Last Updated: June 17, 2026

CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container is a drug marketed by Abbott Labs and Baxter Hlthcare and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER is clindamycin phosphate. There are fifty-five drug master file entries for this compound. Thirty-eight suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the clindamycin phosphate profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Clindamycin Phosphate In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

A generic version of CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER was approved as clindamycin phosphate by HIKMA on April 25th, 1988.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What are the global sales for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
Summary for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
US Patents:0
Applicants:2
NDAs:2

US Patents and Regulatory Information for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Abbott Labs CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clindamycin phosphate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 065027-001 Jun 29, 2001 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Baxter Hlthcare CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clindamycin phosphate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050648-001 Dec 29, 1989 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Abbott Labs CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clindamycin phosphate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 065027-002 Jun 29, 2001 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Abbott Labs CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clindamycin phosphate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 065027-003 Jun 29, 2001 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Baxter Hlthcare CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clindamycin phosphate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050648-003 Dec 29, 1989 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER: Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis

Last updated: April 24, 2026

What is the product and how is it positioned commercially?

Product: Clindamycin phosphate in dextrose 5% in plastic container (intravenous infusion; “in dextrose 5%” formulation).
Core commercial driver: IV clindamycin supply into hospital formularies for intra-abdominal infections, bone and joint infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and other antibiotic use cases where clindamycin is clinically appropriate.

Because the drug is a generic antibiotic formulation (clindamycin phosphate is off-patent in most jurisdictions), the investment case typically hinges less on long-term exclusivity and more on:

  • Manufacturing reliability and supply continuity
  • Cost of goods and contract pricing
  • Regulatory standing (facility inspections, quality systems)
  • Channel strength (GPO contracts, hospital purchasing patterns)
  • Supply risk and substitution cycles for IV antibiotics

What are the fundamental demand anchors for IV clindamycin in D5W?

Demand mechanics (typical for IV antibiotics)

IV antibiotics show demand stability driven by:

  • Hospital admissions volume and case-mix
  • Antibiotic prescribing patterns and local antibiograms
  • Formulary access (preferred vs non-preferred)
  • Treatment duration (days per episode)
  • Competitive substitution among IV lincosamides and alternative agents

Formulation-specific considerations

“Clindamycin phosphate in dextrose 5% in plastic container” adds formulation-layer drivers:

  • Administration workflow: ready-to-use D5W infusions can reduce pharmacy compounding labor relative to bulk drug handling
  • Compatibility and stability: clinicians select infusion solutions that meet compatibility and shelf-life requirements for IV therapy
  • Plastic container adoption: hospitals often standardize on plastic systems for handling and waste workflow

How does this product behave economically in generics?

Pricing and margin structure

For generic IV antibiotics, profitability usually depends on:

  • Auction-style competitive contracting (GPO and large IDN contracts)
  • Short-cycle pricing resets when new suppliers enter or when supply constraints occur
  • Volume scale (high throughput manufacturing reduces unit cost)
  • Package and container compliance costs (sterile filtration, aseptic filling, container qualification)

Market dynamics typical to sterile injectables

Key swings usually come from:

  • Sterility assurance and batch release throughput
  • Regulatory or quality events at manufacturing sites
  • Raw material cost changes and lead-time risk
  • Inventory positioning ahead of contract renewals

In this category, investors generally underwrite not “growth optionality,” but delivery reliability plus defensible unit economics.

What is the patent and exclusivity landscape relevant to this use case?

Clindamycin phosphate is widely available as a generic active ingredient. For an investment view on this specific branded-like presentation (clindamycin phosphate in dextrose 5% in plastic container), the relevant IP tends to fall into two buckets:

  1. Formulation or manufacturing process patents that protect specific product attributes (container type, concentration, pH/osmolality targets, manufacturing route) where granted and in force.
  2. Regulatory exclusivities tied to the specific NDA/ANDA reference and any data exclusivities that could cover the particular presentation.

A reliable fundamental conclusion in generics is that securing long duration exclusivity is not the primary thesis unless a specific in-force patent family and claim scope cleanly covers manufacturing and marketing of the exact presentation. Absent a clearly documented enforceable exclusivity, the investment case becomes a supply-and-contract story.

What are the operating fundamentals investors should underwrite?

1) Supply continuity risk

For IV antibiotics in plastic containers, investors typically score:

  • Aseptic process controls and batch failure rate
  • Sterility assurance program performance
  • On-time delivery against hospital contract requirements
  • Any history of FDA warning letters or 483 observations at relevant sites

2) Contracting power

Fundamentals improve when the seller has:

  • Preferential inclusion in large IDN formularies
  • Stable GPO coverage with favorable pricing terms
  • Ability to maintain supply under allocation events

3) Manufacturing scale and cost position

Cost position improves when the supplier has:

  • Dedicated capacity for sterile injectables
  • High utilization rates
  • Low rejection rates and strong yield
  • Bulk procurement advantages for clindamycin phosphate and D5W components

4) Regulatory compliance

Long-run value depends on avoiding:

  • Recalls linked to sterility, container-closure integrity, particulates, or labeling defects
  • Persistent out-of-spec trends
  • Time-consuming remediation that disrupts shipments

How should investors build an investment scenario?

