Last Updated: May 3, 2026

CIPROFLOXACIN Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Ciprofloxacin, and when can generic versions of Ciprofloxacin launch?

Ciprofloxacin is a drug marketed by Chartwell, Baxter Hlthcare Corp, Bedford Labs, Dr Reddys, Fresenius Kabi Usa, Hikma Farmaceutica, Hospira, Amneal, Sentiss, Sun Pharm, Upsher Smith Labs, Ani Pharms, Dr Reddys Labs Ltd, Fosun Pharma, Ph Health, Rising, Altaire Pharms Inc, Amring Pharms, Fdc Ltd, Pharmobedient, Rubicon Research, The J Molner, Watson Labs Inc, New Heightsrx, Aiping Pharm Inc, Aurobindo Pharma, Barr, Carlsbad, Hikma, Ivax Sub Teva Pharms, Natco, Nostrum Labs, Pliva, Sun Pharm Inds Ltd, Taro, Teva, Unique, Watson Labs, Yiling, Cosette Pharms Nc, Baxter Hlthcare, Bedford, Inforlife, and Teva Pharms. and is included in fifty-five NDAs.

The generic ingredient in CIPROFLOXACIN is ciprofloxacin hydrochloride; hydrocortisone. There are thirty-four drug master file entries for this compound. Four suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the ciprofloxacin hydrochloride; hydrocortisone profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for CIPROFLOXACIN?
  • What are the global sales for CIPROFLOXACIN?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for CIPROFLOXACIN?
Summary for CIPROFLOXACIN
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for CIPROFLOXACIN
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
CIPRO Oral Suspension ciprofloxacin 250 mg/5 mL and 500 mg/ 5 mL 020780 1 2009-10-16

US Patents and Regulatory Information for CIPROFLOXACIN

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Pliva CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE ciprofloxacin hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 076426-002 Jun 15, 2005 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Bedford CIPROFLOXACIN IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER ciprofloxacin INJECTABLE;INJECTION 078114-001 Mar 18, 2008 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Aiping Pharm Inc CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE ciprofloxacin hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 076593-004 Jun 9, 2004 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Fdc Ltd CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE ciprofloxacin hydrochloride SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 077568-001 Jun 30, 2008 AT RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Teva CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE ciprofloxacin hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 076136-003 Jun 9, 2004 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Ciprofloxacin Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis

Last updated: April 25, 2026

What is ciprofloxacin and where does it sit in the drug value chain?

Ciprofloxacin is a systemically administered fluoroquinolone antibiotic used for a range of bacterial infections, including urinary tract infections and certain respiratory and gastrointestinal infections. The product is widely available generically in most markets, which makes ciprofloxacin’s investment profile driven by (1) formulation and delivery differentiation, (2) competitive pricing dynamics, and (3) country-specific regulatory and reimbursement structures rather than by sustained branded intellectual property.

From an R&D and patent economics perspective, ciprofloxacin is a mature small-molecule franchise with an extensive generic footprint. In practice, new investment typically focuses on lifecycle strategies, combination products, or alternative presentations rather than new molecular IP.

How does the IP landscape affect future cash flows?

Ciprofloxacin’s earliest patent estate is long expired in major jurisdictions, shifting the market to generic competition. As a result, the dominant IP relevance for investors is:

  • Manufacturing process patents (where they exist and are enforced)
  • Formulation and dosing regimen patents (extended-release, taste-masked pediatric formulations, fixed-dose combinations)
  • Regulatory exclusivities (rare compared with brand-new entities; typically limited in effect for a mature molecule)
  • Patent thickets around specific brands in specific geographies (historically relevant but now mostly diminished)

The economic implication: for ciprofloxacin, the base case is low incremental margin unless the investor holds a cost or supply advantage or has legal/regulatory positioning around a specific product line.

What is the competitive market structure and what does it mean for pricing power?

Ciprofloxacin is a global antibiotic with heavy generic penetration. This drives a market structure where:

  • Pricing converges quickly to marginal cost levels.
  • Contract manufacturing and API sourcing costs drive profitability.
  • Inventory and supply chain execution can matter as much as sales execution.

In practical business terms, investors should model profitability around:

  • API and intermediate cost curves
  • Yield and batch consistency
  • Regulatory inspection outcomes and supply reliability
  • Tender and reimbursement pricing behavior (especially in Europe and public payer systems)

Which indications drive volume and where are the demand risks?

Ciprofloxacin use is supported by broad clinical indications, but its investment economics face demand uncertainty from:

  • Antibiotic stewardship policies
  • Guideline updates favoring narrow-spectrum agents in some settings
  • Resistance-driven prescribing behavior
  • Safety and tolerability perceptions that can shift clinician preference

That said, fluoroquinolones remain used where oral or IV options provide effective coverage and where formularies still support them.

Key operational implication for an investor: the addressable market is not just “infections,” but “infections where ciprofloxacin remains guideline-acceptable and payer-supported.”

What are the core fundamentals: safety, resistance, and clinical positioning?

Resistance and stewardship

Fluoroquinolone class resistance is a persistent headwind. Investment fundamentals for ciprofloxacin therefore depend on being able to compete on:

  • cost and supply
  • predictable clinical outcomes within current guidance
  • fast regulatory throughput in local markets

Safety profile

Ciprofloxacin has known class-associated safety considerations that can affect prescribing in certain patient populations. This does not eliminate market demand, but it contributes to tighter stewardship and potential use restrictions in some clinical contexts.

Clinical position

Ciprofloxacin’s clinical role is strongest when it fits guideline-recommended settings, including where its spectrum is appropriate and where oral-to-IV therapy paths are clinically meaningful.

What is the regulatory and reimbursement reality for ciprofloxacin?

