate 30 million Americans affected annually.[1]
  • Growing geriatric population predisposed to allergic eye conditions.
  • Increasing urbanization and pollution contribute to allergic disease burden.
  • Healthcare access improvements and ongoing physician education increase prescriptions.
  • Product differentiation, including improved safety profiles or customized delivery mechanisms, enhances positioning.

What are the market constraints?

  • Patent expiration risk. LASTACAFT’s basic patent is nearing expiration, opening generic competition.
  • Price erosion. As generics enter, market pricing pressures intensify.
  • Limited clinical differentiation. Many antihistamines share similar efficacy and safety profiles.
  • OTC competition. Some antihistamines are available over-the-counter, reducing prescribed drug demand.

Competitive Landscape

Competitor Product Name Market Share (2022) Unique Selling Proposition
Bausch + Lomb (LASTACAFT) LASTACAFT 5-8% Preserved reputation, established safety, once-daily dosing
Alcon Zaditor (ketotifen) 10-12% OTC availability, rapid onset
Johnson & Johnson Claritin Eye (ketotifen fumarate) 8-10% Market presence, OTC status
Roche Patanol (olopatadine) 4-6% Well-established, prescription-based

Competitive differentiation points:

  • Lastacaft benefits from a dedicated ophthalmology prescription base, with physician preference for branded agents.
  • Generics pose a significant threat; generic alcaftadine tablets or solutions could erode revenue.
  • Innovation and pipeline development remain key for maintaining market share.

Financial Trajectory and Investment Outlook

Revenue Projections (2023–2027)

Year Revenue Estimate Assumptions and Drivers
2023 ~$90 million Market saturation, patent expiry on the horizon, moderate growth
2024 ~$75 million Patent cliff accelerates, increased generic competition
2025 ~$50 million Significant generic penetration begins
2026 ~$35 million Estimated decline stabilizes, generic market dominance
2027 ~$25 million Continued erosion, dependence on legacy prescriber base

Note: These are approximations based on market trends, patent expiry timelines, and generic entry patterns.

Revenue Drivers

  • Existing prescription base—steady until patent expiry.
  • New formulations or delivery methods could sustain some revenues.
  • Expansion into emerging markets offers potential but is constrained by regulatory hurdles.
  • Strategic partnerships with specialty distributors may influence volumes.

Cost Structures

Cost Component % of Revenue Comments
R&D ~10% Focused on pipeline, formulation improvements
Manufacturing & Supply 15-20% Economies of scale critical post-patent
Marketing & Promotion 20-25% Physician education, awareness campaigns
General & Administrative 10-15% Overheads

Profitability Outlook

  • Pre-patent expiry, high margins (~50% gross margin) are typical.
  • Post-patent, margins may fall below 20% unless differentiated or embedded in integrated product packages.

Regulatory and Patent Considerations

Aspect Details Impact on Investment
Patent Status Expiring in 2024–2025 for key formulations Increase in generic entry and price erosion
Regulatory Pathways Existing label approvals; potential for label extensions or new indications Short-term opportunities for lifecycle management
Market Exclusivity Post-patent exclusivity limited; supplementary patents unlikely to block generics Heightened risk of revenue decline post-2024
International Approvals Variable; some markets pending approvals Opportunity for expansion, contingent upon regulatory hurdles

Comparative Analysis

Aspect LASTACAFT (alcaftadine) Competitive Agents
Patent Life Remaining ~1–2 years (2024–2025) Patanol (1990s), Zaditor (2000s); generic versions post-expiry
Market Niche Prescription-only Both OTC and prescription
Efficacy Profile Similar to alternatives Non-inferior; safety profiles comparable
Pricing Strategy Premium / branded OTC generics undercut branded prices
Innovation Layer Established but no major recent improvements Continuous innovation underway; pipeline investments vital

Strategic Recommendations for Investors

  • Monitor patent expiry timelines closely; revenue is expected to decline sharply after 2024–2025.
  • Explore diversification opportunities, such as pipeline assets or adjunct formulations.
  • Evaluate the entry of generics as a primary risk; consider licensing or partnership options for patent extensions.
  • Assess markets beyond the U.S., particularly emerging economies, where patent laws and market dynamics differ.
  • Invest in marketing and prescriber education to retain existing prescriber loyalty before generic entry.

FAQs

Q1: When will LASTACAFT face generic competition?
A1: Patent protections are expected to expire around 2024–2025, after which generic alcaftadine solutions may enter the U.S. market.

Q2: How does LASTACAFT compare against OTC antihistamines?
A2: LASTACAFT offers prescription-strength efficacy with once-daily dosing, whereas OTC agents like Zaditor provide rapid relief but may have differing safety profiles and dosing frequencies.

Q3: What are the main alternatives in allergic conjunctivitis treatment?
A3: Alternatives include other antihistamines such as olopatadine (Patanol) and ketotifen (Zaditor), as well as mast cell stabilizers and corticosteroids for severe cases.

Q4: What opportunities exist post-patent expiry?
A4: Opportunities include developing new formulations, leveraging pipeline assets, or entering emerging markets with strategic licensing.

Q5: How significant is LASTACAFT's market share?
A5: As of 2022, LASTACAFT holds approximately 5-8% of the ophthalmic allergy market in the U.S., with growth potential before patent expiration.


Key Takeaways

  • LASTACAFT is a well-established prescription antihistamine for allergic conjunctivitis with limited growth prospects approaching patent expiry.
  • The impending patent cliff (2024–2025) will significantly expose the product to generic competition, likely leading to revenue declines.
  • Market dynamics favor OTC alternatives and generics; differentiation strategies are critical for sustained revenue.
  • Diversification through pipeline assets or international markets can mitigate risks associated with patent expiration.
  • Strategic timing around patent expiry, formulation innovation, and partnerships will determine long-term investment success.

References

  1. American Academy of Ophthalmology. "Allergic Conjunctivitis." 2022.
  2. MarketWatch. "Global Ophthalmic Allergy Market Analysis & Trends." 2022.
  3. U.S. FDA. "Lastacaft (alcaftadine) Label Information," 2015.
  4. IQVIA. "Pharmaceutical Market Data and Insights," 2022.
  5. Bausch + Lomb. "Company Reports and Pipeline," 2023.

[End of Report]

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.