A practical scenario framework for a generic IV antibiotic formulation is to model value under three supply regimes:

Scenario A: “Stable supply + steady contracting”

  • Assumptions: no material quality events; contract renewals with modest price pressure; standard competitive environment.
  • Outcome: predictable cash flows; returns track distribution scale and operating discipline.

Scenario B: “Supply constraint + temporary premium pricing”

  • Assumptions: competitor capacity disruptions or quality suspensions; allocation periods create higher realized net prices for a period.
  • Outcome: short-term margin expansion but earnings durability depends on whether constraint persists and whether new entrants restore supply.

Scenario C: “Quality disruption + volume loss”

  • Assumptions: sterility/quality failure or major remediation delays shipments; lost hospital contracts and damaged purchasing confidence.
  • Outcome: downside is disproportionate because sterile injectable supply shocks often trigger broader formulary substitution and reorder delays.

What KPIs map directly to investor outcomes?

Use these measurable drivers for underwriting:

  • Net sales per delivered unit (not list price): reflects contract pricing and allowances.
  • Gross margin stability: indicates cost control and manufacturing yield.
  • Fill rate / on-time delivery: correlates with contract retention.
  • Batch approval timelines: predicts shipment continuity.
  • Recall or quality incident frequency: predicts risk-adjusted returns.
  • Inventory turns: reveals distribution efficiency and channel risk.

What are likely end-user and channel constraints that affect demand?

  • Hospital antibiotic stewardship protocols: clindamycin use can shift based on local guidance for MRSA coverage, anaerobe coverage, and toxicity concerns.
  • Substitution by alternatives: if clinicians prefer other IV options with better dosing convenience or narrower adverse profile, volume can shift.
  • Formulary access and procurement cycles: even when clinical demand exists, purchasing timing can lag.

For this specific presentation, practical constraints include:

  • Pharmacy handling policies for plastic containers
  • Compatibility standards for co-administered IV regimens
  • Shelf-life requirements for stocked inventory

What does due diligence focus on for this exact presentation?

For investment-grade diligence, focus on product-level execution:

  1. Container and presentation compliance

    • Plastic container integrity and seal performance
    • Labeling accuracy for dosing and administration instructions
    • Visual inspection and particulate controls
  2. Manufacturing site qualification

    • Sterile filling line performance and environmental monitoring results
    • Aseptic process validation status
    • Any remediation schedules that could affect release timelines
  3. Regulatory inspection outcomes

    • FDA inspection classification history
    • Corrective and preventive action (CAPA) closure rate
    • Batch release performance under validated ranges
  4. Commercial evidence

    • Hospital/GPO contracting strength
    • Order history by account type
    • Evidence of substitution resistance (how often clinicians or pharmacists switch to alternatives)

What competitive landscape pressures matter most?

Generic competition

Clindamycin IV formulations compete on:

  • Net price and contract terms
  • Supply reliability
  • Packaging equivalence (container type and stability)
  • Shortage dynamics (allocation and substitution)

Substitution risk

If a product is out of stock, systems typically switch to another supplier or formulation with similar administration properties. That means the upside from supply constraints can be temporary if competitors can re-enter quickly.

Key Takeaways

  • This is a generic IV antibiotic formulation investment where value comes from supply continuity, regulatory performance, and contract execution, not long exclusivity.
  • D5W-ready plastic container presentation adds operational preference in hospitals, but purchasing is still primarily controlled by net pricing and reliability.
  • Investment scenarios should be underwritten around stable supply, temporary premium pricing from competitor disruptions, and quality disruption downside.
  • Diligence should prioritize aseptic manufacturing performance, batch release stability, inspection outcomes, and delivered-unit economics.
  • Returns will correlate strongly with fill rate, margin stability, and avoidance of sterile injectable quality events.

FAQs

1) Is this product likely to have long-term patent exclusivity?

Typically no; clindamycin phosphate products are generally generic, so durable exclusivity is uncommon unless a specific formulation or process patent still covers the exact presentation.

2) What most affects realized revenue for this IV antibiotic?

Contract pricing and ability to deliver on time. For sterile injectables, net price plus service reliability usually matter more than list price.

3) Does the “plastic container in D5W” change the investment risk profile?

It can. Container-closure integrity, compatibility, and aseptic filling performance create specific quality and supply risks tied to the presentation.

4) What is the biggest swing factor for margins in generic IV antibiotics?

Yield and batch release performance, which drive cost per approved unit and can swing gross margin during supply constraints or quality disruptions.

5) How should an investor interpret demand trends for IV clindamycin?

Demand is usually stable at the macro level, but realized volume can shift based on formulary decisions, stewardship protocols, and substitution during stockouts.


References

  1. FDA. “Guidance for Industry: Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing.” U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. FDA. “Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals.” U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  3. FDA. “Drug Approval Reports / ANDA Information.” U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  4. ISMP. “Medication Safety in Injectable Products.” Institute for Safe Medication Practices.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.