Last Updated: August 3, 2026

CETIRIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE HIVES Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Cetirizine Hydrochloride Hives, and what generic alternatives are available?

Cetirizine Hydrochloride Hives is a drug marketed by Aiping Pharm Inc, Dr Reddys Labs Ltd, Marksans Pharma, Mylan, Orbion Pharms, Perrigo R And D, Sun Pharm Inds Inc, Sun Pharm Inds Ltd, Unichem, Unique, Aurobindo Pharma Ltd, Bionpharma, Amneal Pharms Ny, Taro, and Torrent Pharms Llc. and is included in seventeen NDAs.

The generic ingredient in CETIRIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE HIVES is cetirizine hydrochloride. There are thirty-nine drug master file entries for this compound. One hundred and sixty-three suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the cetirizine hydrochloride profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Cetirizine Hydrochloride Hives

A generic version of CETIRIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE HIVES was approved as cetirizine hydrochloride by PADAGIS US on June 17th, 2008.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for CETIRIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE HIVES?
  • What are the global sales for CETIRIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE HIVES?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for CETIRIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE HIVES?
Summary for CETIRIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE HIVES
US Patents:0
Applicants:15
NDAs:17

US Patents and Regulatory Information for CETIRIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE HIVES

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Torrent Pharms Llc CETIRIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE HIVES RELIEF cetirizine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 079191-003 Apr 15, 2010 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd CETIRIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE HIVES RELIEF cetirizine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 090760-002 Aug 5, 2015 OTC No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Torrent Pharms Llc CETIRIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE HIVES RELIEF cetirizine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 079191-002 Apr 15, 2010 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd CETIRIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE HIVES RELIEF cetirizine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 090760-004 Aug 5, 2015 OTC No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Aiping Pharm Inc CETIRIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE HIVES cetirizine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 202277-001 Mar 11, 2014 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Last updated: July 25, 2026

Cetirizine Hydrochloride (Hives) Investment Scenario and Patent/Regulatory Fundamentals Analysis

Cetirizine hydrochloride for allergic conditions including hives is an established, off-patent small-molecule antihistamine in most major markets. For investors, the opportunity profile is shaped less by near-term exclusivity and more by (1) formulation differentiation, (2) pricing and payer contracting dynamics, (3) channel concentration for OTC and store brand supply, and (4) legal exposure from brand-to-generic transitions and reformulation claims. The base molecule is widely genericized, so upside concentrates in line extensions (dose form, controlled release, pediatric use, combination products), niche branded segments, and manufacturing scale.

No complete and accurate patent estate, Orange Book status, FDA approvals list, exclusivity dates, or active Paragraph IV litigation identifiers for “cetirizine hydrochloride hives” can be produced from the provided input.

What is the current FDA and market status of cetirizine for hives?

Direct answer: Cetirizine is marketed for allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria (hives). The competitive reality is dominated by generics and OTC/private-label availability, limiting brand-like pricing power.

Which products matter for investment modeling (brand vs generic vs OTC)

  • Revenue is typically driven by:
    • OTC penetration and store brands
    • pharmacy channel volumes (generic scripts)
    • pediatric formulations and dosing convenience
  • Market behavior is shaped by:
    • seasonal demand
    • substitution at the pharmacy counter
    • payer formularies that favor lowest cost generics
    • retailer/private label pricing pressure

What dosing forms drive demand

Demand tends to concentrate in:

  • tablets/capsules for adult use
  • liquid formulations for pediatrics
  • dissolvable or fast-dissolve variants where offered (if available in the market)

What patents protect cetirizine hydrochloride for hives and chronic urticaria?

Direct answer: Cetirizine’s core compound patent coverage is largely expired; residual protection, where it exists, is usually tied to specific formulations, dosing regimens, or combinations rather than the active moiety.

What types of IP remain investable

When an active ingredient is off-patent, investment-grade IP typically comes from:

  • formulation patents (e.g., altered release, stability, bioavailability)
  • method-of-use patents (narrow dosing regimens, specific urticaria subpopulations)
  • pediatric dosing or delivery system claims
  • fixed-dose combinations (cetirizine with other actives)

How this changes the risk profile

  • Generic competition is the base case.
  • Any remaining exclusivity is likely to be incremental and time-limited.
  • Enforcement risk shifts to reformulation claims rather than compound claims.

When does cetirizine hydrochloride lose exclusivity in the US and key markets?

Direct answer: For cetirizine as a molecule, exclusivity is not the main driver in the current era; generic entry is already established. Remaining timelines (if any) depend on specific patents tied to particular dosage forms or combinations.

What matters for launch timing

If pursuing a new product category, the relevant dates are:

  • expiration of formulation/method patents covering the exact dosage form and claimed method
  • any patent thickets around stability or release characteristics
  • regulatory exclusivities specific to a particular NDA/ANDA approval (not the active ingredient generally)

What is the Orange Book status of cetirizine hydrochloride products used for hives?

Direct answer: Cetirizine products used for chronic urticaria are generally served by multiple ANDAs; therefore, Orange Book coverage usually reflects old patents with limited remaining force and/or formulation-specific claims.

What an investor should look for on the Orange Book

  • active listed patents for each specific strength and dosage form
  • patent expiration dates
  • whether listed patents are tied to:
    • drug substance
    • drug product formulation
    • method-of-use
    • combination components
  • whether ANDA applicants have received approvals and whether Paragraph IV certifications were made

How many patents cover cetirizine hydrochloride formulations for allergic urticaria?

Direct answer: The number is typically high in the historical record but low in economic significance because many patents are expired or not enforceable against common generic supply.

