You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 19, 2026

FOSINOPRIL SODIUM Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Fosinopril Sodium, and what generic alternatives are available?

Fosinopril Sodium is a drug marketed by Actavis Labs Fl Inc, Apotex, Aurobindo Pharma Ltd, Chartwell Rx, Invagen Pharms, Prinston Inc, Ranbaxy Labs Ltd, Teva, Upsher Smith Labs, Watson Labs, Ani Pharms, Aurobindo Pharma, Mylan, Sandoz, and Sun Pharm Inds Ltd. and is included in twenty NDAs.

The generic ingredient in FOSINOPRIL SODIUM is fosinopril sodium; hydrochlorothiazide. There are six drug master file entries for this compound. Two suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the fosinopril sodium; hydrochlorothiazide profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for FOSINOPRIL SODIUM?
  • What are the global sales for FOSINOPRIL SODIUM?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for FOSINOPRIL SODIUM?
Summary for FOSINOPRIL SODIUM
US Patents:0
Applicants:15
NDAs:20

US Patents and Regulatory Information for FOSINOPRIL SODIUM

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Chartwell Rx FOSINOPRIL SODIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE fosinopril sodium; hydrochlorothiazide TABLET;ORAL 079025-002 Sep 17, 2010 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Watson Labs FOSINOPRIL SODIUM fosinopril sodium TABLET;ORAL 076987-003 Dec 23, 2004 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Sun Pharm Inds Ltd FOSINOPRIL SODIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE fosinopril sodium; hydrochlorothiazide TABLET;ORAL 076739-002 Dec 17, 2004 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Mylan FOSINOPRIL SODIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE fosinopril sodium; hydrochlorothiazide TABLET;ORAL 077705-002 Aug 14, 2006 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Teva FOSINOPRIL SODIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE fosinopril sodium; hydrochlorothiazide TABLET;ORAL 076945-001 Jul 5, 2006 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Watson Labs FOSINOPRIL SODIUM fosinopril sodium TABLET;ORAL 076987-001 Dec 23, 2004 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Watson Labs FOSINOPRIL SODIUM fosinopril sodium TABLET;ORAL 077531-003 Aug 31, 2006 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Fosinopril Sodium: Patent Landscape and Investment Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Fosinopril sodium, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, presents a mature market with established generics. Investment considerations are centered on the remaining patent exclusivity for specific formulations or indications, manufacturing efficiencies, and potential lifecycle management strategies. The primary market competition comes from other ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs).

What is the current patent status of Fosinopril Sodium?

The original patents for fosinopril sodium have expired. However, secondary patents relating to specific crystalline forms, manufacturing processes, and extended-release formulations may still offer periods of exclusivity. These secondary patents are crucial for determining any remaining market protection for branded or generic manufacturers seeking to differentiate their products or extend their market life.

As of the latest available data, the primary composition of matter patent for fosinopril sodium has long since expired. For instance, the original U.S. patent [1] has been expired for over two decades. However, the patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is complex and often involves multiple patents covering different aspects of a drug. These can include:

  • Method of Use Patents: Patents covering new therapeutic indications or specific patient populations.
  • Formulation Patents: Patents protecting novel drug delivery systems, such as extended-release or combination formulations.
  • Process Patents: Patents on improved or novel manufacturing methods.
  • Polymorph Patents: Patents covering specific crystalline forms of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), which can affect stability, bioavailability, and manufacturing ease.

While a comprehensive, real-time patent search is required for definitive analysis, publicly accessible databases indicate that the core patent protection for fosinopril sodium has lapsed. Generic competition is therefore significant. Any remaining patent exclusivity is likely tied to specific, innovative advancements on the basic compound.

Who are the major players and competitors in the Fosinopril Sodium market?

The market for fosinopril sodium is characterized by a mix of originator companies that may still hold certain secondary patents or market authorizations, and a substantial number of generic manufacturers. Key competitors include global pharmaceutical companies and specialized generic producers.

Major generic players actively marketing fosinopril sodium include, but are not limited to:

  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Mylan N.V. (now part of Viatris)
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.
  • Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
  • Lupin Ltd.

These companies compete primarily on price and supply chain reliability. The presence of numerous generic manufacturers suggests a highly competitive pricing environment.

The therapeutic class competition is also significant, with other ACE inhibitors and ARBs capturing market share. Key competing drug classes and examples include:

  • Other ACE Inhibitors:
    • Lisinopril (e.g., Zestril, Prinivil)
    • Enalapril (e.g., Vasotec)
    • Ramipril (e.g., Altace)
    • Benazepril (e.g., Lotensin)
  • Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs):
    • Losartan (e.g., Cozaar)
    • Valsartan (e.g., Diovan)
    • Olmesartan (e.g., Benicar)
    • Telmisartan (e.g., Micardis)

The choice between fosinopril sodium and these alternatives is often influenced by physician preference, patient tolerability, cost, and specific co-morbidities.

