You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 19, 2026

DEXTROSE 10% AND SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.2% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Dextrose 10% And Sodium Chloride 0.2% In Plastic Container patents expire, and when can generic versions of Dextrose 10% And Sodium Chloride 0.2% In Plastic Container launch?

Dextrose 10% And Sodium Chloride 0.2% In Plastic Container is a drug marketed by B Braun and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in DEXTROSE 10% AND SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.2% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER is dextrose; sodium chloride. There are nine drug master file entries for this compound. Five suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the dextrose; sodium chloride profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for DEXTROSE 10% AND SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.2% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What are the global sales for DEXTROSE 10% AND SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.2% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for DEXTROSE 10% AND SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.2% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
Summary for DEXTROSE 10% AND SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.2% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:2

US Patents and Regulatory Information for DEXTROSE 10% AND SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.2% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
B Braun DEXTROSE 10% AND SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.2% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER dextrose; sodium chloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 018386-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
B Braun DEXTROSE 10% AND SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.2% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER dextrose; sodium chloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019631-012 Feb 24, 1988 RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Investment Analysis, Market Dynamics, and Financial Trajectory for Dextrose 10% and Sodium Chloride 0.2% Solution in Plastic Containers

Last updated: February 3, 2026


Summary

This report evaluates the investment potential, market dynamics, and financial outlook of a pharmaceutical product: Dextrose 10% with Sodium Chloride 0.2% in plastic containers. The analysis covers current market size, growth drivers, competitive landscape, regulatory considerations, and projected revenue streams. Further, it addresses technical specifications and operational costs that influence profitability and strategic positioning within the clinical infusion segment.


1. Product Overview and Market Positioning

Composition and Use Cases

Ingredient Concentration Primary Use Indications
Dextrose (Glucose) 10% Electrolyte replenishment; caloric support Dehydration, hypoglycemia, nutritional therapy
Sodium Chloride 0.2% Osmotic balance; electrolyte replacement Fluid management, electrolyte imbalance

Dextrose with Sodium Chloride solutions are commonly used in hospitals and clinics for hydration, nutrition, and electrolyte balance. Their compatibility with intravenous infusion systems renders them staple products with predictable demand.

Market Segmentation

  • Clinical Settings: Hospitals, outpatient clinics, emergency services.
  • Geographic Reach: North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America.
  • End Users: Healthcare providers, clinics, pharmaceutical distributors.

Product Forms & Packaging

  • Container Types: Plastic (PVC, non-PVC), glass, EVA.
  • Container Sizes: 100 mL, 250 mL, 500 mL, 1000 mL.
  • Packaging Trends: Shift towards plastic due to weight, break-resistance, sterilization compatibility.

2. Market Dynamics

Market Size & Growth Potential

  • The global IV fluid market was valued at USD 8.2 billion in 2022[1].
  • CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate): approximately 5.2% (2023-2028)[1].
  • Dextrose 10% + Sodium Chloride 0.2% segment accounts for an estimated 25-30% of the overall IV fluids market.

Key Drivers

Driver Impact
Increasing Prevalence of Chronic Diseases Diabetes, dehydration, surgical needs escalate IV therapy demand
Rising Geriatric Population Greater dependency on IV hydration and nutrition
Hospital Infrastructure Expansion Increased capacity for infusion therapies
Technological Advancements in Packaging Enhanced safety, convenience, and shelf life

Market Challenges

Challenge Mitigation Strategies
Price sensitivity in emerging markets Cost optimization, local manufacturing, volume-driven sales
Regulatory hurdles Early alignment with authorities, robust compliance plans
Competition from generics Differentiation through quality, branding, and distribution networks

Competitive Landscape

Key Players Market Share Estimate Notable Strengths
Baxter International ~20% Global distribution, quality standards
Fresenius Kabi ~15% Cost-efficient manufacturing, broad product portfolio
Hospira (Pfizer) ~10% Innovation in infusion therapies, supply chain resilience
Local/National manufacturers Remaining % Cost advantage, regional focus

3. Regulatory & Quality Considerations

Approval Pathways

Regulatory Agency Requirements Typical Timeline
U.S. FDA (21 CFR Part 201) GMP compliance, stability data, sterilization validation 12-24 months depending on submission strength
EMA (European Medicines Agency) Clinical data, batch consistency, safety profiles 12-20 months
WHO Prequalification Essential medicines standards, bioequivalence evaluations 9-18 months

Manufacturing Standards

  • GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices): Mandatory for export quality.
  • Batch Traceability & Certification: Critical to ensure safety and compliance.
  • Container Safety: Plastic must meet USP, EP, or BP standards for medical use; non-PVC options gain favor.

