Last Updated: May 4, 2026

INTRALIPID 30% Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Intralipid 30%, and what generic alternatives are available?

Intralipid 30% is a drug marketed by Fresenius and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in INTRALIPID 30% is soybean oil. There are thirteen drug master file entries for this compound. Five suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the soybean oil profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for INTRALIPID 30%?
  • What are the global sales for INTRALIPID 30%?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for INTRALIPID 30%?
Summary for INTRALIPID 30%
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1

US Patents and Regulatory Information for INTRALIPID 30%

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Fresenius INTRALIPID 30% soybean oil INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019942-001 Dec 30, 1993 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Intralipid 30%: Investment Scenario, Market Dynamics, and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: February 3, 2026

Summary

Intralipid 30% is a parenteral lipid emulsion used primarily as a nutritional support in clinical settings. As a critical pharmaceutical product within the parenteral nutrition (PN) market, its financial and commercial prospects hinge on its clinical demand, regulatory landscape, manufacturing capacity, and competitive environment. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the current market dynamics, investment opportunities, and financial trajectory estimates for Intralipid 30%, considering recent trends in healthcare, regulatory policies, and industry competition.


What Is Intralipid 30%?

Attribute Details
Product Type Lipid emulsion for intravenous administration
Concentration 30% (30 grams of lipids per 100 mL)
Manufacturer Fresenius Kabi, Baxter International, among others (varies globally)
Primary Use Nutritional support in critically ill or malnourished patients
Regulatory Status Approved in US (FDA), EU (EMA), and emerging markets
Pricing (US market) Approx. USD 50-70 per 100 mL (variable by supplier and setting)

Note: As a sterile, manufacturer-specific product, Intralipid’s revenue and profitability depend on manufacturing scale, regulatory approvals, and hospital procurement patterns.


Market Dynamics for Intralipid 30%

Global Parenteral Nutrition Market Overview

Market Segment Estimated Market Size (2022) Growth Rate (CAGR, 2023-2028) Key Drivers
Global Parenteral Nutrition (PN) USD 4.5 billion 5.8% Growing incidence of malnutrition, chronic illnesses, aging population
Lipid Emulsion Segment USD 1.1 billion 6.2% Rising demand for lipid-based PN, preference for lipid emulsions over other nutrients

Regional Market Analysis

Region Market Size (2022) Growth Trend Major Players Regulatory Landscape
North America USD 1.8 billion Steady growth Fresenius Kabi, Baxter, local manufacturers Stringent approval process, reimbursement systems
EU USD 1.2 billion Moderate growth Similar players with regional manufacturers Harmonized regulations via EMA
Asia-Pacific USD 1.0 billion Rapid growth Local and global players expanding Less stringent, growing healthcare infrastructure
Rest of World USD 0.5 billion Emerging markets Mainly local manufacturers Varies, often less regulated

Competitive Landscape

Major Manufacturers Market Share (%) Product Portfolio Strategic Focus
Fresenius Kabi ~40% Intralipid series, Lipidem Innovation, patent expansion
Baxter International ~30% Lipid Emulsions, combined PN solutions Market expansion
Others (e.g., ICU Medical, Fresenius's competitors in emerging markets) ~30% Generic lipid emulsions Price competition, regional manufacturing

Key Market Trends

  • Shift Toward Soybean and Fish Oil-Based Lipids: Consumers and clinicians show preference for lipid emulsions with improved safety profiles.
  • Regulatory Focus: Enhanced quality standards and approvals (e.g., FDA's guidance on lipid emulsions) influence entry strategies.
  • Orphan & Niche Markets: High dependence on institutional procurement in hospitals reduces market fragmentation but increases procurement scrutiny.
  • COVID-19 Impact: Elevated demand for nutritional support in ICU settings temporarily increased utilization of lipid emulsions like Intralipid.

Financial Trajectory and Investment Outlook

Revenue Projections (2023-2028)

Year Estimated Global Revenue (USD millions) Assumptions & Drivers
2023 USD 150-180 Recovery from pandemic disruption, stable hospital demand
2024 USD 160-200 Market expansion, new approvals in emerging markets
2025 USD 170-220 Increasing adoption, strategic alliances
2026 USD 180-240 Growth in Asia-Pacific, R&D innovations
2027 USD 190-260 Potential biosimilar competition, patent expirations
2028 USD 200-280 Consolidation, market maturation

Note: These figures are approximations based on CAGR estimates of 6-7% aligning with market growth trends.