What are the market dynamics and market size for Fosinopril Sodium?

Fosinopril sodium is a mature drug in the cardiovascular therapeutic area, specifically for hypertension and heart failure. The market size is influenced by the prevalence of these conditions, prescribing patterns, and the availability of generic alternatives.

The global market for ACE inhibitors, which includes fosinopril sodium, is substantial but has experienced moderate growth due to the availability of generics and the introduction of newer drug classes. Precise figures for fosinopril sodium alone are difficult to isolate from broader ACE inhibitor market data due to genericization and the widespread availability of multiple therapeutic options.

However, the broader antihypertensive market is valued in the tens of billions of dollars annually. Within this, ACE inhibitors constitute a significant segment, estimated to be in the billions. Fosinopril sodium's market share is a fraction of this, dictated by its efficacy, safety profile, and cost-effectiveness relative to competitors.

Market dynamics include:

  • Price Erosion: Intense price competition among generic manufacturers leads to significant price erosion for the drug.
  • Physician Prescribing Habits: Prescribing is influenced by established clinical trial data, long-term safety records, and physician familiarity with the drug.
  • Formulary Access: Inclusion on insurance company formularies significantly impacts prescription volume.
  • Patient Adherence: The effectiveness of treatment for chronic conditions like hypertension relies heavily on patient adherence.

While specific recent market size data for fosinopril sodium is proprietary and not publicly disclosed by most generic manufacturers, industry reports on the antihypertensive market indicate a stable to slightly declining demand for older generation ACE inhibitors as newer agents and combination therapies gain traction.

What are the manufacturing and supply chain considerations for Fosinopril Sodium?

Manufacturing fosinopril sodium involves multi-step chemical synthesis. Key considerations for manufacturers include API sourcing, process optimization for yield and purity, adherence to stringent Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) regulations, and robust supply chain management to ensure consistent availability.

The manufacturing process typically involves several chemical reactions to synthesize the fosinopril intermediate and then convert it to the sodium salt. Key raw materials and intermediates must be sourced from reliable suppliers, often requiring pre-qualification and ongoing quality audits.

Critical manufacturing aspects include:

  • API Synthesis and Purity: Achieving high purity of the fosinopril sodium API is essential to meet regulatory standards and ensure patient safety. Impurities can arise from incomplete reactions, side reactions, or degradation.
  • Crystalline Form Control: If a specific polymorph offers advantages, controlling its formation during crystallization is crucial and can be a subject of secondary patent protection.
  • Scale-Up Efficiency: Developing a cost-effective manufacturing process that can be scaled from laboratory to commercial production volumes.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Adherence to GMP guidelines set by regulatory bodies like the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration), EMA (European Medicines Agency), and others is mandatory. This includes stringent quality control and assurance measures at every stage.
  • Supply Chain Security: Establishing a resilient supply chain to prevent shortages, manage raw material price volatility, and ensure timely delivery of finished products to markets worldwide. This involves managing logistics, inventory, and potential geopolitical risks.

Companies with highly efficient, vertically integrated manufacturing operations or those that have secured favorable long-term contracts for key raw materials may have a competitive cost advantage.

What are the regulatory hurdles and requirements for Fosinopril Sodium?

Fosinopril sodium, like all pharmaceutical products, is subject to rigorous regulatory oversight throughout its lifecycle, from manufacturing to marketing and post-market surveillance.

Key regulatory hurdles and requirements include:

  • Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) Approval: Generic manufacturers must demonstrate bioequivalence to the reference listed drug (RLD) through an ANDA. This involves submitting extensive data on chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC), as well as bioequivalence studies.
  • Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP): Manufacturing facilities must comply with GMP regulations. Regulatory agencies conduct periodic inspections to ensure ongoing compliance. Deviations can lead to warning letters, import alerts, or product recalls.
  • Pharmacovigilance: Manufacturers are responsible for monitoring and reporting adverse events associated with their products. This includes establishing a robust pharmacovigilance system.
  • Labeling Requirements: Product labeling must comply with regulatory agency requirements, including prescribing information, patient information leaflets, and warnings. Any changes to labeling must be approved by the regulatory authority.
  • Patent Certifications (Paragraph IV): For generic drug approval in the U.S., companies must submit a certification regarding the patent status of the RLD. A Paragraph IV certification alleges that the relevant patents are invalid, unenforceable, or will not be infringed by the generic product, potentially triggering patent litigation.
  • Post-Approval Changes: Any significant changes to the manufacturing process, formulation, or manufacturing site require regulatory notification or approval.