Economic interpretation

  • Patent counts are not predictive of market power in off-patent small molecules.
  • Investors should treat the question as “how many enforceable, relevant claims map to the exact product and manufacturing approach.”

Which companies are challenging cetirizine hydrochloride, and what generic entry risks exist?

Direct answer: Generic manufacturers are the primary competitive force, with entry risks already realized for standard immediate-release and liquid cetirizine products. New entrants face typical ANDA hurdles and any formulation-specific patent constraints.

Typical litigation patterns for mature antihistamine generics

  • Paragraph IV challenges usually concentrate on the last remaining formulation or method patents, when they still exist.
  • Settlements, where they occur, commonly address:
    • specific dosage forms
    • design-around release profiles
    • labeling and method-of-use carveouts

What patent litigation affects cetirizine hydrochloride for hives?

Direct answer: For most cetirizine indications and common dosage forms, the litigation landscape is largely historical, with today’s market already dominated by generics.

What matters if you are assessing a new formulation

  • Whether any currently unexpired patents are asserted in relation to:
    • release mechanism
    • stability claims
    • pediatric liquid formulations
    • combination products
  • Whether earlier cases established claim construction that constrains enforcement

Do biosimilars apply to cetirizine hydrochloride?

Direct answer: No. Cetirizine is a small molecule, so the biosimilar framework does not apply.

Which cetirizine hydrochloride formulations are protected (and which are likely design-around risks)?

Direct answer: If there is investable protection, it is most often tied to:

  • controlled/modified-release delivery systems
  • specific excipient systems and stability profiles
  • pediatric dosing formats with particular concentration and presentation
  • fixed-dose combinations

Design-around reality

Even when patents exist, generics can often design around:

  • release kinetics
  • particle size or formulation parameters (if not fully controlled by claims)
  • manufacturing processes not recited in method claims

How does cetirizine compare with other OTC antihistamines for hives in investment terms?

Direct answer: The competitive set for chronic urticaria and allergy symptom control typically includes second-generation antihistamines (e.g., loratadine, fexofenadine, levocetirizine) and first-generation agents. Investment strength usually tracks:

  • cost per dose
  • payer and retail positioning
  • perceived speed and duration claims
  • pediatric acceptability and dosing convenience

Competitive dynamic that shapes margins

  • Second-generation agents generally converge on similar clinical profiles.
  • Pricing power depends on:
    • supply stability
    • contracting
    • brand marketing (if any) and OTC placement
    • differentiation via formulation and convenience

What manufacturing and supply chain/IP barriers exist for cetirizine?

Direct answer: For standard cetirizine forms, barriers are primarily compliance and GMP scale rather than IP. For differentiated dosage forms (if targeted), the barrier shifts to:

  • formulation development capability
  • stability and shelf-life performance
  • manufacturing process control and validation
  • regulatory CMC documentation

Investor-relevant CMC checkpoints

  • impurity profiles and control strategy
  • bioequivalence package readiness
  • stability data robustness
  • scalable process parameters for high-volume supply

Regulatory considerations: what FDA pathway options exist for new cetirizine hives products?

Direct answer: New products for cetirizine will generally follow:

  • ANDA pathways for generic equivalents if no meaningful differentiation requires an NDA
  • NDA pathways if the product is truly novel (e.g., new combination, new delivery system with a new clinical strategy)

What tends to drive development cost and timeline

  • BE study design (fasted/fed, PK parameters)
  • CMC scale-up and stability
  • labeling claims for chronic urticaria/hives
  • combination/regulatory complexity if adding actives

Investment scenarios: where the returns can realistically come from

Direct answer: With cetirizine as a mature off-patent molecule, realistic investment scenarios are narrow and execution-focused.

Scenario 1: Generic manufacturing and distribution scale

  • Revenue is volume-driven.
  • Margin depends on:
    • procurement costs for APIs/excipients
    • yield and batch success rates
    • distribution contracts and rebate structures

Scenario 2: Differentiated formulation line extension

  • Returns depend on:
    • obtaining credible, enforceable formulation claims (if any remain)
    • demonstrating meaningful patient or prescriber value (speed, dosing convenience, adherence)
    • sustaining pricing above store brands

Scenario 3: Combination product or pediatric-first strategy

  • Returns depend on:
    • safety labeling clarity
    • BE approach for combination components
    • differentiation in pediatric adherence and dosing accuracy

Scenario 4: Brand revival for OTC positioning

  • Returns depend on marketing spend efficiency and retailer adoption.
  • IP advantage is not the primary driver; execution and channel strategy are.

Key Takeaways

  • Cetirizine hydrochloride for hives is a mature, generic-dominated small molecule market; exclusivity is not typically the investment centerpiece.
  • Investable upside, if any, is usually tied to differentiated dosage forms, combinations, pediatric delivery formats, or manufacturing scale advantages.
  • Patent-driven protection is most likely limited to formulation or method-of-use claims rather than the active ingredient itself.
  • Regulatory and competitive risk is primarily about crowded supply, BE/CMC execution, and whether any formulation-specific patent coverage can be avoided or licensed.

FAQs

  1. What is the safest long-term OTC dosing approach for chronic urticaria with cetirizine?
  2. How do store brands and OTC pricing dynamics impact profitability for generic cetirizine?
  3. What formulation changes (liquid vs tablet vs dissolvable) most affect regulatory BE study design?
  4. Do cetirizine combination products face different patent and exclusivity risk than single-ingredient products?
  5. What CMC impurity controls and stability requirements are most likely to constrain new cetirizine ANDA approvals?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. FDA Drug Approval Reports / Approved Drug Products. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  3. FDA ANDA Regulatory Guidance. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.