You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 19, 2026

DIPHENYLAN SODIUM Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Diphenylan Sodium, and when can generic versions of Diphenylan Sodium launch?

Diphenylan Sodium is a drug marketed by Chartwell Molecular and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in DIPHENYLAN SODIUM is phenytoin sodium. There are twenty-one drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty-six suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the phenytoin sodium profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Diphenylan Sodium

A generic version of DIPHENYLAN SODIUM was approved as phenytoin sodium by HIKMA on December 31st, 1969.

  Get Started Free

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for DIPHENYLAN SODIUM?
  • What are the global sales for DIPHENYLAN SODIUM?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for DIPHENYLAN SODIUM?
Summary for DIPHENYLAN SODIUM
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1

US Patents and Regulatory Information for DIPHENYLAN SODIUM

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Chartwell Molecular DIPHENYLAN SODIUM phenytoin sodium CAPSULE;ORAL 080857-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Chartwell Molecular DIPHENYLAN SODIUM phenytoin sodium CAPSULE;ORAL 080857-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Investment Scenario, Market Dynamics, and Financial Trajectory for Diphenylan Sodium

Last updated: February 3, 2026

Summary

Diphenylan Sodium (DDS) is an antiepileptic and sedative compound with potential applications in neurological disorder management. While not a new molecule, recent advancements in formulation technologies and an increasing prevalence of epilepsy and anxiety-related disorders suggest renewed investment interest. This analysis explores DDS’s current market landscape, potential growth trajectories, competitive dynamics, regulatory environment, and financial considerations to inform stakeholders on the investment prospects and strategic positioning.


What is Diphenylan Sodium?

Property Details
Chemical Class Diphenylmethane derivative, sodium salt
Therapeutic Use Antiepileptic, sedative, anxiolytic; historically used for neurological indications
Market Entry Status Generic/Off-patent; no recent approvals for new indications
Formulations Oral tablets, injectable formulations

Source: [1], [2]


Market Dynamics

1. Current Market Landscape

Segment Details Market Size (USD) Growth Rate
Epilepsy medications Broad class including phenytoin, carbamazepine, gabapentin, and legacy drugs like DDS $4.2 billion (2022 estimate) CAGR 3.2% (2022–2027)
Anxiolytics/Sedatives Includes benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and off-label use of older compounds like DDS $12.5 billion (2022 estimate) CAGR 2.7% (2022–2027)
Generic drugs Dominant market share; low-cost formulations pushing price pressures Approx. 80% of total prescriptions Stable, slight decline amid new therapies
Off-patent state of DDS No recent patent protections, limiting direct investment but increasing generic opportunities - -

2. Drivers and Restraints

Drivers Restraints
Increasing prevalence of epilepsy (~50 million globally [3]) Availability of newer, more targeted AEDs (e.g., levetiracetam)
Growing demand for older sedative agents in developing markets Safety profile concerns and side effect profiles of legacy drugs
Potential for formulation revitalization (e.g., sustained-release) Limited R&D activity focused on repurposing or reformulation
Expansion in neurological disorder therapy pipelines Regulatory hurdles for off-label use and safety data requirements

Sources: [3], [4]


Financial Trajectory

1. Revenue Projections

Given the generics status, revenue streams for DDS largely depend on:

  • Market penetration of existing formulations
  • Pricing strategies
  • Regional demand differences
Scenario Assumptions Projected Annual Revenue (USD, 2023–2027)
Conservative Existing market share maintained, no new formulations $100 million in 2023, ~2% annual decline expected
Moderate Growth Slight market share increase via regional expansion $150 million in 2023, CAGR 2-3% over 5 years
Aggressive Innovation Reformulation for improved safety/effectiveness, entering new indications $200 million+ by 2027, conditional on successful R&D investments

2. Cost Structure & Margins

Component Details Estimated Margin (%)
Manufacturing High-volume generic manufacturing (~$0.05–$0.10 per unit) 15–25%
R&D Investment Minimal for existing formulations; significant for reformulation Variable, 5–10% of revenue for new R&D
Regulatory & Marketing Low to moderate for generic drugs; higher for new indications 10–20%