The regulatory landscape is dynamic, with evolving requirements for drug quality, safety, and efficacy. Staying abreast of these changes and maintaining a high level of compliance is essential for sustained market access.

What are the potential investment opportunities and risks associated with Fosinopril Sodium?

Investment opportunities in fosinopril sodium are primarily found in generic manufacturing, particularly for companies that can achieve significant cost efficiencies, secure long-term supply contracts, or develop differentiated formulations. Risks are considerable due to intense competition and price erosion.

Investment Opportunities:

  • Cost-Efficient Manufacturing: Companies with optimized manufacturing processes, access to low-cost raw materials, and economies of scale can achieve lower production costs, enabling competitive pricing and potentially higher profit margins.
  • Supply Chain Dominance: Establishing a reliable and efficient global supply chain can secure market share and customer loyalty, especially for large tenders or institutional contracts.
  • Emerging Markets Expansion: Targeting markets with growing demand for affordable cardiovascular medications, where generic fosinopril sodium can offer a vital treatment option.
  • Lifecycle Management (Limited): While challenging for a genericized drug, exploring patentable reformulations (e.g., fixed-dose combinations with other antihypertensives, novel delivery systems) could create niche market opportunities, although this requires significant R&D investment and is highly speculative.
  • API Manufacturing: Companies specializing in API production with expertise in synthesizing fosinopril sodium efficiently can supply multiple finished dosage form manufacturers.

Investment Risks:

  • Intense Generic Competition: The market is saturated with numerous generic manufacturers, leading to aggressive price wars and significant margin compression.
  • Price Erosion: The price of fosinopril sodium has likely fallen substantially since its patent expiration and will continue to be subject to downward pressure.
  • Therapeutic Substitution: The development and adoption of newer antihypertensive agents or combination therapies can reduce the demand for older ACE inhibitors like fosinopril sodium.
  • Regulatory Changes: Evolving regulatory requirements can increase compliance costs and potentially lead to product recalls or market withdrawals if standards are not met.
  • Patent Litigation: If secondary patents are still in play, generic manufacturers may face costly patent litigation, which can delay market entry or result in significant damages.
  • Supply Chain Disruptions: Global supply chain vulnerabilities, geopolitical instability, and natural disasters can impact the availability and cost of raw materials, as well as the distribution of finished products.
  • Limited Differentiation: The lack of significant patent protection for the basic compound makes it difficult to create sustainable differentiation, leading to a commoditized market.

For investors, the primary focus should be on companies with strong operational execution, robust cost controls, and proven ability to navigate highly competitive generic markets. Strategic partnerships or mergers and acquisitions among generic players could also present opportunities for consolidation and efficiency gains.

Key Takeaways

Fosinopril sodium is a mature generic pharmaceutical with expired primary patents, leading to a highly competitive market. Investment opportunities lie in cost-efficient manufacturing, supply chain optimization, and potentially niche market expansion, though significant risks exist due to intense price erosion and therapeutic substitution.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Are there any remaining patents that could prevent generic entry of fosinopril sodium? While the primary composition of matter patent has expired, secondary patents related to specific crystalline forms, manufacturing processes, or novel formulations may exist, potentially influencing the market entry or exclusivity of certain products.

  2. What is the typical profit margin for generic fosinopril sodium manufacturers? Profit margins for generic fosinopril sodium are generally low due to intense price competition. Exact margins vary based on manufacturing efficiency, sourcing costs, and market penetration.

  3. How does fosinopril sodium compare in efficacy and safety to other ACE inhibitors like lisinopril? Clinical studies generally show comparable efficacy and safety profiles among most ACE inhibitors for hypertension and heart failure. Differences often emerge in pharmacokinetic profiles, dosing frequencies, and specific side effect tolerances in individual patients.

  4. What are the key raw materials required for fosinopril sodium synthesis? The synthesis of fosinopril sodium involves several complex chemical intermediates. Key starting materials and reagents vary based on the specific synthetic route employed by a manufacturer.

  5. Could fosinopril sodium be repurposed for new indications? While theoretically possible, repurposing a generic drug like fosinopril sodium for a new indication requires substantial investment in clinical trials to demonstrate efficacy and safety for the new use. The economic viability of such an endeavor is often questionable without strong secondary patent protection for the new indication.

Citations

[1] U.S. Patent No. 4,374,981 (filed Jan. 1, 1980).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.