4. Technical Specifications and Operational Considerations

Product Technicalities

Parameter Specification
Concentration Dextrose 10%, Sodium Chloride 0.2%
Container Material Polyvinyl chloride (PVC), Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA), or non-PVC options
Sterilization Method Ethylene oxide (EO), Gamma irradiation
Shelf Life 24-36 months depending on packaging
Storage Conditions 15-30°C, protected from light

Operational & Supply Chain Costs

Cost Area % of Total Cost Notes
Raw Materials (Dextrose, Saline) 25-35% Bulk procurement reduces costs
Packaging & Containers 15-20% Plastic container manufacturing and sterilization costs
Manufacturing & QA 20-25% GMP compliance, quality testing
Distribution & Logistics 10-15% Cold chain and regional distribution costs
Regulatory & Compliance 5-10% Certification, documentation fees

5. Revenue Projections & Financial Trajectory

Assumptions

  • Market Penetration Rate: 3% of total IV fluid global market over 5 years.
  • Average Price per Container (250 mL): USD 3.50 (targeted regions).
  • Annual Production Capacity: 10 million units.

Revenue Breakdown (Estimated in USD)

Year Units Sold (millions) Revenue (USD millions) Notes
2023 0.3 1.05 Initial launch, early adoption
2024 0.6 2.10 Expansion, increased awareness
2025 1.2 4.20 Market expansion, competitive pricing
2026 2.2 7.70 Broader distribution, potential regional entries
2027 3.0 10.50 Steady state with mature distribution channels

Revenue growth is influenced by market penetration, pricing strategies, and regional expansion plans.

Cost Breakdown & Profitability

Cost Component Estimated % of Revenue Implication
Raw Materials 25% Cost management critical for margin preservation
Manufacturing & QA 20% Efficiency improvements can uplift margins
Marketing & Distribution 15% Needed for brand awareness and geographic expansion
Regulatory & Compliance 5% Sustained compliance adherence costs
Operating Expenses 10% General and administrative costs

Projected Profit Margins

  • Gross Margin: Approx. 55-60%
  • Net Margin: 15-20% (post-operational expenses)

6. Strategic Considerations

Market Entry & Differentiation Strategies

  • Emphasize quality, safety, and stability.
  • Deploy region-specific marketing channels.
  • Optimize supply chain to reduce costs.
  • Leverage strategic partnerships with hospitals and distributors.

Risk Factors & Mitigation

Risk Mitigation
Regulatory delays Early engagement with authorities; comprehensive documentation
Market competition Competitive pricing; quality assurance; differentiated branding
Supply chain disruptions Multiple sourcing; local manufacturing options
Price fluctuations in raw materials Long-term contracts; bulk procurement

7. Comparative Analysis with Similar Products

Parameter Dextrose 10% + Saline 0.2% Dextrose 10% + Sodium Chloride 0.9% Normal Saline (0.9%) RINGER'S Solution
Typical Market Price (USD) 3.50 4.00 3.50 4.50
Shelf Life 24-36 months 24-36 months 24 months 24 months
Container Types Plastic, glass Plastic, glass Plastic, glass Plastic, glass
Main Use Cases Electrolyte/nutrition Electrolyte/nutrition Fluid resuscitation Electrolyte balance

8. Key Regulatory and Policy Environment

Region Policy Highlights Recent Updates
U.S. (FDA) Strict GMP and sterilization standards 2022 updates on Single Use Device Regulation
European (EMA) Batch validation and stability testing New regulations on non-PVC container use
Asia-Pacific Focus on local manufacturing incentives Evolving import-export policies for medical supplies

Conclusion & Investment Outlook

The global demand for IV infusion solutions, especially those balancing safety, efficacy, and affordability, underpins a positive investment outlook for Dextrose 10% + Sodium Chloride 0.2% solutions in plastic containers. With projected CAGR of around 5.2%, steady market penetration, and strong clinical utility, investments in manufacturing, regulatory compliance, and market expansion could yield attractive returns.

Market entry should prioritize compliance, cost management, and differentiation, with strategic partnerships facilitating rapid expansion. The product’s simplicity, critical clinical applications, and packaging advantages position it well in both mature and emerging markets.


Key Takeaways

  • Market growth is driven by aging populations and escalating chronic disease prevalence.
  • Plastic containers dominate due to safety, convenience, and cost advantages; non-PVC options offer regulatory benefits.
  • Regulatory pathways are complex; early engagement reduces time to market.
  • Revenue projections suggest breaking even within 2-3 years with scalable production.
  • Cost optimization and strategic distribution alliances are essential for maintaining competitive margins.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: What are the primary regulatory challenges for manufacturing Dextrose and Sodium Chloride solutions?
A1: Ensuring GMP compliance, sterilization validation, container safety standards, and timely approval from agencies like the FDA and EMA constitute primary challenges, addressed through early planning and comprehensive documentation.

Q2: How does the market for injectable electrolyte solutions compare regionally?
A2: North America and Europe dominate due to advanced healthcare infrastructure, whereas Asia-Pacific presents high growth potential driven by expanding hospital facilities and rising healthcare expenditure.

Q3: What are the key differentiators for new entrants in this market?
A3: Differentiators include product quality, packaging innovations, cost efficiencies, supply chain resilience, and strong local regulatory compliance.

Q4: What is the typical timeline from product development to market launch?
A4: Approximately 12-24 months, depending on regulatory approval, manufacturing setup, and distribution readiness.

Q5: How sensitive is the market to raw material price fluctuations?
A5: Significant, given raw materials constitute 25-35% of manufacturing costs. Long-term contracts and bulk purchasing mitigate risks.


References

[1] MarketResearch.com, "Global IV Fluid Market Forecast 2023-2028," 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.