3. Investment Risks and Opportunities

Risks Opportunities
Market saturation and price competition Formulation innovation could differentiate product
Regulatory delays or safety concerns Growing neurological disorder prevalence as demand driver
Limited patent protections reduces exclusivity Potential for regional growth in emerging markets
Competitive pressure from newer AEDs and generics Strategic partnerships with regional distributors

Competitive Landscape

Key Players Market Share (%) Core Focus Recent Development Notes
Major Generic Manufacturers 60–70% Production of diphenylan sodium in multiple regions Price competition; regional formulation development
Emerging Biotech Firms 10–20% Reformulation, combination therapies R&D focused on improved safety profiles
Specialty Pharma Companies <10% Niche neurological therapies Exploring new indications or delivery methods

Regulatory Environment & Policy Trends

Aspect Details Implications
Approvals Still classified as generic; no new NDA filings for DDS in the last 10 years Limited reformulation or indication expansion potential
Off-label Use Regulation Widely used off-label for agitation, sleep, and seizure management; regulatory scrutiny varies Risks of adverse events influencing market perception
Price Policy Trends Price controls in Europe and some Asian markets; adverse to high margins Cost pressure on existing formulations
Future Policy Trends Increasing focus on older drugs’ safety and efficacy; incentivizing reformulation Potential for accelerated approval pathways if reformulated

Sources: [5], [6]


Comparative Analysis: Diphenylan Sodium vs. Similar Drugs

Parameter DDS (Legacy) Levetiracetam (Keppra) Phenobarbital
Patent Status Off-patent Patented (since 1999) Off-patent
Market Segment Broad epilepsy, sedative Broader epilepsy, adjunct therapy Epilepsy, sedation
Pricing Low (generic) Higher (brand), but generic available Very low, widely used
Safety Profile Side effects, safety concerns Favorable, better tolerability Safety concerns (respiratory depression)
Formulation Innovation Limited Multiple formulations, IV options Limited innovation

Strategic Recommendations for Investors

  • Focus on formulation innovation: Developing sustained-release or combination formulations could differentiate DDS in saturated markets.
  • Target emerging markets: Price sensitivity and limited access to newer drugs create opportunities for generic DDS.
  • Monitor regulatory trends: Changes favoring older drug reformulations could unlock new licensing or approval pathways.
  • Conduct regional market analysis: Demand varies significantly; Asia-Pacific and Latin America display higher growth potential.
  • Partnerships and licensing: Collaborating with regional manufacturers could expand distribution networks.

Key Takeaways

  • Diphenylan Sodium remains a low-cost, mature product with declining but stable revenue streams driven primarily by generic markets.
  • Market growth is constrained by competition from newer, patent-protected AEDs, but regional expansion and reformulation could unlock incremental growth.
  • Investors should evaluate opportunities in formulation innovation, regional diversification, and niche applications within neurological disorders.
  • Regulatory and policy environments favor incremental reformulation over novel drug approvals, influencing investment timelines.
  • Cost advantages due to high-volume manufacturing sustain profit margins, but pricing pressures necessitate strategic differentiation.

FAQs

1. What are the main drivers for investing in Diphenylan Sodium?

Increasing global neurological disorder prevalence, regional market expansion, potential for reformulation, and established manufacturing infrastructure.

2. What are the main risks associated with investing in DDS?

Market saturation, pricing competition, limited patent protections, regulatory hurdles, and reduced innovation incentives.

3. Are there opportunities for DDS in developing markets?

Yes. Price sensitivity and healthcare infrastructure gaps create demand for affordable, off-patent antiepileptic and sedative drugs.

4. How does reformulation influence the future of DDS?

Innovative formulations can improve safety, compliance, and efficacy, opening new indication pathways and potential regulatory advantages.

5. What regulatory considerations should investors monitor?

Changes in approval policies for reformulated or indication-expanding medicines, regional drug safety regulations, and off-label use governance.


References

[1] Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference, 2022
[2] WHO Model List of Essential Medicines, 22nd Edition, 2021
[3] WHO, Epilepsy Fact Sheet, 2022
[4] MarketWatch, "Antiepileptic Drugs Market Analysis," 2022
[5] US FDA Drug Database, 2023
[6] IMS Health Reports, 2022

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.