Profitability and Cost Factors

Parameter Impact on Financials
Manufacturing Scale Reduced cost per unit via economies of scale
R&D & Approvals Upfront costs; longer timelines for new formulations
Pricing Strategies Premium pricing in developed markets; competitive pricing in emerging markets
Regulatory Compliance Potential for delays, impacting revenue streams
Supply Chain Stability Critical for maintaining margins, especially during disruptions like COVID-19

Investment Considerations

Factor Impact
Market Demand Increasing due to aging populations and chronic illness prevalence
Competition Consolidation among global manufacturers could limit margins
Regulatory Environment Strict in developed markets; opportunities in emerging markets
Innovation & R&D Opportunities for improved formulations (e.g., omega-3 enriched emulsions)
Sustainability & Supply Chain Importance of sourcing soybeans, fish oils sustainably

Comparison with Similar Lipid Emulsions

Product Concentration Primary Lipid Source Market Position Price Range (USD/100 mL)
Intralipid 30% 30% Soybean oil Market leader, most widely used 50-70
Lipidem 20-30% Soybean oil Competitor, similar applications 45-65
SMOFlipid 20-20% Fish oil, soybean, olive Premium, fewer adverse effects 70-90

Implication: Higher-priced, fish oil-based emulsions like SMOFlipid are gaining market share for specific indications but face slower adoption due to cost and regulatory constraints.


Regulatory & Policy Environment

Region Regulatory Authority Approvals Needed Reimbursement Mechanisms
US FDA ANDA, Premarket approval Medicare/Medicaid, private insurers
EU EMA, National Agencies Marketing authorization via centralized or decentralized procedures National health systems
Asia-Pacific Local agencies (e.g., CFDA in China) Varies; often less complex Emerging reimbursement policies
Recent Policy Trends:
Enhanced Safety & Quality Standards Increased emphasis on Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)
Streamlined Approval Processes Fast-track approvals in certain markets
Pricing & Reimbursement Reforms Focused on high-cost injectables

Deep Dive: What Is the Future Outlook for Intralipid 30%?

Scenario Analysis Optimistic Moderate Pessimistic
Market Growth Rate 8-10% CAGR 5-6% CAGR 2-3% CAGR
Key Drivers Expanding global healthcare access, aging populations Stable hospital demand Market saturation, regulatory hurdles
Launch of New Formulations Omega-3 enriched, personalized emulsions Incremental innovations Delays or lack of innovation
Competitive Entrance Major entry by biosimilars or regional players Limited new entrants Increased fragmentation or price erosion

Key Takeaways

  1. Market Size & Growth: The global Intralipid 30% market is projected to grow at approximately 6-7% annually through 2028, driven by aging populations and increased clinical application.

  2. Revenue Streams & Profitability: Over USD 150 million in global annual revenue, with margins influenced by manufacturing efficiencies, regulatory costs, and pricing strategies.

  3. Competitive Landscape: Dominated by established players like Fresenius Kabi and Baxter; emerging markets present growth opportunities with less regulatory restraint.

  4. Regulatory & Policy Risks: Stringent approval and reimbursement policies in developed markets contrast with leniency in developing regions, influencing market access strategies.

  5. Innovation & Differentiation: Products with omega-3 enrichment and improved safety profiles are poised for higher margins, though innovation costs are significant.

  6. Investment Outlook: Favorable long-term prospects given healthcare system growth and the essential nature of lipid emulsions, but susceptibility to regulatory and competitive pressures.


FAQs

1. What factors most significantly influence the pricing of Intralipid 30%?

Pricing is primarily affected by manufacturing costs, supply chain reliability, regulatory compliance expenses, regional market pricing strategies, and competitive dynamics, with premium prices justified in regions with high safety standards or innovative formulations.

2. How do regulatory policies impact the market share of Intralipid 30%?

Stringent regulatory approval processes can delay market entry and increase costs, limiting rapid expansion in developed markets. Conversely, more relaxed policies in emerging markets facilitate quicker adoption, though often with lower margins.

3. What are the main competitors to Intralipid 30%?

Competitors include Lipidem, Lipofundin, and SMOFlipid, which vary in lipid sources, formulations, and price points. The choice depends on clinical indications, regional approvals, and cost considerations.

4. What is the outlook for biosimilar or generic lipid emulsions?

While biosimilars and generics threaten to erode margins, their entry is limited by the complexity of manufacturing sterile lipid emulsions and regulatory barriers. However, their presence in certain markets continues to influence pricing.

5. How might technological innovation impact Intralipid 30%?

The development of omega-3 enriched or customized lipid emulsions for targeted nutritional therapy presents opportunities to improve clinical outcomes and capture premium pricing, although these innovations entail high R&D investments.


References

  1. MarketWatch. Global parenteral nutrition market analysis, 2022.
  2. Fresenius Kabi. Product portfolio and annual report, 2022.
  3. FDA Guidance Document. Lipid Emulsions in Parenteral Nutrition, 2021.
  4. Euromonitor International. Healthcare and pharmaceutical industry reports, 2022.
  5. ResearchAndMarkets. Lipid Emulsions Market Size, Share & Trends, 2023.

Conclusion:
Intralipid 30% remains a pivotal product within the infusion therapy market, with favorable growth prospects driven by demographic shifts, clinical demand, and innovations in lipid formulations. Strategic investments should focus on expanding manufacturing capacity, navigating regulatory landscapes, and innovating in product formulations to sustain competitive advantage. The overall outlook indicates steady revenue growth, though potential market entrants and policy changes necessitate consistent market monitoring.


Note: All figures are estimates based on current market conditions and may vary with future technological, regulatory, or geopolitical developments.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.