Last Updated: May 3, 2026

DEXTROSE 5%, SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% AND POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 0.075% Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Dextrose 5%, Sodium Chloride 0.45% And Potassium Chloride 0.075% patents expire, and when can generic versions of Dextrose 5%, Sodium Chloride 0.45% And Potassium Chloride 0.075% launch?

Dextrose 5%, Sodium Chloride 0.45% And Potassium Chloride 0.075% is a drug marketed by B Braun and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in DEXTROSE 5%, SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% AND POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 0.075% is dextrose; potassium chloride; sodium chloride. There are nine drug master file entries for this compound. Four suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the dextrose; potassium chloride; sodium chloride profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for DEXTROSE 5%, SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% AND POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 0.075%?
  • What are the global sales for DEXTROSE 5%, SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% AND POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 0.075%?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for DEXTROSE 5%, SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% AND POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 0.075%?
Summary for DEXTROSE 5%, SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% AND POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 0.075%
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1

US Patents and Regulatory Information for DEXTROSE 5%, SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% AND POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 0.075%

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
B Braun DEXTROSE 5%, SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% AND POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 0.075% dextrose; potassium chloride; sodium chloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 018268-010 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis for DEXTROSE 5%, SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% AND POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 0.075% Solution

Last updated: February 19, 2026

This analysis evaluates the market potential, manufacturing considerations, regulatory environment, competitive landscape, and financial viability of a pharmaceutical infusion solution containing 5% dextrose, 0.45% sodium chloride, and 0.075% potassium chloride.

Market Overview

Industry Size and Growth

  • The global infusion therapy market was valued at approximately $34 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6% through 2028[1].
  • Consumables such as intravenous (IV) fluids account for around 30% of the market, driven by increasing hospitalization rates, chronic disease prevalence, and outpatient therapy expansion.

Key Drivers

  • Rising incidences of dehydration, diabetes, and electrolyte imbalances.
  • Expanding outpatient and emerging markets.
  • Advancements in infusion delivery systems.

Market Segmentation

  • Primary users: Hospitals (60%), outpatient clinics (20%), long-term care facilities (15%), others (5%).
  • Geographical focus: North America (40%), Europe (25%), Asia-Pacific (30%), rest of the world (5%).

Competitive Landscape

  • Major manufacturers: Baxter International, Becton Dickinson, ICU Medical, Fresenius Kabi.
  • Product differentiation primarily via manufacturing scale, quality standards, and integrated medical device offerings.

Product Fundamentals

Composition and Intended Use

The formulation serves as a balanced electrolyte and carbohydrate solution used primarily for:

  • Hydration management.
  • Electrolyte replenishment.
  • Nutritional support.

Manufacturing Considerations

  • Raw Materials: High-grade dextrose, pharmaceutical-grade sodium chloride, potassium chloride.
  • Quality Standards: Must meet USP (United States Pharmacopeia) or EP (European Pharmacopeia) specifications.
  • Sterilization: Autoclaving or filtration processes to ensure sterility.
  • Shelf Life: Typically 24-36 months, limited by stability of electrolytes and dextrose.

Cost Structure

  • Raw materials: 20-30% of unit cost.
  • Manufacturing: 15-20% depending on scale.
  • Packaging: 10-15%.
  • Distribution and logistics: 10-15%.
  • Regulatory compliance and quality assurance: 10%.

Regulatory Environment

Approval Pathways

  • Approved as sterile injectable or infusion solutions.
  • Countries require Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) compliance.
  • US: FDA approval via Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) if generic, or new drug application (NDA) for innovative formulations.
  • Europe: EMA marketing authorization.

Intellectual Property

  • Composition patents unlikely due to standard formulation.
  • Manufacturing process patents may provide competitive edge.

Investment Considerations

Aspect Details Risks/Opportunities
Market Potential Sustained demand driven by healthcare needs High demand stability, but sensitive to healthcare budget constraints
Manufacturing Scale Requires significant capital outlay Economies of scale reduce per-unit cost
Regulatory Hurdles Time and cost of approval Fast-track programs may expedite time-to-market in specific regions
Competition Dominated by few global players Entry barriers are high due to quality requirements and regulatory standards
Price Point Competitive bid-driven pricing Margin compression possible in commoditized segments

Financial Outlook

  • Revenue estimates: Based on annual production volume of 10 million units, average selling price of $0.50 per unit, potential revenue of $5 million/year initially.
  • Profitability: Gross margins of 30-40% feasible, depending on scale and efficiencies.
  • Break-even timeline: 2-3 years, considering regulatory, manufacturing, and market entry costs.

Strategic Risks and Challenges

  • Market saturation by established players.
  • Fluctuations in raw material costs.
  • Regulatory delays impacting time-to-market.
  • Price competition in commoditized segments.

Key Takeaways

  • The infusion formulation addresses a steady demand for hydration and electrolyte therapy.
  • Entry into established markets requires high initial investment and compliance costs.
  • Competitive advantage may be achieved through manufacturing efficiency, quality control, or supply chain integration.
  • Growth opportunities exist in emerging markets and outpatient settings.
  • Financial viability hinges on manufacturing scale and regulatory approval efficiency.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary regulatory hurdles for this infusion solution?
    Compliance with GMP standards, approval via FDA or EMA pathways, and meeting pharmacopeia specifications are primary hurdles.

  2. How does raw material pricing impact profitability?
    Variations in dextrose and electrolyte prices directly affect margins; securing long-term supply contracts mitigates risk.

  3. What is the typical lead time for regulatory approval?
    US FDA approval can take 12-24 months; Europe’s EMA may take similar timelines, influenced by submission quality and review processes.

  4. Is there a significant patent protection for such formulations?
    Standard electrolyte solutions generally lack composition patents; process patents may provide some defensibility.

  5. What market segments hold the most growth potential?
    Outpatient clinics and emerging markets in Asia-Pacific exhibit fastest growth due to expanding healthcare infrastructure.


References

[1] Allied Market Research. (2022). Infusion Therapy Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.