Ciprofloxacin is an established antibiotic, so regulatory friction is lower than for novel drugs, but it is not trivial for investors because:

  • Market entry depends on local approvals for each strength and dosage form.
  • Bioequivalence and CMC (chemistry, manufacturing, and controls) are the gating items for generics and lifecycle products.
  • Tender cycles and national reimbursement rules can swing demand rapidly.

The most reliable earnings model is usually:

  • established registration portfolio
  • long-term supply agreements
  • market presence across procurement channels

What does the patent-to-generic transition imply for growth prospects?

For investors, ciprofloxacin is unlikely to deliver branded-style growth from molecular innovation. Growth tends to come from:

  • Capturing incremental share through pricing and reliable supply
  • Securing differentiated presentations (where regulatory and commercial advantages exist)
  • Scaling manufacturing to lower unit costs
  • Geographic expansion where generics are less saturated or reimbursement has room for new suppliers

Any “new entry” thesis is therefore execution-heavy, not discovery-heavy.

How should an investor underwrite margin in ciprofloxacin?

1) Cost-of-goods sensitivity

Profits are tightly linked to:

  • API and intermediate procurement costs
  • batch yields
  • solvent and energy usage
  • waste and compliance-related costs

2) Pricing dynamics

Pricing is driven by:

  • competitive generic tender bids
  • buyer concentration (hospital group procurement)
  • substitution policies
  • reference pricing

3) Supply chain execution

Because antibiotics can face:

  • abrupt demand spikes in infection seasons
  • procurement timing risk
  • inspection and capacity constraints

Operational continuity is a margin stabilizer.

4) Product portfolio mix

Higher margins (relative to commodity products) can come from:

  • specific dosing strengths that are less commoditized
  • packaging formats favored by local buyers
  • combination products where allowed and supported

What does “fundamentals” look like from an investment lens: scenarios?

Scenario A: Commodity spread compression continues

  • Multiple generic entrants sustain low pricing.
  • Margin stabilizes near cost plus a thin spread.
  • Returns depend on scale and cost leadership.

Investor posture: industrial cost focus, procurement leverage, capacity stability.

Scenario B: Limited differentiation extends usable pricing

  • Certain dosage forms or line extensions maintain better buyer preference.
  • Short tender cycles still compress price but at a slower pace.
  • Margin improves modestly through mix and reliability.

Investor posture: product portfolio build, regulatory throughput, contract procurement strategy.

Scenario C: Regulatory or stewardship tightening reduces volume

  • Formulary restrictions shift utilization away from fluoroquinolones in some settings.
  • Volume declines in specific geographies or indications.
  • Pricing may drop further, but volume falls faster than unit cost.

Investor posture: indication and geography rebalancing, inventory discipline, portfolio hedging.

What are the practical diligence checkpoints for a ciprofloxacin thesis?

Manufacturing and compliance

  • Inspection history and batch deviation rates
  • CAPA effectiveness
  • stability of key starting materials
  • contamination control and reproducibility

Regulatory footprint

  • number of registrations by strength and dosage form
  • product-specific renewal timelines
  • pending variations or line extensions

Commercial and tender exposure

  • customer concentration (top accounts and contract durations)
  • tender win rate and average realized price
  • substitution policies and buyer switching behavior

Competitive mapping

  • competitor lead times and pricing cadence
  • capacity expansions that may trigger price drops
  • local generic penetration rates

What is the bottom-line investment profile?

Ciprofloxacin behaves like a mature, commodity-like antibiotic where the investment payoff comes from operational excellence and commercialization execution rather than patent-driven exclusivity. The strongest financial outcomes track:

  • cost leadership in API-to-finished-dose manufacturing
  • durable procurement relationships
  • a regulatory portfolio with broad strength coverage
  • inventory and supply chain resilience
  • product mix that reduces direct price homogeneity

The key risk is that generic pricing compression and stewardship-driven utilization changes can overwhelm any localized differentiation unless an investor holds a structural cost or market access advantage.

Key Takeaways

  • Ciprofloxacin is mature and generic-dominated; investment returns depend on manufacturing economics and market access, not new molecular IP.
  • Antibiotic stewardship and resistance patterns shape demand and can tighten prescribing in some settings.
  • Margin underwriting should center on API and manufacturing cost, tender pricing dynamics, and supply reliability.
  • A durable thesis is scale plus regulatory breadth, with a product mix that avoids pure commoditization.

FAQs

  1. Is ciprofloxacin still a growth market?
    Growth is generally share-and-portfolio driven rather than category-expansion driven, with most gains coming from operational scale and tender wins.

  2. What most affects ciprofloxacin profitability?
    Realized tender pricing and unit cost structure, including API procurement and manufacturing yield.

  3. How do resistance and stewardship affect ciprofloxacin investment?
    They can reduce utilization in some indications or geographies and can accelerate substitution away from fluoroquinolones, impacting volume.

  4. What types of “innovation” matter for ciprofloxacin investors?
    Lifecycle differentiation in dosage form, combination products where appropriate, and manufacturing/process improvements that lower cost and improve reliability.

  5. What diligence items are non-negotiable?
    Regulatory readiness by strength, validated manufacturing performance, inspection history, and contract/tender customer exposure.


References

[1] FDA. Drug Safety and Availability: Ciprofloxacin. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/ (accessed 2026-04-25).
[2] EMA. Ciprofloxacin: Product information and related regulatory documents. European Medicines Agency. https://www.ema.europa.eu/ (accessed 2026-04-25).
[3] WHO. Antibiotic resistance: global situation and guidance on stewardship. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/ (accessed 2026-04-25).
[4] FDA. Generic Drug User Fees and Abbreviated Applications (ANDA) regulatory framework. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/ (accessed 2026-04-25).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.